The American Spectator

Ran / Si Vis Pacem| 1.12.10 @ 6:46AM

Stacy,
Nicely said, got me gloves on, pal...

Look, it's not "centrist" or "moderate" policies Brown holds. It's "muddled" policy. He's into Tyranny Lite™.

Your final point about Brown, (c) is valid too, but beware the stale date.

Kathleen| 1.12.10 @ 6:57AM

@Ran, I volunteered on Ron Paul's campaign for months, and voted for him in the General. I consider myself more "classically Republican" than Scott Brown and certainly more Republican than John McCain. But in light of Scott Brown's ability to kill Obamacare before it kills people like my elderly parents, I'm willing to vote for him. Purity tests and discriminatory ballot access laws (written by Democrats and Republicans) have all but guaranteed a Libertarian cannot be elected to national office. So I'm taking a page from the socialists' playbook--I'm voting for creeping libertarianism in the same way the statists have voted for creeping socialism. Given that the deck is fundamentally stacked against third parties, I'm forced to support a strategy of incrementalism. That's how we got where we are today. In this race, at least, I'm not willing to cut off my nose to spite my face. The stakes are too high.

dana| 1.12.10 @ 7:32AM

Below is ur comment--> this is how will WILL have to do things to save our great country.

So I'm taking a page from the socialists' playbook--I'm voting for creeping libertarianism in the same way the statists have voted for creeping socialism. Given that the deck is fundamentally stacked against third parties, I'm forced to support a strategy of incrementalism. That's how we got where we are today. In this race, at least, I'm not willing to cut off my nose to spite my face. The stakes are too high.

Ran / Si Vis Pacem| 1.12.10 @ 7:53AM

Kathleen,
Hey, I'm with you. Speaking of "discriminatory ballot access laws" - just wait until this Administration starts the effort to provide "justice" to illegals in the strategy that they'll swing the next election.

alin| 1.12.10 @ 7:05AM

But in light of Scott Brown's ability to kill Obamacare before it kills people like my elderly parents, I'm willing to vote for him. Purity tests and all star shoesdiscriminatory ballot access laws (written by Democrats and Republicans) have all but guaranteed
nike outleta Libertarian cannot be elected to national office.

ggoblue| 1.12.10 @ 7:22AM

what matters is that he is miles to the right of his opponent and he would vote to save us from communism.

Alan Brooks| 1.12.10 @ 8:01AM

" it is one thing to point out Palin's specific faults, errors and weaknesses. All politicians make mistakes "

Nothing wrong with Palin, except that men control women too much; in fact as long as men are men they will use violence to do so.
You think I'm progressive? if only that were so; but social (political) progress is finished for now.

JP| 1.12.10 @ 8:47AM

Here's my problem with Palin:

1)She should have remained at home with her infant children instead of accepting a national position that most certainly invaded her family's privacy. If conservative/traditional types have no problem with her doing that, then they are not quite as conservative as they think they are. Maggie Thatcher's children were out of the house when she ran for PM.

2)If extorting money from energy companies and redistributing that money is conservative economics the GOP is doomed. This is what Palin did in Alaska.

3)Palin in 2010 is like JFK in 1960 -not ready for Prime Time. The difference is, Palin doesn't have Joe Kennedy as a father ,RFK as a brother, and a fawning press corps. There is more to being President than giving a great stump speech (Obama is finding this out).

4)Palin stands out so well because on the national level the GOP is so weak. Palin is willing to take political risks to differentiate herself from the current pack of weaklings (Romney, the Huckster, Pawlenty, Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich). Let's face it, Palin is more manly then the men.

I will say this in her favor. She does show a remarkable ability to withstand some of the most vile gossip. I can't even remember Reagan getting hit so hard from so many directions. The filth thrown on Palin was without precedent (adultery, incest, etc...). The fact that she is till out there amongst the gutter snipes is quite remarkable. However, as a mother of small children, her first duty is to her family and not her ambitions.

Palin will run as an independent and split the conservative-libertarian-evangelical vote. Obama will win in 2012 with less than 40% of the electorate if that occurs.

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 9:04AM

Let's see, we now find out Palin didn't know that North and South Korea were two different countries, didn't know why we fought WWI and WWII, and didn't know the basic functions of the Fed. This is what happens when you don't read newspapers and don't study history. The only reason most of you like her is her social conservatism. That's what we need, a religious fanatic in the White House....

