The federal government said Wednesday that it will take
majority control of troubled auto lender GMAC and provide an
additional $3.8 billion in aid to the company, which has been
unable to raise from private investors the money it needs to
staunch its losses.
The Treasury Department has said for months that GMAC would
need more federal money, but the decision to increase the
government's ownership stake came as a surprise, cutting
against the grain of the Obama administration's recent efforts
to wind down its bailout of large banks.
What initially appeared to be a closing act now looks more like
year-end portfolio rebalancing, with companies including
Citigroup and
Bank of America allowed to repay aid even as the government
deepens its involvement in mortgage financiers Fannie
Mae and Freddie
Mac -- and now, GMAC.
The government now owns majority ownership stakes in those
three firms,
General Motors and insurance giant
American International Group. It also holds large stakes in
Citigroup and Chrysler.
The additional aid for GMAC underscores both its struggles and
its importance to the administration's efforts to revive the
auto industry. GMAC, which already has taken $12.5 billion in
direct federal aid along with other forms of government
support, is the largest lender to General Motors and Chrysler
dealerships and to their customers.
Well, with a $12 trillion national debt, at least $10
trillion more red ink expected over the next decade,
and $107 trillion in unfunded liabilities for Social Security and
Medicare--as well as who knows how many trillions more in debt if
health care "reform" passes--what's another $3.8 billion among
friends?
It seems the only thing Washington isn't willing to spend money
on is controlling the border and deporting illegal immigrants.
dum & dummer| 1.1.10 @ 3:39PM
sean, can't be deporting all those folks that acorn will find a
way to register and get to the polls, now can we?
Bob| 1.1.10 @ 6:59PM
This isn't just an Obama thing... Remember that prior to Obama,
Reagan and Bush2 had, by far, the largest increases in national
debt. All of them should be hung by their gonads for their
actions.
If Washington cannot hold spending down, then the only real
"conservative" thing to do is increase taxes.
Bert Gold| 1.2.10 @ 12:00PM
My friend Michael Phillips, a Republican but the founder of
MasterCard, has powerfully argued for letting GM etc. go
bankrupt. His position is that if the marketplace won't support
it, why is it a government function to keep it going? Further, he
argues that the inefficiencies bred into the Corporation that
caused it to fail will never be cleaned if it is rescued. After
several weeks of arguing, I find myself agreeing with Michael.
The problem now is that Obama, Axelrod, and Emanuel don't seem to
be sophisticated enough about economics to understand their two
major challenges: To right the listing ship of the American
economy and to reform American healthcare (which is nearly a
fifth of that listing ship). Their main problem is that they
don't want pain for the upper class which contributes to their
campaign. Unfortunately, that's a strategy sure to lose the
electorate and their popular sympathy. So, I'm guessing that the
other party will occupy the White House and Congress in the short
term future.
Bob| 1.2.10 @ 12:55PM
Bert, perhaps you and your MasterCard friend aren't
"sophisticated" enough to grasp the GM situation. First of all,
GM did go bankrupt -- I know, I held preferred stock in the
company. Secondly, GM is the largest manufacturer in the U.S. The
loss of that manufacturing capacity would further degrade the
employment levels. In addition, there were thousands of small
businesses dependent on GM including suppliers, distributors,
and, of course, dealers. Arguing that the bankruptcy should have
occurred earlier is probably sound, but arguing that the
government should not have been involved shows a lack of
understanding of the economic impact of a full loss of the
company. Furthermore, that manufacturing capacity is necessary
for our national security to build machinery for our military.
On the other hand, you don't mention the bailout of Wall Street
firms -- and that is quite indicative of an elitist point of
view. The Wall Street companies should have gone bankrupt instead
of being bailed out as they do not produce products of material
value to our economy. Most of the money made on Wall Street was
due to the manipulation of the market with vehicles like
derivatives, swaps, and trading revenues. They should have been
held accountable for their decisions even if that meant a deeper
recession.
And your argument that a change will occur in the White House is
weak. We all know from history that people vote their pocketbook.
If the economy turns around, Obama and the Dems will stay since
Republicans do not offer a better alternative. Cutting taxes
without reducing spending (as with Reagan and Bush), is far worse
to our future than spending and taxing to cover that spending.
Mike M| 1.2.10 @ 6:42PM
Good! It wasn't until I seen a Dodge commercial during the Sugar
Bowl that I realized there are no Dodge commercials anymore. The
soon to be discontinued Chevy commercials will mean Obama will
save GM money. GM will be in the black before you know it!
