The Evansville Courier & Press is
reporting that second-term Congressman Brad Ellsworth
(D-Ind.) will run for Sen. Evan Bayh's (D-Ind.) seat this year.
The Indiana Democratic Party's 32-member central committee is set
to pick a replacement for Bayh in the general election, as he
withdrew without giving anyone time to gather signatures to
replace him on the primary ballot.
On paper, Ellsworth would be a strong candidate. He will run on a
pro-life, pro-gun, anti-amnesty for illegal immigrants platform,
defusing some of the hot-button issues Republicans could use
against him. He has already won twice in the "Bloody Eighth," one
of Indiana's swing districts. And he has already beaten one of
the candidates running for the Republican nomination, former
Congressman John Hostettler, by a landslide 61 percent to 39
percent margin in 2006.
Here's the downside: In 2006, Ellsworth was sheriff in
Vanderburgh County and had no legislative voting record. Now he
has one that includes votes for the $787 billion stimulus
package and the House Democratic
health care bill -- afte compromises in both cases, true, but
neither bill was popular as passed. Second, Ellsworth got to run
against George W. Bush in 2006. In 2010, the Republicans will be
running against Barack Obama.
Accordingly, a
Rasmussen poll already shows both Ellsworth and Congressman
Baron Hill (D-Ind.) getting trounced by all three declared
Republicans (hat tip: Swing State Project). Ellsworth actually
fares worse in a rematch against Hostettler, taking just 27
percent of the vote, than he does against former Sen. Dan Coats.
Some of this comes down to who Rasmussen thinks will turn out --
their polls showed Evan Bayh in trouble while Daily Kos/Research
2000 showed him safe, all based on different turnout assumptions
-- but there are good reasons to think that the 2010 electorate
will be more conservative than the 2008 voters who narrowly
delivered Indiana to Obama.
Finally, House Democrats are worried that they'll
lose Ellsworth's seat if he runs for Senate rather than for
reelection in the Eighth Congressional District.
all of the horses and all of the men cannot put barak obama
together again....
i'd rather fall just short of taking the senate in 2010...then
the kook party will have to continue to follow barak over the
cliff...and since the dems hold 23 of the 33 seats up in 2012,
the republican takeover is almost assured.
Enoch Powell's Revenge| 2.18.10 @ 3:21PM
Mr. Antle, I read your excellent recent Vdare column regarding
the Indiana Senate race, Rep. Hostettler, and the prospects of an
immigration moratorium with great interest: http://www.vdare.com/antle/100215_hostettler.htm
However, I have yet to see you write anything about a moratorium
on legal immigration in the American Spectator. Is there a gag
rule in force? For many conservatives, immigration restriction is
issue #1. There is no issue more important to us than putting an
end to the mass immigration that has been destroying the American
nation since this destructive policy was imposed by LBJ as part
of his "great society" scheme. There will soon be no America left
if this madness is not stopped.
Besides, among republican voters, an immigration cutoff would be
an extremely popular vote getter. What gives?
JP| 2.18.10 @ 3:44PM
With unemployment still above the national average, Ellsworth
will have a big problem in Hoosierland.
ggoblue| 2.18.10 @ 2:07PM
all of the horses and all of the men cannot put barak obama together again....
i'd rather fall just short of taking the senate in 2010...then the kook party will have to continue to follow barak over the cliff...and since the dems hold 23 of the 33 seats up in 2012, the republican takeover is almost assured.
Enoch Powell's Revenge| 2.18.10 @ 3:21PM
Mr. Antle, I read your excellent recent Vdare column regarding the Indiana Senate race, Rep. Hostettler, and the prospects of an immigration moratorium with great interest:
http://www.vdare.com/antle/100215_hostettler.htm
However, I have yet to see you write anything about a moratorium on legal immigration in the American Spectator. Is there a gag rule in force? For many conservatives, immigration restriction is issue #1. There is no issue more important to us than putting an end to the mass immigration that has been destroying the American nation since this destructive policy was imposed by LBJ as part of his "great society" scheme. There will soon be no America left if this madness is not stopped.
Besides, among republican voters, an immigration cutoff would be an extremely popular vote getter. What gives?
JP| 2.18.10 @ 3:44PM
With unemployment still above the national average, Ellsworth will have a big problem in Hoosierland.