I support Brown as a fiscal conservative because huge programs like the health care bill will not solve our country's problems. And yes, RSM, I am a proud RINO -- i.e., fiscal conservative and social libertarian/atheist. And I cannot support idiots like Palin even if I might agree with her on some issues.

JP| 1.12.10 @ 9:39AM

Bob,
I wouldn't quite call her a religious fanatic. And I seriously doubt that she didn't know about both World Wars. Those accusations are just hyperbole. I'm not a Palin fan, but I won't go out trash her. If you really listen to her, she's fairly mainstream, but she uses boilerplate rhetoric in order to a)seperate herself from the pack and b)attract the grassroots conservatives that any national GOP politician needs to have. From what I read about her performance as govenor, she is fairly mainstream, but not exactly conservative.

Brown, on the other hand, comes from a very liberal state. It would certainly be foolish to expect him to run as a social conservative. However, I think most people have no problem supporting him. He comes off as an economic libertarian which is far more than we should hope for. Yesterday he received over $1 million via the internet, which indicates many Republicans outside of Mass. are attracted to his policies.

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 9:49AM

JP, she knew that WWI and WWII existed, but she didn't know who fought on either side and how they started. We know that now from Steve Schmidt directly during her debate prep. So those accusations are NOT hyperbole. This information just came out and was confirmed by her campaign staff.

Alan Brooks| 1.12.10 @ 10:33AM

"Obama will win in 2012 with less than 40% of the electorate if that occurs."

Obama will win no matter what.
a BLACK INCUMBENT can't be re-elected?-- could anyone really think that?

Ken (Old Texican)| 1.12.10 @ 10:30AM

JP,
I can sympathize with your thoughts that maybe Sarah should spend more time at home.

Conversely, many many moms go to work each day outside their homes. So did a zillion farm wives in centuries past...out in the garden...but with an extended family and good dad for support structure.
Sarah is fortunate to have that kind of family.

Extorting oil companies? NO! Texas does much the same thing, only here, those "separation fees" go to our State treasury and are utilized for State infrastructure and education.

Sarah just went one step further and returned those fees right back to Alaska's citizens.

I truly think Sarah's "ambitions" are for her country in which her family will live.

I may be wrong, but the only way I can see Sarah running (and loosing) as a third party candidate is to rebuke Republicans in congress...if in fact they can take it back...and go squishy and let the communists (pardon the shorthand), continue to run circles around we the people.

Sarah| 1.12.10 @ 11:36AM

Why, oh why is it always the WOMAN who is dinged about the children in the house? Obama has children that are young. Yet he isn't told that he should have kept them out of the political limelight. Okay for the men, but never, EVER okay for the women. I call horse pockey on that.

While I agree with some of your assessments, on this one, you are DEAD WRONG.

lia| 1.12.10 @ 7:42PM

That's right, OB has a wife who could support him and he could set a good social example by staying home and raising the kids. But then what would gramma do?

rspock| 1.12.10 @ 1:00PM

JP's points are all Dem propaganda talking points. I suggest he/she is actually a troll.

Margie| 1.13.10 @ 12:15AM

JP is a liar. And he knows it. Sarah Palin did not extort money from the Oil Industry.
If he had a conscience he wouldn't be a liar. He plays a high and mighty Catholic and enjoys berating those who are not as well.
Now he just proved what a hateful liar he is.

Alan Brooks| 1.12.10 @ 8:06AM

... look, no reason you would want to trust me.
But listen to the Derb, you can trust him--
the Derb knows best.

And if you think the Derb is too pessimistic (which he isn't) then there's George F. Will.

wbfrank| 1.12.10 @ 8:37AM

I know it will never happen because of the huge cut in salary, but:

Rush Limbaugh for president or maybe sec of state
Sean Hannity for vice-prez

one wonders... it might even be a vast improvement...

wfb

Alan Brooks| 1.12.10 @ 10:37AM

Nosir
Derb for POTUS (if we could change the law on foreign-born-- to Hell with birthers, worth it in Derb's case).
George F. Will for veep.

Now there's the ticket.

rssg| 1.12.10 @ 9:15AM

I still believe Palin will dump Barry Soetoro in three years. Why? Because Palin in 100% an American patriot instead of an "intellectual" who obfuscated his background and his real ambivalence about our country.

