The Senate voted after 1 a.m. Friday morning to limit debate on a
defense spending bill, in keeping with Majority Leader Harry
Reid's pace to hold a final health care vote on Christmas Eve.
The appropriations bill included must-pass funding to keep the
military running as well as other items such as an extension of
unemployment benefits and food stamps.
Democrats accused Republicans who were delaying a final vote on
the bill of playing politics with the troops.
"Senate Republican leadership has shamelessly turned this into a
purely partisan exercise," Reid said.
But Sen. Jon Kyl argued that Democrats run Congress, and they
could have passed a bill to fund the Department of Defense at any
time over the past several months.
Sen. Arlen Specter seemed to undercut the argument that the
Democratic concerns were all about the troops when he wrote on
Twitter, "In session tonight so that we can stay on track to pass
health care reform as soon as possible."
Earlier Thursday night, Democrats became concerned that
Republicans would successfully filibuster the spending bill and
delay the health care push, but
convened a meeting in which anti-war Democratic Sen. Russ
Feingold, who had intended to oppose the measure, agreed to give
his party the necessary votes. Ultimately, the motion passed 63
to 33.
Senate procedure requires 30 hours of debate after a cloture
vote, setting up a final vote on the defense bill at 7:30 a.m.
Saturday morning. Then Reid will have to file his "managers
amendment" -- essentially the final version of the health care
bill -- Saturday in order to be on track to pass legislation on
Christmas Eve.
The first big test is expected at 1 a.m. Monday, when the
Senate would vote on the final changes to the healthcare bill
that are packaged in a manager’s amendment. If Reid fails to
rally his entire conference for that vote, or offset any
defectors with an equal number of Republicans, the game is up
and Democrats go home without advancing President Barack
Obama’s top domestic priority.
Somebody mentioned Currently, a 60-year-old likely would pay five
or six times more for private medical insurance than someone in
his twenties but it may not be true always check
http://bit.ly/7bwEx2 for lower price coverages
rt| 12.18.09 @ 1:05PM
KBH the RINO from TX voted for cloture with the Maine sisters!
karenmarkel| 12.18.09 @ 4:01AM
Somebody mentioned Currently, a 60-year-old likely would pay five or six times more for private medical insurance than someone in his twenties but it may not be true always check http://bit.ly/7bwEx2 for lower price coverages
rt| 12.18.09 @ 1:05PM
KBH the RINO from TX voted for cloture with the Maine sisters!
racking| 1.5.10 @ 9:53AM
http://www.racking-shelving.com
http://www.cold-store-equipment.com