Even more apparent that the socialists-in-charge are slipping
more of taxpayers' hard earned money under the carpet [or maybe
pulling it out of th freezer, if you're a Louisiana congressman
perhaps] than the government's funding [at labor unions's
request] of GMAC; is their eliminating the financial caps
previously put upon Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac at midnight
pre-Christmas. This will allow the federal government, going
forward, to completely provide AFFORDABLE HOMES [ie residential
WELFARE] to any/all housing loan applicants providing
governmental welfare documentation, food stamps, aid to dependent
children vouchers, etc as PROOF OF THEIR QUALIFYING INCOME. What
will be next-----an all-paid, month-long trip to Europe for these
welfare recipients [all at taxpayer expense of
course]?????????????
Sean| 1.1.10 @ 9:15AM
It seems the only thing Washington isn't willing to spend money on is controlling the border and deporting illegal immigrants.
dum & dummer| 1.1.10 @ 3:39PM
sean, can't be deporting all those folks that acorn will find a way to register and get to the polls, now can we?
Bob| 1.1.10 @ 6:59PM
This isn't just an Obama thing... Remember that prior to Obama, Reagan and Bush2 had, by far, the largest increases in national debt. All of them should be hung by their gonads for their actions.
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
If Washington cannot hold spending down, then the only real "conservative" thing to do is increase taxes.
Bert Gold| 1.2.10 @ 12:00PM
My friend Michael Phillips, a Republican but the founder of MasterCard, has powerfully argued for letting GM etc. go bankrupt. His position is that if the marketplace won't support it, why is it a government function to keep it going? Further, he argues that the inefficiencies bred into the Corporation that caused it to fail will never be cleaned if it is rescued. After several weeks of arguing, I find myself agreeing with Michael. The problem now is that Obama, Axelrod, and Emanuel don't seem to be sophisticated enough about economics to understand their two major challenges: To right the listing ship of the American economy and to reform American healthcare (which is nearly a fifth of that listing ship). Their main problem is that they don't want pain for the upper class which contributes to their campaign. Unfortunately, that's a strategy sure to lose the electorate and their popular sympathy. So, I'm guessing that the other party will occupy the White House and Congress in the short term future.
Bob| 1.2.10 @ 12:55PM
Bert, perhaps you and your MasterCard friend aren't "sophisticated" enough to grasp the GM situation. First of all, GM did go bankrupt -- I know, I held preferred stock in the company. Secondly, GM is the largest manufacturer in the U.S. The loss of that manufacturing capacity would further degrade the employment levels. In addition, there were thousands of small businesses dependent on GM including suppliers, distributors, and, of course, dealers. Arguing that the bankruptcy should have occurred earlier is probably sound, but arguing that the government should not have been involved shows a lack of understanding of the economic impact of a full loss of the company. Furthermore, that manufacturing capacity is necessary for our national security to build machinery for our military.
On the other hand, you don't mention the bailout of Wall Street firms -- and that is quite indicative of an elitist point of view. The Wall Street companies should have gone bankrupt instead of being bailed out as they do not produce products of material value to our economy. Most of the money made on Wall Street was due to the manipulation of the market with vehicles like derivatives, swaps, and trading revenues. They should have been held accountable for their decisions even if that meant a deeper recession.
And your argument that a change will occur in the White House is weak. We all know from history that people vote their pocketbook. If the economy turns around, Obama and the Dems will stay since Republicans do not offer a better alternative. Cutting taxes without reducing spending (as with Reagan and Bush), is far worse to our future than spending and taxing to cover that spending.
Mike M| 1.2.10 @ 6:42PM
Good! It wasn't until I seen a Dodge commercial during the Sugar Bowl that I realized there are no Dodge commercials anymore. The soon to be discontinued Chevy commercials will mean Obama will save GM money. GM will be in the black before you know it!
ghd| 1.3.10 @ 12:51PM
Welcome to our website: http://www.e8800.com
As the commodities we supply are of excellent quality and low price,E8800.com offer you the stylish GHD straighteners uk, include the
Farouk Chi Flat Iron,Chi Hair Straighteners,GHD Hair Straighteners.
we have won a very good reputation from our clients all over the world.
If you are interested in any of our products, please don't hesitate to contact with me by email.
i trust that through our cooperation we shall be able to conclude some transactions with you in the near future.
Website: http://www.bikinisguide.com
Oldefarte| 1.3.10 @ 4:08PM
Even more apparent that the socialists-in-charge are slipping more of taxpayers' hard earned money under the carpet [or maybe pulling it out of th freezer, if you're a Louisiana congressman perhaps] than the government's funding [at labor unions's request] of GMAC; is their eliminating the financial caps previously put upon Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac at midnight pre-Christmas. This will allow the federal government, going forward, to completely provide AFFORDABLE HOMES [ie residential WELFARE] to any/all housing loan applicants providing governmental welfare documentation, food stamps, aid to dependent children vouchers, etc as PROOF OF THEIR QUALIFYING INCOME. What will be next-----an all-paid, month-long trip to Europe for these welfare recipients [all at taxpayer expense of course]?????????????