The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

After spending $100 million to get the government to encourage us to buy more drugs, PhRMA predictably put out a victory statement.  I've helpfully annotated it:

PhRMA Statement on Health Care Reform

WASHINGTON, March 22 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), WHICH INVESTED $100 MILLION TO EXPAND GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, issued the following statement today on passage of comprehensive health care reform and accompanying reconciliation legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives:

"We continue to believe that comprehensive health care reform will benefit OUR MEMBERS BY INCREASING INSURANCE COVERAGE AND THUS THE NUMBER OF PILLS SOLD.  FOR THE RECORD, WE ALSO CLAIM THAT THE LEGISLATION WILL BENEFIT patients and the future of America. TAKING CARE OF OUR MEMBERS IS why we have been involved in this important public policy debate for more than a year and why we CUT A DEAL WITH THE WHITE HOUSE.  THAT DEAL REQUIRED US TO support action by the House to approve the Senate-passed bill along with the amendments found in the reconciliation legislation.

"The existing barriers to quality health care simply are not acceptable. IT IS ESPECIALLY OUTRAGEOUS THAT NOT EVERYONE IN AMERICA BUYS AS MANY PHARMACEUTICALS AS WE WOULD LIKE TO SELL.  Today's important and historic vote in the House will help to expand health care coverage and services to tens of millions of Americans who are uninsured and often forced to forego needed medical treatments--MOST IMPORTANT, THE MEDICINES THAT WE MAKE.

"Our commitment to help pay for health care reform will require all of our companies to make some difficult choices moving forward - on top of already losing more than 150,000 jobs since 2007 because of the recession and other economic factors.  NOT THAT IT WILL REALLY BE THAT HARD, SINCE WE WILL SELL A LOT MORE PILLS, AND THUS END UP AHEAD FINANCIALLY.  BUT WE HAVE TO ACT LIKE PUSHING FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO ACT AS OUR SALES AGENT WAS A HARD DECISION.

"But throughout this long process, we have been guided by a belief that all Americans should have access to high-quality, affordable health care coverage and services--AT LEAST, TO HIGH-QUALITY, APPROPRIATELY PRICED DRUGS. WHETHER AMERICANS ARE ABLE TO AFFORD ANYTHING ELSE REALLY ISN'T OUR CONCERN.  This legislation, while not perfect, is a step in that direction AND WILL GREATLY BENEFIT OUR MEMBERS AS A RESULT.

"Even as we support health care reform legislation, we continue to have concerns about a number of issues including the overly broad powers of a non-elected Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), which could enact sweeping Medicare changes without action by Congress and would not be subject to judicial or administrative review. AFTER ALL, OUR OBJECTIVE IS TO INCREASE OUR REVENUES.  WE DON'T WANT SOME BUREAUCRATS BURIED IN HHS OR SOMEWHERE ELSE IN WASHINGTON CUTTING BACK ON OUR REIMBURSEMENTS.  We look forward to working with Congress to address these concerns and to identify ways to contain medical costs without creating new barriers to quality health care--NAMELY, THE PURCHASE OF MORE DRUGS MADE BY OUR MEMBERS.

"Most importantly, we must also take steps in the years ahead to support critically needed innovation, ensuring future medical advancements and breakthroughs. JUST BECAUSE WE WILL BE SUPPING DEEPLY AT THE PUBLIC TROUGH IS NO REASON FOR CONGRESS TO EXPECT US TO CUT BACK AS HEALTH CARE COSTS EXPLODE.  Americans deserve no less. AT LEAST, OUR MEMBERS DESERVE NO LESS.  New, cutting-edge medicines have dramatically increased life expectancy rates all across our nation and allowed patients to live longer, healthier and more productive lives. AND WE KNOW THAT BY EXPANDING GOVERNMENT CONTROL WE HAVE OPENED OURSELVES TO TOUGHER PRICE REGULATION.  WE ARE JUST HOPING THE REPUBLICANS WILL STUPIDLY FORGIVE AND FORGET, AND PROTECT US WHEN OUR NEW DEMOCRATIC ALLIES INEVITABLY TURN ON US.  We remain totally committed to seeing this progress continue, benefiting Americans for generations to come."

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) represents the country's leading pharmaceutical research and biotechnology companies, which are devoted to inventing medicines that allow patients to live longer, healthier, and more productive lives--AND MAKING MONEY, WHICH IS, AFTER ALL, THE AMERICAN WAY. PhRMA companies are leading the way in the search for new cures. PhRMA members alone invested an estimated $45.8 billion in 2009 in discovering and developing new medicines. Industry-wide research and investment reached a record $65.3 billion in 2009.  WHICH IS WHY WE JUST SPENT A LOT OF MONEY TO GET THE GOVERNMENT TO GET THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO SPEND A LOT MORE MONEY WITH US!

View all comments (24) | Leave a comment

Pingback| 3.22.10 @ 7:01AM

Annotated PhRMA Health Care Statement | bling links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

PhRMA Health Care Statement "Even as we support health care reform legislation, we continue to have concerns about a number of issues including the overly broad powers of a non-elected... Source: American Spectator Bookmark / Share del.icio.us Digg Facebook StumbleUpon DZone Twitter Filed under: health-care-news No Comments Aussies urged to get swine flu jab » Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) ( subscribe to…

SC Mike| 3.22.10 @ 7:23AM

The conservative way to whack PhRMA is through anti-trust, requiring that prices charged within our borders are consistent with prices that foreign governments / medical systems pay. There’s no question that it’s the foreigners who demand the lower prices, but PhRMA has little incentive to fight for reasonable rates that reflect R&D, FDA (and other nation’s) testing regimens, etc. So let’s give them a big one.

Becky| 3.22.10 @ 9:14AM

Can they now quit advertising for drugs where the negatives take longer to list that the benefit does to explain? Ever notice that all drug ads say to "ask your doctor"......... usually about a drug that you don't know what the purpose is, they just know you will want it like the latest fashion.

The largest reason health care costs are so high, is the one that has been encouraged under this bill: third party payer. The least culpable are the private insurance companies. The most culpable are the insured. Insured persons are also the least informed group of the insurance, doctor, Pharma/medical device world.

I recently read the book "The Last Well Person" by Nortin Hadler, and overall it was a relief to find that what I have been thinking or suspecting had some merit. If you find a copy, it is worth reading, for if anything, it may give a lot of those who are worried some reassurance about the ability to make decisions starting with when to go to the doctor.

Like my elderly mother says; she is tired of going to the dr., because they always seem to find something wrong that they want to treat that she didn't know she had. She now has a basket for her pills.

I went to a lecture by an art professor a year ago, and in tribute to her father (who had passed away), she produced a set of ceramic plates that were embedded with the pills her father took in his last years of life. The pills were fired with the clay. Interestingly, the vitamins did not dissolve. Since I saw that, I have not taken a vitamin.

Roy| 3.22.10 @ 9:19AM

Yep..third party payer just got worse..which means get ready for costs to skyrocket even more than they already have.

Grant1863| 3.22.10 @ 9:49AM

Thanks for some gallows humor this sad day. Never give up.

Barry Loberfeld| 3.22.10 @ 3:15PM

"For about a hundred years, America has been a nation of accumulating medical controls. Each new regulation was passed with the same justification made for the previous one: This measure will sufficiently correct the failings of the free market and thus save the free-market system. And the result? Today's "crisis in health care" -- as the welfare statists themselves call this iatrogenic disease. The more band-aids are applied, the more wounds appear! And with nothing but band-aids in their bags, these "liberals" (often the same aging advocates of past regulation) can now prescribe only covering the patient head to toe -- i.e., the final move to the outright socialization of all medicine. What this says about the microcosm of medicine is obvious; what it means for our mixed economy is ominous."

From "Liberalism: History and Future" at ABCDunlimited.com/ideas/liberalism.html

Nikki| 3.23.10 @ 1:29AM

So true, PhRMA is only in it for the money. Your annotations were perfect!

Interesting move that the market backed government control. Usually its the opposite.

PhRMA is not really interested in curing people of what ails them, only in acquiring life-long customers. But really, look at their incentive. Money. Still, people are ever-hopeful that a pill or procedure will protect or cure them from age or disease. Sometimes we are all dumber than a pen full of turkeys.

Nevertheless, I am glad that millions more Americans will now have access to some sort of health safety net. I would far rather open my wallet to provide chemotherapy for a terrified, uninsured American than pay for an idiotic trumped-up war, another yacht for a slimy Wall Street creep, or a private jet for an arrogant auto executive.

If people have had no health care coverage at all, then how can they say their health care choices are being diminished? Perhaps the real point is, wealthier Americans don't want to share the health. Fair enough. But if that's the way you feel, then how can you blame PhRMA for being a big money-grubbing monster?

Sometimes I think maybe Obama should have began this whole healthcare thing by mailing a first-aid kit to every American. That would say, "Hey, we want to do the right thing but we have absolutely no idea how to go about it, so meanwhile, here are some band-aids and free condoms." I mean, George W. Bush gave everyone $300. We really didn't care for George W. but now we have a $300 cabinet in our house that we fondly refer to as the George Bush cabinet. It's stuffed full of papers and crap.

Nikki| 3.23.10 @ 10:38PM

Nevertheless, I am glad that millions more Americans will now have access to some sort of health safety net. I would far rather open my wallet to provide chemotherapy for a terrified, uninsured American than pay for an idiotic trumped-up war, another yacht for a slimy Wall Street creep, or a private jet for an arrogant auto executive.

This website sells reebok easytone. Reebok easy tone is the best pair of your all shoes,you can make a purchase for reebok easytone shoes online.I guarantee you will be fond of reebok easy tone shoes. wholesale reebok shoes wholesale reebok shoes

Pingback| 3.26.10 @ 1:35PM

****~~**Official Health-Care Bill Appreciation Thread **~~**** - Page 2 - Grasscity. links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…and services to tens of millions of Americans who are uninsured and often forced to forego needed medical treatments. For your convenience, Doug Bandow at the American Spectator has provided an annotated version. The all-caps sections are Bandow's additions: PhRMA Statement on Health Care Reform WASHINGTON, March 22 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America…

350-030| 4.19.10 @ 5:37AM

thanks you share

640-553| 4.19.10 @ 5:37AM

thanks you share

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Doug Bandow

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/03/22/annotated-phrma-health-care-st
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT