The New York Timesreports that
cap-and-trade as energy policy is dead, and does not
mentionClimategate (and
subsequent Warming
Scandalgates) anywhere as a cause.
The New York Times
reports that cap-and-trade as energy policy is dead, and does
not mention Climategate (and
subsequent
Warming Scandalgates) anywhere as a cause. Instead they
requisition political post-mortems from the likes of Sens. John
Kerry and Lindsay Graham, as well the bazillion-dollar
Environmental Defense Fund’s head, Fred Krupp:
Why did cap and trade die? The short answer is that it was
done in by the weak economy, the Wall Street meltdown,
determined industry opposition and its own complexity….
“Economywide cap and trade died of what amounts to natural
causes in Washington,” said Fred Krupp,
president of the Environmental Defense
Fund, who has been promoting the idea for more than
two decades. “The term itself became too polarizing and too
paralyzing in the effort to win over conservative Democrats and
moderate Republicans to try to do something about climate
change and our oil dependency.”
As
I reported last year, Krupp was the hypocrite who demanded
the Securities and Exchange Commission require companies to
report climate-related disclosures in their filings:
“As the nation responds to the challenges of global
warming, investors have a right to know which businesses are
forging innovative solutions for the 21st century and which are
lagging behind,” [Krupp] said in a release.
I’m still waiting for Krupp to disclose how his massive
organization is “forging innovative solutions” with their own
greenhouse gas-reducing practices and behaviors. After all:
According to EDF’s tax return for Fiscal Year ending in Sept.
2007 (the most recent available on Guidestar), the organization
spent $3.5 million for travel. Undoubtedly that paid for a lot of
plane trips, vehicle rentals, etc. Got a breakdown of that for
us, Fred? What kind of carbon offsets are you buying to cover
that? (We demand transparency!)
And according to the 2007 annual report, EDF has 10 offices
throughout the U.S. and one in Beijing. Can you provide a carbon
impact assessment for us? You’ve got three offices in California,
and three in the Northeast Corridor of the U.S. (four if you add
Raleigh). No opportunities for consolidation there to minimize
greenhouse gas impact? And are you mostly served by coal-burning
utilities or something else?
And finally, what mode of transportation are your 318
employees and 43 voting board members using to get to work every
day? Any SUVs? Pick-up trucks? Other gas guzzlers? Or are they
buying into the EDF vision and riding mass transit or driving
hybrids? With more than $85 million in revenues in 2007 alone at
your disposal, I’m sure you can take care of these little things
for your people as you practice what you preach.
A death from “natural causes?” As recently as five months ago
Krupp was pushing cap-and-trade as viable, lying about scientific
trends and defending the shameless Al Gore (watch video below).
But now, all of a sudden, it’s died due to simple polarization
and paralyzation, and Climategate had nothing to do with it?
The fraud behind global warming extends in every direction, and
has not let up. And cap-and-trade is not dead.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause
and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress
impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist
surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our
culture.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it,
makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so
many people seem to be hostile to it?