Yesterday, I
noted that in post-Scott Brown victory chaos, members of the
House and Senate were each saying that the ball was in the court
of the other chamber. Given this, you'd think President Obama
would want to take charge of the situation before his top
domestic priority unravels. But instead, in his news conference
this afternoon, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs passed
the buck to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.
"They’ve
got to figure out a path forward legislatively,” Gibbs said.
"Each of them knows their chambers better than anybody
else."
At the same time, Gibbs insisted that a comprehensive health care
bill would pass, even though he wouldn't elaborate on what
President Obama meant when he said that Congress should unite
around the "core elements."
"The president believes it is the exact right thing to do by
giving this some time,” he
also said, "by letting the dust settle and looking for the
best path forward."
Meanwhile, today President Obama spoke
to announce new regulations on the big banks and called for a
"forceful
response" to today's Supreme Court decision -- both of which
suggest he's eager to pivot to issues that would allow him to tap
into populist anger that he's convinced fueled Brown's election.
The prospect that Brown could win the Senate election and change
the political calculus in Washington was evident at least a week
and a half before it actually happened. That's why it's
incredible that the White House had absolutely no plan in place
to manage the aftermath, allowing chaos to reign among Democrats,
and all sorts of mixed messages to be spread. This is, I think, a
good example of what happens when you elect somebody without
executive experience.
He lacks executive experience, all right. Is the same true for
his chief of staff and legions of advisors?
Scarlette| 1.21.10 @ 5:24PM
Why would Obama have a plan in place to manage the aftermath of a
loss since in his own mind he is never going to lose. He doesn't
seem to learn from experience.
SteveP| 1.21.10 @ 6:14PM
Obama voted present again. Gee, who'd a thunk it?
And then the "pragmatist" (read unprincipled opportunist) tried
to tap into populist anger by misunderstanding what's going on
and proposing more fascism.
Has there ever been anyone more tone deaf in American politics?
ncatty| 1.21.10 @ 5:07PM
He lacks executive experience, all right. Is the same true for his chief of staff and legions of advisors?
Scarlette| 1.21.10 @ 5:24PM
Why would Obama have a plan in place to manage the aftermath of a loss since in his own mind he is never going to lose. He doesn't seem to learn from experience.
SteveP| 1.21.10 @ 6:14PM
Obama voted present again. Gee, who'd a thunk it?
And then the "pragmatist" (read unprincipled opportunist) tried to tap into populist anger by misunderstanding what's going on and proposing more fascism.
Has there ever been anyone more tone deaf in American politics?