Palin deeply wants the US to be number one in the important areas - Barry is purposefully trying to bring our country down a step or two, in order be more liked by foreigners, who naturally want the US to be downgraded, to make themselves feel better and to laugh at us.

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 9:27AM

Do "patriots" quit their jobs when they get too tough? Do "patriots" think that North and South Korea are one country? Do "patriots" not know any of the cases decided by the Supreme Court? If you want everyone to laugh at us, just support Palin...

rssg| 1.12.10 @ 11:05AM

Bob, your boy is the White House did the following:

- Purposefully obfuscated his background, to cover up numerous associations (family and friends) who are stridently anti-American, communist, anarchist, etc.

- Has ZERO business experience.
- Has ZERO military experience.
- Led a pampered life, going to expensive private schools and exhibits real elitism everytime he speaks.

That's why the public has turned on him so quickly. This chimp is a one term wonder.

rssg| 1.12.10 @ 11:14AM

Bob - I don't need nor want an "intellectual" in the White House. Much prefer someone who actually has worked in her (his) life. Someone with a real middle class life.

I don't look to idolize politicians; I want them to SHRINK the state, lessen regulations, lower immigration, keep a strong national defense and let people keep their money and do what they please. Politicians are whores and I don't give my money to whores. Leave me alone is what I say to politicians, which is the best American tradition.

freeta goodholm| 1.12.10 @ 10:54PM

Already laughing at you.

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 9:30AM

And we now also have confirmation that Palin is a liar. She told her campaign to lie about Todd's registration with the Alaska Independent Party. This has been confirmed from several sources directly and is not hearsay. But I guess as long as she is a social conservative, lying is just fine....

Alan Brooks| 1.12.10 @ 10:15AM

You cannot be in politics without lying.
Sarah isn't a nun.

Alan Brooks| 1.12.10 @ 10:28AM

In the secular world there are no genuine ethics.
Palin is no worse than any other politician, Bob.
Her main flaw is her glasses make her look like a skoolmarm-- she is very attractive otherwise. Now that she is wealthy, can't she arrange for lasik?

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 10:35AM

Of course there are "ethics" in a secular world. The main reason for secular ethics is that if you are caught doing something wrong, you've ruined your future. This is also true in the religious world. How many Christian leaders have lied about their sexual activities? Lying is both secular and human.

Alan Brooks| 1.12.10 @ 10:41AM

NO ethics in secular politics-- not sincere ethics.

You mean rules, not ethics, Bob. All we have are situational ethics, which are merely
loose rules dandied up as ethics.

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 10:31AM

Actually, politicians learn to "shade" the truth, not to pursue outright lies. The fact that Palin does not have a moral problem with outright lies is a huge issue. Another technique is to promise something they probably cannot deliver. All politicians do that. But it has now been shown that Sarah had a real problem with the truth. In other words, should would say anything to get elected -- anything. I cannot believe sentient beings would still support her...

Alan Brooks| 1.12.10 @ 10:44AM

It is a woman's prerogative to lie, Bob.

Wait until you get to Heaven, then you can know truth. On earth you are free-falling in nihilism.

Siegfried X| 1.12.10 @ 9:39AM

If we could count on Brown voting against health care and other liberal programs, it would mean that he's not a RINO. On the other hand if Brown is elected with conservative support, then gives Obama the 60th vote for health care, that would show why a lot of conservatives have walked away from the Republican Party. A politician who votes like a Democrat is a Democrat, aka a RINO.

After all John McCain did exactly that, give Democrats the vote they needed to pass liberal legislation. He did it again and again and again and yet somehow became the Republican candidate for president.

Alan Brooks| 1.12.10 @ 10:21AM

You guys take politics too seriously.
it's mainly about probing for weakness, and then exploiting weakness. Our substrate is a modern jungle; our politics are jungle-politics .

Don't like it? go to church-- that's the only sanctuary you'll know in the near future? decades from now? can't look that far ahead.

Alan Brooks| 1.12.10 @ 10:24AM

pardon,
the only sanctuary you'll find is at a house of worship, in the near future. That wasn't meant to be a question.

BTW, you can't say 'church' much, that's not PC in the outside world. You have to say "house of worship."

china racking| 1.12.10 @ 10:31AM

good article

Ken (OLd Texican)| 1.12.10 @ 10:35AM

I just can't help but chuckle about Alan writing "paired comments" one after another.

Alan,
are you just forgetful? Do you have a bifurcated mind sorta' schizophrenic?
Are your good angel and your bad angel battling it out?
Just curious. heh.

Alan Brooks| 1.12.10 @ 10:50AM

"Are your good angel and your bad angel battling it out?"

YES!
And it takes one to know one. Which church do YOU go to, Ken?

Janice| 1.12.10 @ 3:20PM

Lately, Alan's bad angel has been winning most of the battles.

Alan Brooks| 1.12.10 @ 10:48AM

I'm as schizophrenic as Texas politics.
I KNOW what it is like in Texas, Ken.

The state that produced LBJ, the Bushes.

rt| 1.12.10 @ 11:28AM

bob you are a raving diot and a religious bigot!

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 11:39AM

Yeah, I'm the kind of idiot who believes in facts, data, analysis, and the truth. As for being a religious "bigot", if you want to believe in some mystical creature in the sky, that is your right -- just don't force your beliefs on me. I believe in individual liberty, so if two women want to marry, that is their business. If a women wants an abortion, that is her business. In addition, I want the government out of our lives as much as possible. Understand that you, wanting to force your beliefs on me, are the bigot in this discussion.

Ran| 1.12.10 @ 12:38PM

Hey RT,

Bob... Ought to be more careful with his lies about Palin. His mischaracterization of her as a "religious fanatic", for example, is dishonest because not only is she understated in her personal religious expression, but because she is outspoken in her tolerance and support for the faiths of others. Bob knows this, yet so do we.

He knows full well that his comrades in Alaska were bankrupting the Palins - personally bankrupting them - with many proven false allegations of corruption. He's not, apparently, clued-in that we, too, know it.

Bob has quite the history around here as a proven and admonished liar. Check the links, scroll down.

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 12:58PM

Please, everyone, check out the links. Hillyer is the most bigoted person on this site and his name calling is legend. He asked that I not respond on his postings, and I have complied (except for once when I actually agreed with him).

The liar here is Ran -- and he knows it. Too bad he has nothing of value to add to the discussion...

I would also ask you all to look at the facts about Palin OBJECTIVELY, and you will come to some of the same conclusions as me, and most of the KNOWLEDGEABLE people.

freeya goodholm| 1.12.10 @ 10:58PM

OK OK !
You are an idiot!

zing!| 1.13.10 @ 12:01AM

Notice how "Bob" answered rt as Alan Brooks!

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 12:24PM

Here's another way of looking at your bigotry. I would vote for a SMART, religious person like a Romney or Jindal as their fiscally conservative views are closer to mine. But you would never vote for an atheist, would you? Yes, you are the bigot here...

Osbourne Cox| 1.12.10 @ 11:58AM

good post, Other Mac.
"The label "RINO" (Republican In Name Only) functions appropriately as an epithet when it is reserved for those Republicans who either (a) provide crucial votes for liberal policies in key legislative battles, such as the eight House Republicans who voted for the Waxman-Markey energy tax bill;"

That is the key. If Brown wins but fails to vote to kill Obamacare or any slightly re-touched version thereof, will be be pilloried as a RINO in the Specter/McCain/Grahamnesty mode.

Osbourne Cox| 1.12.10 @ 12:00PM

btw, ignore comments by Bob. He is either the blog's assigned Axeltroll, or he is Phil Klein's nom de plume. Same result in either case.

Ran| 1.12.10 @ 12:50PM

Ozzie, check the links above. Bob has quite the unsavory history around here. His own words, not second-hand ad-hominem that he so much loves. We're taught there's no schadenfreude when a troll's own words bury them... Yeah, I dunno.

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 1:00PM

Personal attacks rather than arguing on the merits. I see you learned a great deal from the study of the Talmud...

Pete2| 1.12.10 @ 1:19PM

This BS concerning Palin is getting ridiculous. She has her good points and bad points like anyone else. She also has intellect, which is sorely missing among many liberals and quite a few "republicans". Don't you people understand that she actually a uniting force on the right, a focal point? She probably won't win any elections nationally but she sure damn well will direct the troops in the battle to victory. The biggest obstacle we have to overcome is the intellectually snobbish posters on the "right" who believe that a woman is not only incapable of intelligent thought but should stay out of politics completely. We're going to win in spite of your intereference. So go back to your useless postings.

