President Obama made another stop on his health care road show in
Strongsville, Ohio this afternoon, making the rather odd case
that the American people don't want their representatives to look
at polls measuring what people want.
Wrapping up his speech, Obama said:
“The American people want to know if it’s still possible for
Washington to look out for their interests. For their future.
So what they’re looking for is some courage. They’re waiting
for us to act. They’re waiting for us to lead. They don’t want
us putting our finger out to the wind. They don’t want us
reading polls. They want us to look and see what is the best
thing for America and then, do what’s right.”
This brings to mind two questions. If Obama refuses to look at
public opinion polls, then how can he profess to know what the
American people want? And if he doesn't care about polls, then
how come the White House is
circulating polls on Capitol Hill asserting that support for
health care legislation is rising?
"“The American people want to know if it’s still possible for
Washington to look out for their interests. For their future. So
what they’re looking for is some courage. They’re waiting for us
to act. They’re waiting for us to lead. They don’t want us
putting our finger out to the wind. They don’t want us reading
polls. They want us to look and see what is the best thing for
America and then, do what’s right.”
I wonder if Mr. Klein exhibited this same reverence for the
opinions of the American people (as exhibited in polls) when the
Iraq War was revealed in poll after poll to be deeply unpopular
with a vast majority of Americans.
You have a reverse scenario here. When initiated, the Iraq war
had good polling numbers only to steadily deteriorate as the war
went longer. Here you have a bad poll numbers prior to the
inception with an unknown of which direction they will go. I
would guess that they start out bad and get worse once the taxes
kick in and the economy continues to bog down. It won't help also
when in a few years it becomes next to impossible to get a
doctors appointment and we find out that it is a budget buster
when neither party votes to remove the half a trillion dollars
from medicare as proposed and the bill costs more than expected.
However, that is speculation and only time will tell.
S.L. Toddard| 3.15.10 @ 3:44PM
I think we know which way they'll go - today's proposed
entitlement program is tomorrow's untouchable "right". Much like
they did with Social Security, Medicare et al, tomorrow's
Republicans will defend tooth-and-nail today's progressive
proposals should they become reality.
Why call out the GOP? Once all this is bankrupted, it won't
matter who defended it.
Gene| 3.15.10 @ 7:30PM
The half trillion come from cutting out medicare plus, which is
real popular with those who have it ,they are taking it away from
them and spending it to insure those "30 million uninsured" of
which are 12 million illegal immagrants.
SoCon| 3.15.10 @ 10:09PM
The elderly and the infirm will be 'death paneled' by ObamaCare.
Rationing of care will make sure of it.
Sarah was right.
KINGKID337| 3.25.10 @ 11:05AM
AND OFF!! OMG
Ken (Old Texican)| 3.15.10 @ 4:39PM
UH, Toddard
Do you believe in self defense or not?
Please don't quibble.
Do you or don't you?
You certainly defend yourself here every day with fightin' words.
Are words your final solution, arse?
OK.
I just wanted to finally understand. You believe in verbally
squawking, but don't have the testicular fortitude to take up a
rifle and defend your principles...right?
OK,
You have obviously been protected by all of us neo-cons all your
life, while you squawked at us. You sir, are a joke.
Crusader| 3.15.10 @ 8:56PM
Ken, I certainly believe in self-defense. However, building
schools in Afghanistan and whatever it is we're doing in Iraq is
NO WAY to for America to defend herself against islam (plain old
islam, not "radical" or "facist," etc).
Gene| 3.15.10 @ 7:36PM
Mr. Toddard ,, you need to go take another sip of koolaid.
Tim| 3.15.10 @ 2:43PM
SL, I dare say a poll would show that the vast majority doesn't
want to see you posting here. Will you respect the will of the
posters?
;)
Baroness Von Ficklescue| 3.15.10 @ 3:18PM
Silly Liberal! The Iraq War is one of the Obama Administration's
greatest achievements!
martin j smith| 3.15.10 @ 3:20PM
When polls are in the Democrat favor they are vital. Now that
they oppose them--who cares.
But the more important thing to grasp is this: We are not being
governed by a government elected by the people, buta regime that
is running our country ( into the ground ).
They will "pass" legislation anyway they want and if it
circumvents the constitution so much the better because they do
not want it. This country is governed by an Oligarchy similar to
any run of the mill totalitarian state. This is what has to be
understood. Obama is the figurehead.. When you see what is
happening in this light, you will grasp the truth.
ncatty| 3.15.10 @ 3:29PM
"The American people know what they want, and they deserve to get
it good and hard." (Mencken)
JP| 3.15.10 @ 3:37PM
And I dare say that the polls reflect what they voters do not
want -not what they do want.
