The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Earlier this month, we heard a lot of talk about how the Democrats were bypassing a formal conference committee to merge the two bills and simply doing closed door talks and "ping ponging" the bills betwen the two chambers.

But now, in the wake of Scott Brown's victory in Massachusetts, the Democrats are engaging in a bit of rhetorical "ping pong," with members in each chamber saying the ball was in the other chamber's court.

Earlier today, Brian Beutler reported that:

After an early morning meeting today, members of the Senate Democratic leadership said outright what many suspected after last night's election: The fate of health care rests with the House.

And then this afternoon, the Greg Sargent reported this:

In a private meeting in the Capitol just now, a dozen or more House liberals bluntly told Nancy Pelosi that there was no chance that they would vote to pass the Senate bill in its current form - making it all but certain that House Dems won't opt for this approach, a top House liberal tells me.

"We cannot support the Senate bill - period," is the message that liberals delivered to the Speaker, Dem Rep Raul Grijalva told me in an interview just now.

He also picked up on a growing resentment among House members for the deference shown to the Senate:

For instance, Grijalva said, why not send the Senate individual bills that would, among other things, nix the "Cadillac" tax or close the donut hole, pressuring the Senate to deal with each provision separately?

"If the Senate chooses not to close the donut hole, that's their damn problem," Grijalva said. "They've had it too easy. One vote controls everything. Collectively, we're tired of that."

View all comments (2) | Leave a comment

Warrior| 1.20.10 @ 5:51PM

On a separate issue, Mr. Grijalva is also calling for new episodes of Sponge Bob Square Pants to be produced.

PCC| 1.20.10 @ 7:34PM

That's funny, Warrior.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/01/20/a-different-kind-of-ping-pong

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT