Brian,
I’m
not sure it’s fair to say Rep. Cao was a big “political
loser.” Yes, he was at political risk. But his very political
existence is a risk. He knows the odds are stacked against him
anyway. He also should know that what lives on after politics is
conscience, along with the well-deserved reputation for principle
that comes along with a principled stand. And really good
politicians know that in the long run, good principles are good
politics. One lost race does not mean that no future races are
winnable. One lost battle does not end a political war. And it’s
easier to recover from a loss if your reputation is intact than
it is if your reputation is not intact. Joseph Cao already was at
risk of losing his seat this fall. Why not take the risk while
standing instead of taking the risk while folding? This way, his
supporters know who he is and what he stands for, and will work
harder for him. In this race, AND the next.
Either way, both pro-lifers and pro-“choice” folks can admire
Rep. Cao’s consistency and his moral clarity. Good for him. Good
for all of us to see such an example of courage.
Oldefarte| 3.22.10 @ 4:18PM
Cao is just one of Louisiana's politicians that could/should be in political trouble concerning the liberalism that is running wild via Obama, Reid, Pilosi, Schumer and Democrats. Taxpayer-voters have hopefully had enough [and NOW see through all of their excrement, whether it be Democrat or Republican]. It's time for """""CHANGE"""""" beginning in November!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Roy| 3.22.10 @ 4:34PM
Yeah, if I was Cao, I'd have no problem whatsoever making that argument. This might be too stark a way to phrase it but I'd be saying, if you want a representative who will put free health care for you ahead of the lives of the weak, you shouldn't vote for me anyway.
Roy| 3.22.10 @ 11:47PM
Sweet..now the spambots are using my name. Sigh..TAS..want a captcha control?
Bob Miller| 3.23.10 @ 9:27AM
In general, how should we understand people who would favor the health care monstrosity if it only excluded abortion funding? Is this tunnel vision or what?