Heatpacker| 3.15.10 @ 4:22PM
I learned some very interesting facts in this article.
1) Our elected representatives are not supposed to represent us.
They are supposed to do what is in our best interests.
2) Leadership in a democracy means opposing the will of the
people.
3) Polls are to be ignored when they tell a politician something
he doesn't want to know.
4) It takes courage to pass bad legislation.
5) When BHO says that 'The time for debate is over' he means that
it is time for everyone but him to shut up.
Darn it! All of that time in Government class wasted. It turns
out that everything I learned was wrong.
Liberal Reader| 3.15.10 @ 8:22PM
Mr Klein,
As you well know, these polls can be read in any number of ways.
The health care bills in Congress, in the polls, are very
unpopular. However, what people quoting the polls generally do
NOT mention is that a large number of people who don't like the
bills think they don't go far enough. The "public option" has
polled as high as 60% for the past year, yet I don't hear you
mentioning this kind of disapproval of the centrist bill now
being considered.
In addition, the constituent PARTS of this legislation are very
popular.
A majority of Americans like the benefits of the bill: they like
that preexisting conditions will be eliminated especially
(something like 80% of people approve of this in some polls).
To preserve the insurance system, eliminating discrimination
based on preexisting conditions (again, a very popular idea)
means everyone has to buy insurance, or else people will simply
wait until they are sick to purchase it. The insurance companies
have a point here, and the Democrats have listened.
I don't like the government telling people they HAVE to buy
insurance, but it's the bad result of a bad system. For-profit
health insurance is a BAD IDEA. It just doesn't work.
But so long as we're stuck with it, and we ARE stuck with it,
thanks to both political parties, we have to try to make it work.
Now, the reason these bills are so long and complicated is
because they are NOT government take-overs of health care.
If they were government take-overs, they'd be as long as Canada's
original bill: something like 18 pages could fit the policies
that would have simply included every American system in
Medicare, which is what we should have done.
Nick| 3.15.10 @ 8:55PM
Marxist Reader,
That's the American spirit!
"It's too hard to fix, so we can't."
If John Wayne were still alive, he'd slap you silly. He wouldn't
punch you, he only did that to men.
SoCon| 3.15.10 @ 10:20PM
"...he only did that to men." Haha, good one, Nick.
SoCon| 3.15.10 @ 10:17PM
I thought I smelled something bad. Where ya been, Lib Reader;
helping your corrupt liberal friends in congress pass more
unconstitutional legislation behind closed doors in the dead of
night on a holiday?
Ya know--all that TRANSPARENCY baloney Obama bleated about on the
campaign trail?
Stan Redmond| 3.16.10 @ 11:44AM
Partially I agree. 50% of the deadbeat tax sucking citizens that
pay no taxes want more free stuff given to them by the government
(paid for by productive tax paying citizens. Without the free
aspect of government provided payment for health 'care' these
people won't be happy. The other half who have to pay for these
deadbeats don't want any intrusion in to what we will be FORCED
to buy something we don't want, AND buy something for someone
else. Your condemnation of "for profit" health insurance is such
a bogus argument it is laughable. Insurance has worked just fine
until government busy bodies got their fingers stuck in the pie.
Why can't we buy over state lines? GOVERNMENT. Why does a healthy
childless man have to buy insurance that provides baby health
services, mental health services, gyncological services, holistic
medicine, and all the other nonsense REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT in
insurance plans? There's no choice in insurance and it is
incredibly high because OF GOVERNMENT!!! And now the GOVERNMENT
won't even give us the right to NOT have insurance.
Does it ever occur to big government progressive liberals that it
is their very own policies that cause these problems??? NEVER!
There has NEVER been one thing liberal policy has 'fixed.' And
the most disgusting part is the 50% of deadbeats that pay no
taxes keep voting these turds in to office to fix something they
broke in the first place only compounding the problems they
caused in the first place. "Flush out your headgear"
Liberal Reader| 3.15.10 @ 8:26PM
To clarify: We should simply expand Medicare gradually. It would
cost each American a heck of a lot less than 13,500 dollars per
year, the new average (which is constantly going up). The
infrastructure exists. Medicare is proven to work. And everyone
would be free of worrying about this issue forever. No more
bankruptcies because of illness; no more doctors bills. Higher
taxes, yes, but no more immobility based on one's need for health
insurance, an immobility that is surely paralyzing many in our
country today.
Flee| 3.15.10 @ 11:01PM
How about slowly ending Medicare and Medicaid rather than
expanding them? Give everyone, retirees included, more of what
they earned and get out of the business of health care. It is a
business and not something the govt needs to be involved with in
any way. That would be reform everyone could get behind. Unless
you are on the dole you would prefer taking care of yourself.
