The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Brian,

I’m not sure it’s fair to say Rep. Cao was a big “political loser.” Yes, he was at political risk. But his very political existence is a risk. He knows the odds are stacked against him anyway. He also should know that what lives on after politics is conscience, along with the well-deserved reputation for principle that comes along with a principled stand. And really good politicians know that in the long run, good principles are good politics. One lost race does not mean that no future races are winnable. One lost battle does not end a political war. And it’s easier to recover from a loss if your reputation is intact than it is if your reputation is not intact. Joseph Cao already was at risk of losing his seat this fall. Why not take the risk while standing instead of taking the risk while folding? This way, his supporters know who he is and what he stands for, and will work harder for him. In this race, AND the next.

Either way, both pro-lifers and pro-“choice” folks can admire Rep. Cao’s consistency and his moral clarity. Good for him. Good for all of us to see such an example of courage.

View all comments (9) |

Oldefarte| 3.22.10 @ 4:18PM

Cao is just one of Louisiana's politicians that could/should be in political trouble concerning the liberalism that is running wild via Obama, Reid, Pilosi, Schumer and Democrats. Taxpayer-voters have hopefully had enough [and NOW see through all of their excrement, whether it be Democrat or Republican]. It's time for """""CHANGE"""""" beginning in November!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Roy| 3.22.10 @ 4:34PM

Yeah, if I was Cao, I'd have no problem whatsoever making that argument. This might be too stark a way to phrase it but I'd be saying, if you want a representative who will put free health care for you ahead of the lives of the weak, you shouldn't vote for me anyway.

Roy| 3.22.10 @ 11:47PM

Sweet..now the spambots are using my name. Sigh..TAS..want a captcha control?

Bob Miller| 3.23.10 @ 9:27AM

In general, how should we understand people who would favor the health care monstrosity if it only excluded abortion funding? Is this tunnel vision or what?

More Blog Posts by Quin Hillyer

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/03/22/re-cao-abortion-on-par

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

The Inoperative Jay Carney

Jeffrey Lord | 5.23.13

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable

Betsy McCaughey | 5.23.13

Obama's Imbroglios

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.23.13

Lerner's Plea

Ray V. Hartwell | 5.23.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

Laying Down My Pen

Quin Hillyer | 5.23.13

ADVERTISEMENT