In case you’ve learned nothing from history: tyrannical
dictators (Hitler, Stalin, Ahmadinejad) tend to, what we
call, speak in half, no, near-zero truths.
Yet, some Administrations fear that the likes of
Ahmadinejad are just prone to puffery:
“We do not believe they have the capability to enrich to
the degree they say they are enriching,” White House Press
Secretary Robert Gibbs said at last Thursday’s daily
briefing.
Story from
The Hill :
An International Atomic Energy Agency report
expresses worry that Iran may be working on a nuclear
warhead, despite a 2007 U.S. intelligence assessment that found
the Islamic Republic stopped such work in
2003.
The United Nations’ nuclear watchdog also confirmed that
Iran had indeed enriched uranium to nearly 20 percent, a claim
made by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during revolutionary
anniversary festivities last week but rebuffed by the White
House.
I never thought I’d say this, I think I’m inclined
to believe the United Nations.
Now what.
Ken (Old Texican)| 2.18.10 @ 6:27PM
UHHH...first, learn the difference between Iraq and Iran perhaps?
Ken (Old Texican)| 2.18.10 @ 6:34PM
OKOK! I'm sorry, Robert. I could not resist. heh.
to answer your question of "Now what?"
I did a double take on your blog title and got a chuckle.
Perhaps I won't feel so bad the next time I have a senior moment.
At the same time, I wouldn't believe the United Thugs of the world any more than I would believe the Thugs in DC.
Al Adab| 2.18.10 @ 6:46PM
Ken,
Glad to see you are still active. For a minute I feared maybe it was you in Austin wasting a good Belanca. Glad it wasn't. Heh. :)
Bush could have taken this problem down three years ago, just as Clinton could have settled with N. Korea back in the 90's. Now the problem is much more serious. Can't expect others to do our dirty work for us this time.
BTW saw the PPI site the other day. Great company.
Ken (Old Texican)| 2.18.10 @ 7:16PM
Naw, Al Adab,
I'm not a kamikazi. I'm from the George Patton school of thought. (your job is to make the other SOB die for...)
Thank you re PPI. we have 44 offices coast to coast now. Check us out on youtube with appropriate search terms.
MikeN| 2.18.10 @ 6:48PM
Barbra Streisand loves this article.
PCC| 2.18.10 @ 7:31PM
Iran, Iraq....what's the difference?
Winston | 2.19.10 @ 3:07AM
Iraq? Is this a post from 2002-03? Don't you have online editors and proof readers?
winston | 2.19.10 @ 3:08AM
http://twitter.com/AmSpec/status/9306121013
Awful... Don't you have online editors?
Tenn Slim| 2.19.10 @ 6:44AM
All
Opin
Re Iran, nucs and possibles.
1. Iran can and will make Nucs. It is a natural end result from processing U238.
2. Delivery systems are on line, tested, and alive.
3. Motivation to use the systems, the Nucs, and the available targets are in place.
bt
It does not take a genius, a UN agency nor a sleeping OBNA to understand that the clock is ticking. One day we will be " surprised" that the Iran Leadership has quietly eliminated Israel,
Now What???
end
Semper Fi
We Will Prevail.
bob s| 2.19.10 @ 12:59PM
Tenn- the fissible isotope of Uranium is U235, not U238. U238 is the most common isotope of Uranium, the stuff that enriching tries to separate from the "good stuff".