The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Rep. Raul Grijalva, co-chairman of the 80-member Congressional Progressive Caucus, on Tuesday blasted the government plan compromise taking shape in the Senate, saying the deal was "not even reminiscent of a public option."

Grijalva said that the White House and Senate Democrats have "have already compromised far too much. At some point in this process, the question became not what was the best policy for the American people, but what could be done to appease a recalcitrant handful who have negotiated in bad faith. We need strong leadership so close to the finish line, not efforts to water down a bill to the breaking point in a misguided attempt to win votes that were never there.”

The broad outlines of a deal would have the government body that oversees the health plan for federal employees create a number of plans administered by private non-profit companies, while also expanding Medicaid and lowering the Medicare elgibility age to 55. Grijalva said the proposal, "does not create enough private sector competition, which we desperately need to benefit working families.”

“We need a public option, period,” Grijalva concluded. “I cannot support a system that forces Americans to buy private insurance and then allows those companies to collect government subsidies without competition. Our final health care bill should be based on policy outcomes and the needs of consumers, and the direction the Senate is taking does not give me confidence.”

Although it's the least of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's concerns at the moment, Grijalva's views cannot be completely discounted, because any bill that emerges from the Senate must be reconciled with the House version and pass both chambers again.

View all comments (3) | Leave a comment

Eric Cartman| 12.8.09 @ 2:49PM

Who think this Grijalva guy is an illegal alien, raise your hands. Democrats wouldn't care, would they?

Jeff Perren| 12.9.09 @ 12:28PM

That there exists a "Progressive Caucus" in the first place is the basic problem. There should no more be Progressives in Congress than their should be 1920s-style Italian Fascists, whom they closely resemble, philosophically.

The political problems we face will not be resolved until it is as politically unviable to be a self-confessed Progressive as it was to be a self-confessed Communist in the 1950s.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/12/08/house-progressive-leader-slams

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT