Another interesting finding in the Suffolk poll Jim noted below is
that it finds 51 percent of those surveryed in deep blue
Massachusetts say they oppose the Democrats' health care bill,
while 61 percent say they don't think the federal government can
afford to pay for it. It's quite a stunning development that in
the race to fill the seat once held by Ted "health care is the
cause of my life" Kennedy, a majority of those polled now say
they oppose the legislation he championed.
Interestingly, they also find that 54 percent of those polled
support the Massachusetts health care plan, even though 62
percent say the state can't afford it. This would seem to be in
line with how Brown has been trying to position himself -- by
saying he supports Romneycare, but doesn't think people in
Massachusetts who are already paying for a near-universal health
care system should be forced to pay for one for the rest of the
country.
Let's also remember that Massachusetts is home to a number of
companies that produce medical equipment - these same companies
will be heavily taxed under Obamacare and a lot of jobs may
therefore be lost in the state. How's that for irony?
Tim| 1.15.10 @ 12:21PM
Apparently what they teach you at Harvard is that the best way to
make medical care more affordable is to tax all of the
constituent pieces more. Much more.
CF Mother| 1.15.10 @ 3:36PM
Questions for those who do not support health care reform:
Twenty years ago our cheery toddler was diagnosed with cystic
fibrosis. Afraid, we dug into the medical research to understand
the disease that threatened his future. We healed through
optimism, roused by the news eight days after his diagnosis that
the gene that causes CF had been found, opening the door toward a
cure. We knew that our heroes, the researchers and his doctors,
would continue to find ways to protect his future. We were no
longer afraid of CF.
The fear that woke me in the night was of losing our health
insurance because our son was on every insurer’s no-fly list.
While my husband’s profession was periodically roiled by layoffs,
he decided against the security of opening his own firm because
the cost of carrying coverage for our eldest son was too high,
the thread on which his health care dangled too slight.
With luck, we made it through our son’s childhood without a gap
in coverage. Now 22, he’s kept his health thanks to his medical
care and his own glorious determination not to allow CF to cramp
his style. He earned his black belt, went to college, joined a
fraternity, and drives a 1961 Buick LeSabre. He spent a year in
China, learned Mandarin, and discovered that even the drug that
enables CF patients to digest food couldn’t help him digest raw
sea cucumber. He backpacked through Thailand, had his wallet and
passport stolen, but managed to hang on to his meds. This spring
he will graduate with a degree in chemical engineering from UMass
Amherst’s honors college, with a concentration in biochemistry.
His resume includes summers researching the transmembrane
conductance regulator, the protein channel in our cells that,
when malformed, causes cystic fibrosis.
We can’t wait to see what this kid is going to do next. Next,
however, has filled me with that old middle-of-the night fear.
Our son will age off our family policy in April. He must shape
his future not according to his dreams and ability, but in ways
that will ensure that he keeps his health insurance. He must find
an employer with health benefits that will hire a new college
graduate in a poor economy. Or he must extend his full-time
student status until he’s 25, putting off career plans and his
desire to support himself. Despite his wanderlust and world-wide
opportunities, he must remain a resident of Massachusetts, an
isolated island where CF patients are not pariahs to health
insurance companies.
I tell our story not because it is unique. Other families have
been harmed, rather than merely threatened, by the ruthlessness
of American health insurance. I tell it to ask a question. It is
for you, the person reading this who does not wish the current
effort to reform health care to succeed, who calls it “Obamacare”
and “socialized medicine”. Help me understand your position,
because I am mystified.
Are you a parent? Do you know that the bill under debate will
prevent insurers from dumping people with pre-existing
conditions, like my son or, perhaps, someone in your family? Do
you believe that anyone who needs health care can get it somehow,
or that illness happens only to other families?
Are you a fiscal conservative concerned about cost? Do you
realize that the current system discourages small business
development and blocks young adults’ opportunities to succeed,
the foundations of a growing economy? Do you believe access to
health care is not as essential as access to education in
preparing our next generation of skilled workers?