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 1:27PM

Perhaps you have examples of her "intellect". She couldn't even write her own book! Perhaps it is her knowledge of Supreme Court decisions or the function of the fed. Perhaps you can show me a treatise on some subject matter including original through the a good bibliography. Maybe you can show me how well she did in school not withstanding her admitted "D" in economics. Please, show me her intellect...

SoCon| 1.12.10 @ 3:16PM

You used to try to shade your Axelrod trolldom (though, we were never fooled), now you just flaunt it.

Why should we believe Bob-- a bigoted atheist, a proven liar and a dirt bag who voted for the man who advocates infanticide? Clown.

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 3:30PM

SoCon, I've never lied, and the links prove that. But then again, you religious fanatics call everyone who doesn't agree with you, liars. As for bigotry, I've always said I'd vote for smart, religious fiscal conservatives like Jindal and Romney. You would never vote for an atheist. So who is the real bigot here?????

SoCon| 1.12.10 @ 3:51PM

Bob, what's Quin got to do with YOUR lies?

Quin Hillyer banned you from his postings because he got sick of your constant lies and vicious personal attacks (You're the only blogger he's EVER banned).

Later, you were caught sneaking comments on his postings after you'd promised you wouldn't. Embarrassing.

REPEATEDLY, you've been caught in bald-faced lies by several bloggers: Notably, Ran and Nick from Detroit.

In short, you're an Axelrod troll pretending to be a RINO--and you are a particularly unpleasant troll at that.

Absolutely nothing recommends you.

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 3:59PM

Again, SoCon, you continue YOUR bigotry and lies. I attacked Hillyer because of his constant name calling and race baiting. He has a very thin skin, obviously. And I didn't "sneak" comments on his blog as there was one time where I agreed with him and said so -- and that was the ONLY time. I didn't use any other names -- but please don't let facts get in your way. As for other "lies", what were they? The fact that I remembered being taught that some of the bible was written in biblical Aramaic? Whoopy do! The fact that I misstated the 3/5th clause of the Constitution? Whoopy do! Those are lies?

No wonder you think so much of Palin, you have no critical thinking ability of your own...

Again, YOU are the real bigot here because you could not vote for an atheist. Right????

SoCon| 1.12.10 @ 4:37PM

Bob, YOU are the only blogger Quin has banned. You were caught sneaking comments onto his posts after you'd promised not to--I'm the one who caught you.

Even the AmSpec writers know you're a liar and an inflammatory tool.

Your word means nothing.

SoCon| 1.12.10 @ 3:56PM

Bob, Your blind hatred toward people of faith is disconcerting; case in point--Sarah Palin.

You're one of the nastiest bigots I've ever had the extreme displeasure to meet. You do stand out, Bob--in a BAD way.

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 4:02PM

No hatred, SoCon. You can believe any fairy tale you want. And you obviously have not been listening. Jindal is a devout Catholic and I support him strongly. Obama is a Christian, and I support him. I'm just against religion intruding into politics. What if Sarah was an atheist or a Muslim and the same in every other way -- would you really support her???? Yes, SoCon, you are the bigot here.

SoCon| 1.12.10 @ 4:41PM

You're the only one who says so--and your word means jack. On the other hand; numerous AmSpec posters have excoriated you for your lies and bigotry toward believers--including Quin Hillyer. Ugly little man.

JP| 1.12.10 @ 3:30PM

I see your points Pete. But you're making the same arguments that were made for Bush43. The GOP went head long in its support for Bush in 1999-2000 ignoring some rather obvious flaws he had as govenor.

As I posted earlier, support for Palin is strong in many circles because the national GOP is so weak. I mean the cupboard is bare.

Bob| 1.12.10 @ 4:06PM

One of the reasons the cupboard is bare is the litmus tests of the religious right. Case in point was Tom Ridge. I would have voted for him over Obama in a heartbeat. The same is true for Colin Powell.

SoCon| 1.12.10 @ 4:43PM

Who gives a rat's rear end who you'd vote for--you voted for Obama; nothing else needs to be said. You have no credibility, troll.

Ran| 1.12.10 @ 9:28PM

"SoCon, I've never lied, and the links prove that." But they do NOT, thus, the lies are perpetuated.

