The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

This is good information for everyone to know.

As linked on Drudge Report (here), there might be some who would want to scare or intimidate you into thinking that calling your Representative with the specific intent of informing him or her that you do not agree with the Health Care Bill is harassment.

According to the United States Code, it is not:

After researching 47 U.S.C. 223, I called Mr. Garamendi’s office [the author's Representative in the House] again and asked to be transferred back to the Capital Police Agent. The Agent picked up the phone and I explained to him that the statute he cited was not controlling since it only prohibits people from calling with the specific intent to harass. I further explained that I was simply trying to voice my concerns with the intent of getting Mr. Garamendi to change his mind, not to harass his staff. The Agent eventually agreed with my position and said he would call Mr. Garamendi’s office and instruct his staff that I was within my rights to call my congressman and voice my concerns.  

So, be polite when you call.  As long as your intent is not to harass, you have license to speak.

And speak you should! Thank Heavens (literally), Americans and Democracy still have something to say about this health care debacle.

View all comments (6) | Leave a comment

Ken (Old Texican)| 3.19.10 @ 3:33PM

Fun point, Robert.

My response? ................screw 'em!

I don't have "concerns". I have a bone to pick with these arrogant ...persons.

I am going to do everything in my power to put them in jail for "contempt of the constitution".

I have the honor of telling 17 congressional staffers that precise message, to pass along to their boss.

HeyTrud| 3.20.10 @ 8:27PM

Go for it! Are you attorney? I'd love to see the Demorats jailed with constant streaming videos to see them squirm

Crusader| 3.19.10 @ 5:41PM

Democracy? If "democracy" had anything to do with HC then it wouldn't even be considered. However, since we live in a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, you can take your "democracy" and stuff it.

SoCon| 3.19.10 @ 7:22PM

I've been saying for a long time now that Fascist Liberals are just jack-booted thugs in democrat drag. They look more Hitlerian every day.

HeyTrud| 3.20.10 @ 8:29PM

LOL! who cares is right! Wake up and smell your coffee because you won't get any if your heart rate super cedes 100 BPM if the communists stay if office any longer. Pay for advertising or go to twitter www.idiottwitter.com they have a group of idots there

office 2007| 3.26.10 @ 9:31PM

Is Office 2007 professional better than Office 2007 ultimate ?

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Robert P. Kirchhoefer

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/03/19/voicing-your-opinion-to-congre

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Sulllivan Silliness

Ross Kaminsky | 5:40PM

Meghan McCain Doesn't Get It

Jeffrey Lord | 1:36PM

The Paul Factor

W. James Antle, III | 1:29PM

Bain v. Solyndra

W. James Antle, III | 12:11PM

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

The White House Sieve

Jed Babbin | 5.29.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Osceola Who?

Reid Collins | 5.29.12

The Bain of Romney's Existence

W. James Antle | 5.29.12

ADVERTISEMENT