Since when is it the business of govt to eliminate all potential
suffering such as bankruptcy or foreclosure or bills they think
are too high? Get out of our lives and we will all be better off.
JP| 3.16.10 @ 9:20AM
The Medicare Trust Fund is due to go bankrupt sometime in 2018.
This nation simply doesn't have enough people or wealth to
support a $45 trillion unfunded liability -whether we go slowly
or not.
Grzmlyk| 3.16.10 @ 9:59AM
Liberal reader, you simply do not have one clue what you're
talking about. All of this is so much putatitve talk to you; your
world view is unsullied by empirical experience. You live in the
land of make believe.
There are only two kinds of liberals: Fools and crooks.
The fools think they have it all figured out, and failure after
failure after failure never convinces them that their blueprint
for a Better World - which hasn't changed since Bismark invented
the Welfare State almost 150 years ago - is fatally flawed.
And yet it is you liberal fools who believe you have evolved past
the selfish, greedy, primordial instincts of we knuckle-dragging
conservatives.
It is this very hubris that exposes the reality that you haven't
evolved past diapers when it comes to the facts of life.
For the life of me I do not understand why, in the face of
overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you time and again cling
bitterly to your keynesianism, your welfare states, your fetish
for government, your faith in bureaucracy. It is AMAZING.
The crooks are much easier to understand. They simply exploit the
fools for their own gain - which, ironically, proves it is they
who are selfish. Hence Wall Street's left-wing leanings. And
Hollywood's. And Corporate Welfare recipients.
I believe all foolish liberals should be sentened to live in the
world they prescribe for others. THAT is the social justice I'd
like to see.
Margie| 3.16.10 @ 8:46PM
"I believe all foolish liberals should be sentened to live in the
world they prescribe for others. THAT is the social justice I'd
like to see."
Perfect!
Gene| 3.15.10 @ 9:15PM
Lideral Reader,,,, Wow, what part of la la land do you live ,, I
may want to move there..
Liberal Reader| 3.15.10 @ 9:20PM
Look. No one's saying we WILL expand Medicare to include
everyone.
That would be wise, and sensible, and temperate, and just, and
compassionate. It would also make sense and be easily
accomplished.
So naturally, we're not going to do it. Don't worry, Nick. You'll
still be at the tender mercies of a privatized health care system
this time next year. It still will be wasteful, foolish, mean,
incompetent, crude, bogus, and ineffective. It still will drive
middle class people into bankruptcy. It still will fail to
contain costs. It just won't be so catastrophic for so many
people. You just might like it.
Anonymous| 3.15.10 @ 9:24PM
Destroy your freedom, wellbeing and wealth so ruling Democrats
can feel better about themselves? Why?
Liberal Reader| 3.15.10 @ 9:24PM
Or you can always join Rush Limbaugh in Costa Rica or the
Dominican Republic -- or whatever third world country he now says
he will get medical care in addition to prostitutes in.
Third world countries by and large do have free market health
care systems. I'm sure most of you would rather live in Guatemala
than France, Sweden, or Canada. I mean, we can't have socialism!
Oh no, that would be terrible.
Gene| 3.15.10 @ 9:38PM
Lib Reader : This does not even deserve a response.
SoCon| 3.15.10 @ 10:18PM
Trust me--the troll never deserves a response, unless you're
considering the one digit salute, of course!
Liberal Reader| 3.15.10 @ 10:49PM
Which part?
SoCon| 3.15.10 @ 11:24PM
Which part of what, bonehead?
George S| 3.15.10 @ 9:43PM
["I mean, the fact of the matter is, is the president has been on
his 60-day tour, and everywhere he goes the numbers just get
worse. The American people have essentially voted on this
proposal and really what you have is a situation now where I
think that the president and the Republican Congress are going to
need to figure out a way to save face and -- and step back a
little bit.'] - Senator Barack Obama as why Bush should give up
social security reform.
Liberal Reader| 3.15.10 @ 10:53PM
Hey, at least I TELL you what I'm for.
I'm FOR a government program that would make medical bills a
thing of the past for you and your family.
I don't ever want you or anyone to whom you are related to ever
do without medical care because you are too poor. I do not want
you to go broke or have to sell your house or take your kid out
of college because you get sick.
You can hate me for this, and revile me, and curse me and tell me
I'm an evil Nazi, but I won't change my mind.
Gene| 3.15.10 @ 11:11PM
Who do you think might pay for all this, maybe obama out of his
personal stash,wake up lib reader and come live in the real
world...
