The United States unemployment rate remained unchanged at 10
percent in December, but the economy lost an additional 85,000
jobs, the Department of Labor reported
this morning. The numbers were worse than expected, because many
economists had anticipated job growth during the month.
In addition, the labor force participation rate dropped to 64.6
percent in December from 64.9 percent in November, bringing it to
the lowest level of the year. Some see this as a more accurate
measure of the employment situation because it takes into account
those who have given up looking for work because the job market
was to weak, a segment of the population that is eliminated when
calculating the headline unemployment number. There were 929,000
discouraged workers in December who gave up looking for work
because they didn't think jobs were available.
Taking everything into account -- including the fact that some
workers who are employed part-time would prefer to be working
full-time -- the unemployment rate is 17.3 percent.
In one of the few batches of good news, the report said that the
economy did add a modest 4,000 jobs in November, which
represented an upward revision from the original estimate that
11,000 were lost during the month. However, the report also
upwardly revised job losses in October to 127,000 from the prior
estimate of 111,000.
From a political perspective, the report is more bad news for the
Obama administration, which had hoped to be able to tout some
growth in jobs during the month. The economy is averaging fewer
job losses now than it was a year ago, but the labor market is
still quite weak.
Interesting way that they run the job numbers. They made an error
and ran the numbers to 10.2%, probably in an attempt to make it
seem as though the economy is improving when they announce that
the number dropped to 10%. The likely truth is that the 10.2% was
about .5% higher than reality, and they were hoping to be able to
drop it in the future significantly, but unemployment kept
rising.
It would be interesting to see the minutes of the meeting where
they work to determine the actual unemployment numbers.
Well, lets make it look better this month than it really is,
revise it next month to slightly closer to reality, then in the
last month we can finally be honest about 2 month old data. So
what we get is best possible press for current fake numbers, and
no real coverage of how bad it has really been.
Michael| 1.12.10 @ 12:49AM
Get ready, 11% unemployment is just around the corner :(
High quality Cisco, HP, IBM, Oracle and other Certification exmas
training materials are provided here at Pass4sure. Pass4sure
helps you on your way to your certifications
astonerii| 1.8.10 @ 12:19PM
Interesting way that they run the job numbers. They made an error and ran the numbers to 10.2%, probably in an attempt to make it seem as though the economy is improving when they announce that the number dropped to 10%. The likely truth is that the 10.2% was about .5% higher than reality, and they were hoping to be able to drop it in the future significantly, but unemployment kept rising.
It would be interesting to see the minutes of the meeting where they work to determine the actual unemployment numbers.
Well, lets make it look better this month than it really is, revise it next month to slightly closer to reality, then in the last month we can finally be honest about 2 month old data. So what we get is best possible press for current fake numbers, and no real coverage of how bad it has really been.
Michael| 1.12.10 @ 12:49AM
Get ready, 11% unemployment is just around the corner :(
http://www.businessinsider.com.....ary-2010-1
350-030| 4.19.10 @ 6:25AM
High quality Cisco, HP, IBM, Oracle and other Certification exmas training materials are provided here at Pass4sure. Pass4sure helps you on your way to your certifications
640-553| 4.19.10 @ 6:25AM
thanks share