Ben Bernanke is sounding too conservative for the left.
John B. Judis at the New Republic
is afraid that Bernanke wants to destroy Medicare and Social
Security.
Echoing the charges of economic conservatives and Wall
Streeters like investment banker Peter Peterson, Bernanke took
aim against what these folks call “entitlements,” but which are
known popularly to be social security and
Medicare. Republicans can be expected to cite his comments
in the current debate over the Democratic health care reform
bill.
...
Why would someone seeking to be confirmed by a Democratic
majority go out of his way to promote starkly Republican
concerns?
The relevant words:
MR. BERNANKE: And on the spending side
again, you know, Willie Sutton robbed banks "because that's
where the money is," as he put it. The money in this case is in
entitlements. Those are the programs which are
growing. At the rate we're going in about 15 years the
entire federal budget will be entitlements and interest and
there won't be any money left over for defense or any of the
other activities. So clearly we're facing a very difficult
structural problem in that we have an aging society and rising
health care costs, and the government has very substantial
obligations.
I'm not in any way advocating unfair treatment of the
elderly who have, you know, have worked all their lives and
certainly deserve our support and help, but if there are ways
to restructure or strengthen these programs that reduce costs,
I think that's extraordinarily important for us to try to
achieve.
But he didn’t do either. Instead,
as David Dayen recounts, he just said we should cut Social
Security benefits to reduce the long-term deficit even though
this clearly had nothing one way or another to do with the
current labor market situation:
"No second stimulus, no jobs bill, no public investment
to deal with the worst hiring crisis since the Depression, no
relief for a jobless recovery, but yes to cutting
people’s meager Social Security benefit and their health care
in their old age.
And this is what he’s saying when he WANTS his job
back. What will it be if he gets it?"
Hmm...if Bernanke is enraging these guys, maybe I should rethink
my anti-Bernanke
stance.
But really it just highlights the bipartisan nature of
anti-Bernanke sentiment. There are folks on the left and the
right who think that he's not doing enough with the money supply
to spur recovery and job creation. People who think he's creating
too much inflation are mostly, but not wholly, confined to the
right. And the group that thinks that he played a significant
role in regulatory failure and unfairly helped Wall Street is
truly a bipartisan collection.
I consider Bernanke to be an author of the current economic
situation, what with ridiculously low interest rates, excessive
money creation, and crony capitalist bailouts. But he does have
some academic work on inflation targeting, so he is concerned
about inflation. Once inflation is obvious even to him, he might
actually do something about it. Consider who the Obamamessiah
might appoint in his place before you bail on Bernanke.
AStonerii| 12.4.09 @ 2:59PM
Or, it could just be him setting up the plans for Obama and the
Democrats to be able to dig into these things in the not so far
future. Basically he is setting them up for a second stimulus.
Stephen Zierak| 12.4.09 @ 1:24PM
I consider Bernanke to be an author of the current economic situation, what with ridiculously low interest rates, excessive money creation, and crony capitalist bailouts. But he does have some academic work on inflation targeting, so he is concerned about inflation. Once inflation is obvious even to him, he might actually do something about it. Consider who the Obamamessiah might appoint in his place before you bail on Bernanke.
AStonerii| 12.4.09 @ 2:59PM
Or, it could just be him setting up the plans for Obama and the Democrats to be able to dig into these things in the not so far future. Basically he is setting them up for a second stimulus.