Evan Bayh's retirement does strike a huge blow to Democratic
hopes of retaining that Indiana Senate seat this fall. But Bayh's
announcement was timed to minimize the damage for Democrats. Bayh
waited until the day before signatures are due to qualify for the
state primary ballots. That means the state Democratic party
bosses will get to pick their own candidate rather than take the
chance that a liberal primary electorate will nominate a Democrat
too far to the left to win. And it also probably freezes the
Republican field in place, preventing Mike Pence or Mitch Daniels
from taking another look.
That may not be enough to keep Republicans from taking the seat.
Evan Bayh was the Democrats' strongest candidate by far and his
decision to retire suggests -- protestations to the contrary
aside -- that even he wasn't sure he could keep the seat. While a
Daily Kos/Research 2000 poll showed Bayh in good shape, it
assumed a 2008-like electorate. An earlier Rasmussen poll making
different assumptions showed Bayh losing to Pence and barely
ahead of John Hostettler. Nevertheless, Bayh did try to make the
best of a bad situation for Democrats.
You're the ONLY pundit I've read who thinks Bayh did the Dems a
favor. All the others (Ed Morrissey, Rick Moran, etc) disagree
and feel it will only hurt the Dems. Guess we'll see who's right.
ggoblue| 2.15.10 @ 7:34PM
as long as he was leaving doing it 'last minute' was a favor.
a] they get to hand pick their candidate and bypass them pesky
voters
I don't think Bayh did the Democrats a favor by leaving -- his
departure makes it much more likely that they'll lose that Senate
seat. But the way he left at the last minute does help them
contain the damage.
Had Bayh announced this earlier, the Democrats might have gotten
stuck with a more liberal nominee and a stronger Republican might
have entered the race.
Once I heard that Rahm was involved, something simple would
become obtuse. If d’Ippolito manages to get enough signatures
together in time. and gets the Dem nod, Rahm may be too clever by
twice. Heard she was 1000 short.
Kate| 2.15.10 @ 6:25PM
You're the ONLY pundit I've read who thinks Bayh did the Dems a favor. All the others (Ed Morrissey, Rick Moran, etc) disagree and feel it will only hurt the Dems. Guess we'll see who's right.
ggoblue| 2.15.10 @ 7:34PM
as long as he was leaving doing it 'last minute' was a favor.
a] they get to hand pick their candidate and bypass them pesky voters
b] let the bidding begin on the nomination.....
W. James Antle III| 2.16.10 @ 4:30PM
I don't think Bayh did the Democrats a favor by leaving -- his departure makes it much more likely that they'll lose that Senate seat. But the way he left at the last minute does help them contain the damage.
Had Bayh announced this earlier, the Democrats might have gotten stuck with a more liberal nominee and a stronger Republican might have entered the race.
Bunkerville| 2.16.10 @ 12:16PM
Once I heard that Rahm was involved, something simple would become obtuse. If d’Ippolito manages to get enough signatures together in time. and gets the Dem nod, Rahm may be too clever by twice. Heard she was 1000 short.
http://bunkerville.wordpress.c.....nate-race/