The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

The Congressional Budget Office on Monday said that it did not have enough details to provide a cost estimate of President Obama's health care proposal.

Earlier this afternoon, CBO Director Doug Elmendorf wrote on the office's blog:

This morning the Obama Administration released a description of its health care proposal, and CBO has already received several requests to provide a cost estimate for that proposal. We had not previously received the proposal, and we have just begun the process of reviewing it-a process that will take some time, given the complexity of the issues involved. Although the proposal reflects many elements that were included in the health care bills passed by the House and the Senate last year, it modifies many of those elements and also includes new ones. Moreover, preparing a cost estimate requires very detailed specifications of numerous provisions, and the materials that were released this morning do not provide sufficient detail on all of the provisions. Therefore, CBO cannot provide a cost estimate for the proposal without additional detail, and, even if such detail were provided, analyzing the proposal would be a time-consuming process that could not be completed this week.

Earlier today, I explained why the proposal would be significantly more expensive than the Senate bill. The Hill reports that, "The enhanced tax credits and Medicaid spending would total about $75 billion over 10 years."

View all comments (12) | Leave a comment

Siegfried X| 2.23.10 @ 7:24AM

Double standard. This is the same thing Obama criticized the House Republican proposal about.

Tenn Slim| 2.23.10 @ 9:02AM

Opine
I went out to the White House Gov PR post. NO one could make any economic sense out of the information. Clearly a PR post, designed to obscure hard fiscal facts.
end
Semper FI

Stan Redmond| 2.23.10 @ 11:08AM

Shame on all you evyil greedy republicans and conservatives. How can you put a price on the healthcare of our children, women, minorities, and the uninsured? Any amount of government spending that insures all citizens legal and otherwise, is a small price to pay to guarentee fairness.

Blech. It makes me ill thinking like a liberal even in sarcasm.

Yosemeti Sam| 2.23.10 @ 11:22AM

Re column - "Is our Children Learning?"

To American Spectator:

Appears I strike Liberal/Leftist nerves.

Do you or do you not validate email addresses
with posts?

You let an asshole - pardon the shorthand -
speak as if he were me.

Get your AS act together!

Do you have hacker firewalls - at all?

If not - moving on!

AS Webmaster - what's up with this compromise?

pamela| 4.12.10 @ 9:33AM

geat one...kamagra

pamela| 4.13.10 @ 9:54AM

Shame on all you evyil greedy republicans and conservatives. How can you put a price on the healthcare of our children, women, minorities, and the uninsured? Any amount of government spending that insures all citizens legal and otherwise, is a small price to pay to guarentee fairness. youtube to mp3

pamela| 4.15.10 @ 11:51AM

You obviously need a little insight. TEachers get zero perks. They end up spending personal money to buy simple things the school should be paying for such as copy paper. My son came home last March and proclaimed that his school had ran out of copy paper for the rest of the year.Search Toolbar

pamela| 4.18.10 @ 12:35PM

Overall, Things is very good. You didn't mention that there is a desktop program that syncs between an iPhone or iPod Touch. The desktop program is still a beta, so some issues remain. Personalised Sweets

pamela| 4.20.10 @ 12:10AM

Get your AS act together! Download kesha mp3

pricila| 4.26.10 @ 1:32AM

As it is, however, he is so over the top radical/progressive that he will eventually succeed in running himself and the rest of his party out of town. We just need to minimize the damage before that day comes. online shopping cart

jane| 5.1.10 @ 12:22PM

It is crucial that transparent categorisation procedures and objectives following clear criteria are applied. badge games

Harvey| 5.15.12 @ 11:43AM

You really couldn't make it up could you, conservatives and republicans will always need to use them Fast.
>kamagra

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/02/22/cbo-says-it-doesnt-have-enough

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Sulllivan Silliness

Ross Kaminsky | 5:40PM

Meghan McCain Doesn't Get It

Jeffrey Lord | 1:36PM

The Paul Factor

W. James Antle, III | 1:29PM

Bain v. Solyndra

W. James Antle, III | 12:11PM

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

The White House Sieve

Jed Babbin | 5.29.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Osceola Who?

Reid Collins | 5.29.12

The Bain of Romney's Existence

W. James Antle | 5.29.12

ADVERTISEMENT