Nick| 3.15.10 @ 11:11PM
Marxist Reader,
You KNOW I don't hate you, or anyone else.
What you are "FOR" is an Utopian fantasy.
You can't claim that you "[...] don't ever want you or anyone to
whom you are related to ever do without medical care because you
are too poor", when, under ObamaCare, bureaucrats are going to
deny medical care to people.
Medical care is a SERVICE, not a right. Services are never free.
Someone has to pay.
SoCon| 3.15.10 @ 11:21PM
Lib Reader, YOU ARE AN EVIL NAZI but that's okay we don't hate
you for it. We are good Christians, after all--and we try to live
what we profess.
Margie| 3.16.10 @ 12:04AM
LibRead,
I don't hate you either. As for cursing you & calling you
names, etc, well you do that to us quite often and you are
extremely condescending. It's hard not to respond in kind. But
anyhow, I agree with Nick. And what I don't buy is that you don't
already KNOW it's wrong. Socialized medicine is wrong for so many
reasons but mostly because it is a complete and utter
redistribution of wealth. It is stealing from one's paycheck to
give to another, involuntarily.
Charity is one thing, and God loves a cheerful giver, but that is
voluntarily giving, not by a dictator type President who mandates
it.
~And lastly, I too will never change my mind, but will still hope
and pray for your conversion!
p.s. I've been wanting to ask you this question: Do you also post
as "Drew?"
Drew| 3.16.10 @ 12:50AM
Yes, I do. Clever ain't I?
Flee| 3.15.10 @ 11:05PM
Eliminate medical bills? Where are you going to get doctors in
this utopia of yours? Will they all be happy helping us all out
of the kindness of their hearts? Me and my family don't need or
want the help of the govt with our health care thank you very
much. That is the message that is being given to our so-called
leaders. They remain deaf to the message.
Nick| 3.15.10 @ 11:34PM
Marxist Reader,
Why did you stop trying to make the bogus case that Christ wants
all of us to pay more taxes to help the poor?
Was it because of these Bible verses?
"14When you have come into the land, which the Lord your God will
give you, and possess it, and shall say: I will set a king over
me, as all nations have that are round about [...] 16 And when he
is made king, [...] 17 He shall not have [...] immense sums of
silver and gold."
- Deuteronomy 17: 14,16-17
"14 And the weight of the gold that was brought to Solomon every
year [TAXES], was six hundred and sixty-six [666] talents of
gold: 15 Besides that which the men brought him that were over
the tributes, and the merchants, and they that sold by retail,
and all the kings of Arabia, and the governors of the
country."
- 1 Kings 10: 14-15
Teabag| 3.15.10 @ 11:51PM
Sorry, Liberal Reader, but your idea that Government-run health
care will keep us from going broke doesn't fly. The costs, via
soaring taxes on you and the rest of us, are projected to make
health care more expensive than private insurance - because WE
will then be paying, not just for ourselves, but for millions of
the currently uninsured. We need health care REFORM, not the
bogus bill before Congress.
fitness| 3.16.10 @ 2:13AM
Our website mainly wholesale mbt shoes, where you can buy a
variety of discount mbt shoes.You
can make a purchase online and buy mbt shoes with free
shipping.At the same time,you will enjoy more discount.
martin j smith| 3.16.10 @ 7:18AM
Dear Liberal; Reader: " have a nice day".
bostinks2| 3.16.10 @ 9:47AM
Polled 9.7% unemployed. i want to believe that these unemployed
would rather work to earn wealth which would enable the ability
to pay for more than just "adequate" healthcare. I would also
like to believe that these same unemployed are disillusioned with
the U.S. version of the Temple Mount that is the White House and
vote to restore the greatest country on earth. There are criminal
elements imposing a government run system that will harm citizens
more than help.
Bostinks2| 3.16.10 @ 10:27AM
Government run, socialist-style health care has been a dismal
failure everywhere it has been instituted. Proof: H1N1 is a
perfect example. In that one the scare was not warranted and
second, not only was a shortage of the vaccine, but some batches
were recalled at the expense and waste of millions of taxpayer
dollars. So .. how can a liberal justify that government
Healthcare for the masses works without wasteful spending or
forced closures of drug manufactures because they cant make a
profit. Liberals advocate less choice for the individual and more
centralized power and authority for the state in medical matters.
I prefer the establishment of tax free Health savings accounts
for individual healthcare.
Bostinks2 | 3.16.10 @ 10:46AM
I am 1 small individual that can be grouped into "the american
people" please dont include me as part of obamas imaginary group,
as his always adnausium, self induced poll of 95%ers who want
government run healthcare.
Texas conservative| 3.16.10 @ 12:08PM
I might have missed it, but is no one concerned about the ever
increasing national debt and its impact on future generations in
the name of nationalized health care that is sure to be more
costly and less effective? Liberal Reader, bottom line is that we
can't afford this...monetarily or in the price we are paying with
our individual freedoms.
The ghd hair straighteners have become extremely popular over
recent years.GHD hair straightener is the most popular irons for
curling or straightening hair.Sepecially, GHD IV Styler.What is
more,GHD hair straighteners are able to provide the perfect
solution to their needs. Every girls and women know that ghd hair
straighteners could be make them more beautiful.
S.L. Toddard| 3.15.10 @ 2:30PM
"“The American people want to know if it’s still possible for Washington to look out for their interests. For their future. So what they’re looking for is some courage. They’re waiting for us to act. They’re waiting for us to lead. They don’t want us putting our finger out to the wind. They don’t want us reading polls. They want us to look and see what is the best thing for America and then, do what’s right.”
I wonder if Mr. Klein exhibited this same reverence for the opinions of the American people (as exhibited in polls) when the Iraq War was revealed in poll after poll to be deeply unpopular with a vast majority of Americans.
Warrior| 3.15.10 @ 2:56PM
You have a reverse scenario here. When initiated, the Iraq war had good polling numbers only to steadily deteriorate as the war went longer. Here you have a bad poll numbers prior to the inception with an unknown of which direction they will go. I would guess that they start out bad and get worse once the taxes kick in and the economy continues to bog down. It won't help also when in a few years it becomes next to impossible to get a doctors appointment and we find out that it is a budget buster when neither party votes to remove the half a trillion dollars from medicare as proposed and the bill costs more than expected. However, that is speculation and only time will tell.
S.L. Toddard| 3.15.10 @ 3:44PM
I think we know which way they'll go - today's proposed entitlement program is tomorrow's untouchable "right". Much like they did with Social Security, Medicare et al, tomorrow's Republicans will defend tooth-and-nail today's progressive proposals should they become reality.
Warrior| 3.15.10 @ 5:13PM
Why call out the GOP? Once all this is bankrupted, it won't matter who defended it.
Gene| 3.15.10 @ 7:30PM
The half trillion come from cutting out medicare plus, which is real popular with those who have it ,they are taking it away from them and spending it to insure those "30 million uninsured" of which are 12 million illegal immagrants.
SoCon| 3.15.10 @ 10:09PM
The elderly and the infirm will be 'death paneled' by ObamaCare. Rationing of care will make sure of it.
Sarah was right.
KINGKID337| 3.25.10 @ 11:05AM
AND OFF!! OMG
Ken (Old Texican)| 3.15.10 @ 4:39PM
UH, Toddard
Do you believe in self defense or not?
Please don't quibble.
Do you or don't you?
You certainly defend yourself here every day with fightin' words. Are words your final solution, arse?
OK.
I just wanted to finally understand. You believe in verbally squawking, but don't have the testicular fortitude to take up a rifle and defend your principles...right?
OK,
You have obviously been protected by all of us neo-cons all your life, while you squawked at us. You sir, are a joke.
Crusader| 3.15.10 @ 8:56PM
Ken, I certainly believe in self-defense. However, building schools in Afghanistan and whatever it is we're doing in Iraq is NO WAY to for America to defend herself against islam (plain old islam, not "radical" or "facist," etc).
Gene| 3.15.10 @ 7:36PM
Mr. Toddard ,, you need to go take another sip of koolaid.
Tim| 3.15.10 @ 2:43PM
SL, I dare say a poll would show that the vast majority doesn't want to see you posting here. Will you respect the will of the posters?
;)
Baroness Von Ficklescue| 3.15.10 @ 3:18PM
Silly Liberal! The Iraq War is one of the Obama Administration's greatest achievements!
martin j smith| 3.15.10 @ 3:20PM
When polls are in the Democrat favor they are vital. Now that they oppose them--who cares.
But the more important thing to grasp is this: We are not being governed by a government elected by the people, buta regime that is running our country ( into the ground ).
They will "pass" legislation anyway they want and if it circumvents the constitution so much the better because they do not want it. This country is governed by an Oligarchy similar to any run of the mill totalitarian state. This is what has to be understood. Obama is the figurehead.. When you see what is happening in this light, you will grasp the truth.
ncatty| 3.15.10 @ 3:29PM
"The American people know what they want, and they deserve to get it good and hard." (Mencken)
JP| 3.15.10 @ 3:37PM
And I dare say that the polls reflect what they voters do not want -not what they do want.
Heatpacker| 3.15.10 @ 4:22PM
I learned some very interesting facts in this article.
1) Our elected representatives are not supposed to represent us. They are supposed to do what is in our best interests.