The insurmountable problem for Bob is that the Five Books were never, ever in Aramaic. Parts of the Torah sh'baal peh - the later commentaries - yes, but not even *one* phrase of the Five Books that Bob specifically mentioned are in Aramaic... in other words, he LIED. Totally, irretrievably lied. A really stupid lie, too... so easily exposed.

It would be EXACTLY like claiming that, at the age of 10, he had translated the Iliad from the original "Latin" or Shakespeare's sonnets from the original "French."

SoCon, high-five.

SoCon| 1.12.10 @ 10:10PM

Thanks, Ran; you're one of my faves. I admire both your intelligence and integrity. I wish there were more like you on this earth. :)

I am so tired of mean-spirited trolls. Just what exactly did Sarah Palin do to elicit such flat-out hatred? It frightens me.

Don't get any ideas, Bob--you DON'T scare me.

Sapwolf| 1.13.10 @ 12:02AM

I'm a Palinista, maybe the biggest in Ohio.

I sent $50 to Brown's campaign.

There is no way I would do that if he were running as say for the House in District 2 Ohio. Jean Schmidt would still get my money.

We are talking about MA here.

Collectively, if we put Brown in the Senate from MA, instead of Coakley, we in effect move slightly the average Conservative rating of the Senate more to the right.

And, he may vote against Obamacare therefore forcing the Dems to try to pass it with reconciliation or some other dirty trick such as not swearing Brown in. Again, that would piss off people in his state further.

It's a team effort people. Can anybody see Brown voting against a Supreme Court nominee of say...President Palin? Maybe.

But we damn well know Coakley would be Reid's bit*h in the Senate just like Gillibrand is the bit*h of Schumer. She'd vote against any picks by a GOP POTUS.

Sapwolf| 1.13.10 @ 12:15AM

Bob,

What the hell is your problem?

One lie after another. Get some help.

RSM is pretty generous letting your poison hang around here.

Sapwolf| 1.13.10 @ 12:16AM

Anybody monitor trolls here at AS?

Guess not.

SoCon| 1.13.10 @ 2:18AM

Hi, Sapwolf. I read your comments on Hot Air (great blog! Michele's great). I lurk there a lot and enjoy the interaction among you folks (except the trolls).

What's with Hornet Sting? Girl's got a temper!

I'd like to register and join in on the fun, but I've chickened out so far.

Any advice?

Sapwolf| 1.14.10 @ 5:41PM

My advice is make sure you have the time. Blogging chews up time.

My big hobby now is joining or starting a Tea Party group in northeast Cincinnati. Once that venture takes off, it will suck most of my time outside of work.

Raymond| 1.14.10 @ 1:31PM

Bob,
You are underestimating the power of a woman. We are both men, but most of the time, we men can easily be corrupted by single piece between the legs of a woman. We men cannot accept defeat because of pride on our heads. Woman, on the other hand, can be stronger than men in terms of moral principles. I have PhD in Human Behavior that is why I know the strong points and weaknesses of both species. A lot of strong women became world's great leaders: Thatcher, Queen Elizabeth, Joan of Arc, Queen Esther of Persia, Golda Meir of Israel, President Cory Aquino of Phils. Golda Meir, a woman, was highly acknowledge in the world for Israeli victories during the Six days War with arabs governed by macho man arab leaders. Cory of Phils was able to topple a Philippine dictator from his 20 year rule. Perhaps, Sarah Palin, if elected first woman POTUS can be able to make a difference. Remember this: effective leadership is not measured by being an intellectual; rather by being proactive with great common sense. Leader must have great common sense visions

Raymond| 1.14.10 @ 1:39PM

By the way, Bob, further to my comment, the difference between Obama, Romney, Huckabee and Palin is this: Obama, Huck and Mitt are reactive leaders. Sarah Palin, like Reagan, is a proactive leader. Sarah Palin has visions and can anticipate good and bad things in the future. Obama and Mitt Romney lack this kind of quality as a leader. Sarah Palin has high common sense skills and that is why she was able to govern Alaska with effectiveness. Learn from me: I was there in Alaska for the past 10 years, and I knew the reality there.

pricila| 4.24.10 @ 9:52AM

personally bankrupting them - with many proven false allegations of corruption. He's not, apparently, clued-in that we, too, know it. top online fax