Leaving aside the junk science that has bedeviled the global
warming network of activists over the past few weeks, there are
also questions of corruption that deserve greater scrutiny and
attention.
Dr. Rajendra K. Pachauri, Chairman of the U.N. Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been called for conflicts of
interest involving his work as an adviser to several companies,
even as The New York Times allows him to
explain this away.
In other news, Richard Cabrera, an “independent expert” appointed
by an Ecuadorean court to research plaintiff claims against
Chevron has what appears to be disqualifying conflict of
interest. Cabrera is largely responsible for elevating the
damages against Chevron to $27 billion.
Public records show Cabrera is co-founder, general manager, and
legal representative of an oilfield remediation company, CAMPET,
which is a contractor to Ecuador’s state-owned oil company
PetroEcuador that stands to profit from a verdict against
Chevron.
As this could be the largest environmental lawsuit in history,
this is a story that is sure to gain momentum. Chevron has a
press
release discussing this revelation. If Cabrera did indeed
collaborate with plaintiffs who are positioned to benefit
financially from the lawsuit, the case is likely to collapse.
It would be interesting to see how Cabrera and other lawsuit
happy green activists respond.
Nick| 2.17.10 @ 1:50PM
For all you AGW Hoaxers out there who think "scientists" check their humanity at the door, when they put on their white lab coats, and are incapable of lying, cheating, and stealing to make money; I hope these latest revelations about Cabrera have made you see the light.
Pingback| 2.17.10 @ 2:20PM
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : The Mount Vernon Statement (mount vernon statem links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 2.18.10 @ 8:11AM
Documents Show Conflict in Green Suit Against Chevron « The Chevron Ecuador Lawsuit C links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Tom| 2.18.10 @ 12:59PM
Is The American Spectator planning an expose of denialist funding sources anytime soon? You might want to start with ExxonMobil and the Heartland Institute, and then move on to their clearly politically motivated 'Foundation' funding...
http://www.sourcewatch.org/ind....._Institute
350-030 | 4.19.10 @ 5:14AM
good read thanks for the share
640-802 | 4.19.10 @ 5:15AM
good read thanks for the share