2) Leadership in a democracy means opposing the will of the people.
3) Polls are to be ignored when they tell a politician something he doesn't want to know.
4) It takes courage to pass bad legislation.
5) When BHO says that 'The time for debate is over' he means that it is time for everyone but him to shut up.
Darn it! All of that time in Government class wasted. It turns out that everything I learned was wrong.
Liberal Reader| 3.15.10 @ 8:22PM
Mr Klein,
As you well know, these polls can be read in any number of ways.
The health care bills in Congress, in the polls, are very unpopular. However, what people quoting the polls generally do NOT mention is that a large number of people who don't like the bills think they don't go far enough. The "public option" has polled as high as 60% for the past year, yet I don't hear you mentioning this kind of disapproval of the centrist bill now being considered.
In addition, the constituent PARTS of this legislation are very popular.
A majority of Americans like the benefits of the bill: they like that preexisting conditions will be eliminated especially (something like 80% of people approve of this in some polls).
To preserve the insurance system, eliminating discrimination based on preexisting conditions (again, a very popular idea) means everyone has to buy insurance, or else people will simply wait until they are sick to purchase it. The insurance companies have a point here, and the Democrats have listened.
I don't like the government telling people they HAVE to buy insurance, but it's the bad result of a bad system. For-profit health insurance is a BAD IDEA. It just doesn't work.
But so long as we're stuck with it, and we ARE stuck with it, thanks to both political parties, we have to try to make it work.
Now, the reason these bills are so long and complicated is because they are NOT government take-overs of health care.
If they were government take-overs, they'd be as long as Canada's original bill: something like 18 pages could fit the policies that would have simply included every American system in Medicare, which is what we should have done.
Nick| 3.15.10 @ 8:55PM
Marxist Reader,
That's the American spirit!
"It's too hard to fix, so we can't."
If John Wayne were still alive, he'd slap you silly. He wouldn't punch you, he only did that to men.
SoCon| 3.15.10 @ 10:20PM
"...he only did that to men." Haha, good one, Nick.
SoCon| 3.15.10 @ 10:17PM
I thought I smelled something bad. Where ya been, Lib Reader; helping your corrupt liberal friends in congress pass more unconstitutional legislation behind closed doors in the dead of night on a holiday?
Ya know--all that TRANSPARENCY baloney Obama bleated about on the campaign trail?
Stan Redmond| 3.16.10 @ 11:44AM
Partially I agree. 50% of the deadbeat tax sucking citizens that pay no taxes want more free stuff given to them by the government (paid for by productive tax paying citizens. Without the free aspect of government provided payment for health 'care' these people won't be happy. The other half who have to pay for these deadbeats don't want any intrusion in to what we will be FORCED to buy something we don't want, AND buy something for someone else. Your condemnation of "for profit" health insurance is such a bogus argument it is laughable. Insurance has worked just fine until government busy bodies got their fingers stuck in the pie. Why can't we buy over state lines? GOVERNMENT. Why does a healthy childless man have to buy insurance that provides baby health services, mental health services, gyncological services, holistic medicine, and all the other nonsense REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT in insurance plans? There's no choice in insurance and it is incredibly high because OF GOVERNMENT!!! And now the GOVERNMENT won't even give us the right to NOT have insurance.
Does it ever occur to big government progressive liberals that it is their very own policies that cause these problems??? NEVER! There has NEVER been one thing liberal policy has 'fixed.' And the most disgusting part is the 50% of deadbeats that pay no taxes keep voting these turds in to office to fix something they broke in the first place only compounding the problems they caused in the first place. "Flush out your headgear"
Liberal Reader| 3.15.10 @ 8:26PM
To clarify: We should simply expand Medicare gradually. It would cost each American a heck of a lot less than 13,500 dollars per year, the new average (which is constantly going up). The infrastructure exists. Medicare is proven to work. And everyone would be free of worrying about this issue forever. No more bankruptcies because of illness; no more doctors bills. Higher taxes, yes, but no more immobility based on one's need for health insurance, an immobility that is surely paralyzing many in our country today.
Flee| 3.15.10 @ 11:01PM
How about slowly ending Medicare and Medicaid rather than expanding them? Give everyone, retirees included, more of what they earned and get out of the business of health care. It is a business and not something the govt needs to be involved with in any way. That would be reform everyone could get behind. Unless you are on the dole you would prefer taking care of yourself. Since when is it the business of govt to eliminate all potential suffering such as bankruptcy or foreclosure or bills they think are too high? Get out of our lives and we will all be better off.
