Rep. Raul Grijalva, co-chairman of the 80-member Congressional
Progressive Caucus, on Tuesday
blasted the government plan compromise taking shape in the
Senate, saying the deal was "not even reminiscent of a public
option."
Grijalva said that the White House and Senate Democrats have
"have already compromised far too much. At some point in this
process, the question became not what was the best policy for the
American people, but what could be done to appease a recalcitrant
handful who have negotiated in bad faith. We need strong
leadership so close to the finish line, not efforts to water down
a bill to the breaking point in a misguided attempt to win votes
that were never there.”
The broad outlines of a deal would have the government body that
oversees the health plan for federal employees create a number of
plans administered by private non-profit companies, while also
expanding Medicaid and lowering the Medicare elgibility age to
55. Grijalva said the proposal, "does not create enough private
sector competition, which we desperately need to benefit working
families.”
“We need a public option, period,” Grijalva concluded. “I cannot
support a system that forces Americans to buy private insurance
and then allows those companies to collect government subsidies
without competition. Our final health care bill should be based
on policy outcomes and the needs of consumers, and the direction
the Senate is taking does not give me confidence.”
Although it's the least of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's
concerns at the moment, Grijalva's views cannot be completely
discounted, because any bill that emerges from the Senate must be
reconciled with the House version and pass both chambers again.
That there exists a "Progressive Caucus" in the first place is
the basic problem. There should no more be Progressives in
Congress than their should be 1920s-style Italian Fascists, whom
they closely resemble, philosophically.
The political problems we face will not be resolved until it is
as politically unviable to be a self-confessed Progressive as it
was to be a self-confessed Communist in the 1950s.
Pingback| 12.8.09 @ 1:27PM
Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : House Progressive Leade links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Eric Cartman| 12.8.09 @ 2:49PM
Who think this Grijalva guy is an illegal alien, raise your hands. Democrats wouldn't care, would they?
Jeff Perren| 12.9.09 @ 12:28PM
That there exists a "Progressive Caucus" in the first place is the basic problem. There should no more be Progressives in Congress than their should be 1920s-style Italian Fascists, whom they closely resemble, philosophically.
The political problems we face will not be resolved until it is as politically unviable to be a self-confessed Progressive as it was to be a self-confessed Communist in the 1950s.
racking| 1.7.10 @ 12:50AM
http://www.racking-shelving.com
http://www.cold-store-equipment.com