Are you are an insurance executive? Do you devise new ways to
make it difficult for my son to obtain prescriptions and services
as cost-saving measures? Would you prefer to cover the cost of
his lung transplant, because he has not been able to get the
treatments he needs to stay healthy? Or have you decided that the
ultimate cost-saving measure is to let CF patients and other
chronic burdens to your bottom line die young?
Help me understand why, rather than reforming the American health
insurance system, we should turn our backs on my son and the
promise he and other young Americans like him offer all of us.
Patrick | 1.15.10 @ 11:23AM
Let's also remember that Massachusetts is home to a number of companies that produce medical equipment - these same companies will be heavily taxed under Obamacare and a lot of jobs may therefore be lost in the state. How's that for irony?
Tim| 1.15.10 @ 12:21PM
Apparently what they teach you at Harvard is that the best way to make medical care more affordable is to tax all of the constituent pieces more. Much more.
CF Mother| 1.15.10 @ 3:36PM
Questions for those who do not support health care reform:
Twenty years ago our cheery toddler was diagnosed with cystic fibrosis. Afraid, we dug into the medical research to understand the disease that threatened his future. We healed through optimism, roused by the news eight days after his diagnosis that the gene that causes CF had been found, opening the door toward a cure. We knew that our heroes, the researchers and his doctors, would continue to find ways to protect his future. We were no longer afraid of CF.
The fear that woke me in the night was of losing our health insurance because our son was on every insurer’s no-fly list. While my husband’s profession was periodically roiled by layoffs, he decided against the security of opening his own firm because the cost of carrying coverage for our eldest son was too high, the thread on which his health care dangled too slight.
With luck, we made it through our son’s childhood without a gap in coverage. Now 22, he’s kept his health thanks to his medical care and his own glorious determination not to allow CF to cramp his style. He earned his black belt, went to college, joined a fraternity, and drives a 1961 Buick LeSabre. He spent a year in China, learned Mandarin, and discovered that even the drug that enables CF patients to digest food couldn’t help him digest raw sea cucumber. He backpacked through Thailand, had his wallet and passport stolen, but managed to hang on to his meds. This spring he will graduate with a degree in chemical engineering from UMass Amherst’s honors college, with a concentration in biochemistry. His resume includes summers researching the transmembrane conductance regulator, the protein channel in our cells that, when malformed, causes cystic fibrosis.
We can’t wait to see what this kid is going to do next. Next, however, has filled me with that old middle-of-the night fear. Our son will age off our family policy in April. He must shape his future not according to his dreams and ability, but in ways that will ensure that he keeps his health insurance. He must find an employer with health benefits that will hire a new college graduate in a poor economy. Or he must extend his full-time student status until he’s 25, putting off career plans and his desire to support himself. Despite his wanderlust and world-wide opportunities, he must remain a resident of Massachusetts, an isolated island where CF patients are not pariahs to health insurance companies.
I tell our story not because it is unique. Other families have been harmed, rather than merely threatened, by the ruthlessness of American health insurance. I tell it to ask a question. It is for you, the person reading this who does not wish the current effort to reform health care to succeed, who calls it “Obamacare” and “socialized medicine”. Help me understand your position, because I am mystified.
Are you a parent? Do you know that the bill under debate will prevent insurers from dumping people with pre-existing conditions, like my son or, perhaps, someone in your family? Do you believe that anyone who needs health care can get it somehow, or that illness happens only to other families?
Are you a fiscal conservative concerned about cost? Do you realize that the current system discourages small business development and blocks young adults’ opportunities to succeed, the foundations of a growing economy? Do you believe access to health care is not as essential as access to education in preparing our next generation of skilled workers?
Are you are an insurance executive? Do you devise new ways to make it difficult for my son to obtain prescriptions and services as cost-saving measures? Would you prefer to cover the cost of his lung transplant, because he has not been able to get the treatments he needs to stay healthy? Or have you decided that the ultimate cost-saving measure is to let CF patients and other chronic burdens to your bottom line die young?
Help me understand why, rather than reforming the American health insurance system, we should turn our backs on my son and the promise he and other young Americans like him offer all of us.