JP| 3.16.10 @ 9:20AM
The Medicare Trust Fund is due to go bankrupt sometime in 2018. This nation simply doesn't have enough people or wealth to support a $45 trillion unfunded liability -whether we go slowly or not.
Grzmlyk| 3.16.10 @ 9:59AM
Liberal reader, you simply do not have one clue what you're talking about. All of this is so much putatitve talk to you; your world view is unsullied by empirical experience. You live in the land of make believe.
There are only two kinds of liberals: Fools and crooks.
The fools think they have it all figured out, and failure after failure after failure never convinces them that their blueprint for a Better World - which hasn't changed since Bismark invented the Welfare State almost 150 years ago - is fatally flawed.
And yet it is you liberal fools who believe you have evolved past the selfish, greedy, primordial instincts of we knuckle-dragging conservatives.
It is this very hubris that exposes the reality that you haven't evolved past diapers when it comes to the facts of life.
For the life of me I do not understand why, in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you time and again cling bitterly to your keynesianism, your welfare states, your fetish for government, your faith in bureaucracy. It is AMAZING.
The crooks are much easier to understand. They simply exploit the fools for their own gain - which, ironically, proves it is they who are selfish. Hence Wall Street's left-wing leanings. And Hollywood's. And Corporate Welfare recipients.
I believe all foolish liberals should be sentened to live in the world they prescribe for others. THAT is the social justice I'd like to see.
Margie| 3.16.10 @ 8:46PM
"I believe all foolish liberals should be sentened to live in the world they prescribe for others. THAT is the social justice I'd like to see."
Perfect!
Gene| 3.15.10 @ 9:15PM
Lideral Reader,,,, Wow, what part of la la land do you live ,, I may want to move there..
Liberal Reader| 3.15.10 @ 9:20PM
Look. No one's saying we WILL expand Medicare to include everyone.
That would be wise, and sensible, and temperate, and just, and compassionate. It would also make sense and be easily accomplished.
So naturally, we're not going to do it. Don't worry, Nick. You'll still be at the tender mercies of a privatized health care system this time next year. It still will be wasteful, foolish, mean, incompetent, crude, bogus, and ineffective. It still will drive middle class people into bankruptcy. It still will fail to contain costs. It just won't be so catastrophic for so many people. You just might like it.
Anonymous| 3.15.10 @ 9:24PM
Destroy your freedom, wellbeing and wealth so ruling Democrats can feel better about themselves? Why?
Liberal Reader| 3.15.10 @ 9:24PM
Or you can always join Rush Limbaugh in Costa Rica or the Dominican Republic -- or whatever third world country he now says he will get medical care in addition to prostitutes in.
Third world countries by and large do have free market health care systems. I'm sure most of you would rather live in Guatemala than France, Sweden, or Canada. I mean, we can't have socialism! Oh no, that would be terrible.
Gene| 3.15.10 @ 9:38PM
Lib Reader : This does not even deserve a response.
SoCon| 3.15.10 @ 10:18PM
Trust me--the troll never deserves a response, unless you're considering the one digit salute, of course!
Liberal Reader| 3.15.10 @ 10:49PM
Which part?
SoCon| 3.15.10 @ 11:24PM
Which part of what, bonehead?
George S| 3.15.10 @ 9:43PM
["I mean, the fact of the matter is, is the president has been on his 60-day tour, and everywhere he goes the numbers just get worse. The American people have essentially voted on this proposal and really what you have is a situation now where I think that the president and the Republican Congress are going to need to figure out a way to save face and -- and step back a little bit.'] - Senator Barack Obama as why Bush should give up social security reform.
Liberal Reader| 3.15.10 @ 10:53PM
Hey, at least I TELL you what I'm for.
I'm FOR a government program that would make medical bills a thing of the past for you and your family.
I don't ever want you or anyone to whom you are related to ever do without medical care because you are too poor. I do not want you to go broke or have to sell your house or take your kid out of college because you get sick.
You can hate me for this, and revile me, and curse me and tell me I'm an evil Nazi, but I won't change my mind.
Gene| 3.15.10 @ 11:11PM
Who do you think might pay for all this, maybe obama out of his personal stash,wake up lib reader and come live in the real world...
Nick| 3.15.10 @ 11:11PM
Marxist Reader,
You KNOW I don't hate you, or anyone else.
What you are "FOR" is an Utopian fantasy.
You can't claim that you "[...] don't ever want you or anyone to whom you are related to ever do without medical care because you are too poor", when, under ObamaCare, bureaucrats are going to deny medical care to people.
Medical care is a SERVICE, not a right. Services are never free. Someone has to pay.
SoCon| 3.15.10 @ 11:21PM
Lib Reader, YOU ARE AN EVIL NAZI but that's okay we don't hate you for it. We are good Christians, after all--and we try to live what we profess.
Margie| 3.16.10 @ 12:04AM
LibRead,
I don't hate you either. As for cursing you & calling you names, etc, well you do that to us quite often and you are extremely condescending. It's hard not to respond in kind. But anyhow, I agree with Nick. And what I don't buy is that you don't already KNOW it's wrong. Socialized medicine is wrong for so many reasons but mostly because it is a complete and utter redistribution of wealth. It is stealing from one's paycheck to give to another, involuntarily.
Charity is one thing, and God loves a cheerful giver, but that is voluntarily giving, not by a dictator type President who mandates it.
~And lastly, I too will never change my mind, but will still hope and pray for your conversion!
p.s. I've been wanting to ask you this question: Do you also post as "Drew?"
Drew| 3.16.10 @ 12:50AM
Yes, I do. Clever ain't I?
Flee| 3.15.10 @ 11:05PM
Eliminate medical bills? Where are you going to get doctors in this utopia of yours? Will they all be happy helping us all out of the kindness of their hearts? Me and my family don't need or want the help of the govt with our health care thank you very much. That is the message that is being given to our so-called leaders. They remain deaf to the message.
Nick| 3.15.10 @ 11:34PM
Marxist Reader,
Why did you stop trying to make the bogus case that Christ wants all of us to pay more taxes to help the poor?
Was it because of these Bible verses?
"14When you have come into the land, which the Lord your God will give you, and possess it, and shall say: I will set a king over me, as all nations have that are round about [...] 16 And when he is made king, [...] 17 He shall not have [...] immense sums of silver and gold."
- Deuteronomy 17: 14,16-17
"14 And the weight of the gold that was brought to Solomon every year [TAXES], was six hundred and sixty-six [666] talents of gold: 15 Besides that which the men brought him that were over the tributes, and the merchants, and they that sold by retail, and all the kings of Arabia, and the governors of the country."
- 1 Kings 10: 14-15
Teabag| 3.15.10 @ 11:51PM
Sorry, Liberal Reader, but your idea that Government-run health care will keep us from going broke doesn't fly. The costs, via soaring taxes on you and the rest of us, are projected to make health care more expensive than private insurance - because WE will then be paying, not just for ourselves, but for millions of the currently uninsured. We need health care REFORM, not the bogus bill before Congress.
fitness| 3.16.10 @ 2:13AM
Our website mainly wholesale mbt shoes, where you can buy a variety of discount mbt shoes.You can make a purchase online and buy mbt shoes with free shipping.At the same time,you will enjoy more discount.
martin j smith| 3.16.10 @ 7:18AM
Dear Liberal; Reader: " have a nice day".
bostinks2| 3.16.10 @ 9:47AM
Polled 9.7% unemployed. i want to believe that these unemployed would rather work to earn wealth which would enable the ability to pay for more than just "adequate" healthcare. I would also like to believe that these same unemployed are disillusioned with the U.S. version of the Temple Mount that is the White House and vote to restore the greatest country on earth. There are criminal elements imposing a government run system that will harm citizens more than help.
Bostinks2| 3.16.10 @ 10:27AM
Government run, socialist-style health care has been a dismal failure everywhere it has been instituted. Proof: H1N1 is a perfect example. In that one the scare was not warranted and second, not only was a shortage of the vaccine, but some batches were recalled at the expense and waste of millions of taxpayer dollars. So .. how can a liberal justify that government Healthcare for the masses works without wasteful spending or forced closures of drug manufactures because they cant make a profit. Liberals advocate less choice for the individual and more centralized power and authority for the state in medical matters. I prefer the establishment of tax free Health savings accounts for individual healthcare.
Bostinks2 | 3.16.10 @ 10:46AM
I am 1 small individual that can be grouped into "the american people" please dont include me as part of obamas imaginary group, as his always adnausium, self induced poll of 95%ers who want government run healthcare.
Texas conservative| 3.16.10 @ 12:08PM
I might have missed it, but is no one concerned about the ever increasing national debt and its impact on future generations in the name of nationalized health care that is sure to be more costly and less effective? Liberal Reader, bottom line is that we can't afford this...monetarily or in the price we are paying with our individual freedoms.
higgins1990| 3.16.10 @ 1:29PM
President Clueless.
ghdshop| 3.28.10 @ 11:38PM
The ghd hair straighteners have become extremely popular over recent years.GHD hair straightener is the most popular irons for curling or straightening hair.Sepecially, GHD IV Styler.What is more,GHD hair straighteners are able to provide the perfect solution to their needs. Every girls and women know that ghd hair straighteners could be make them more beautiful.