Since my hometown team was
humiliated on Monday Night Football last night, I would
normally be reluctant to weigh into a football debate. But the
New England Patriots don't look as bad as some of the sports
commentary coming out of the Bay State. From the Boston Globe: "While we're here ... Can we please
put to rest the ridiculous notion that the AFC is so much
superior to the NFC? Like, right now? OK?"
Now, the difference between the AFC and the NFC is nowhere near
as stark as the gap between the American League and the National
League in baseball. NFC teams regularly win Super Bowls and Pro
Bowls. There are some elite teams in the NFC. But the argument
for parity between the conferences just doesn't wash. Consider
how the Globe sportswriter makes his case: "Look at the
top three clubs, today, in each conference ..." He proceeds to
compare their win-loss records, with the AFC's Colts (11-0),
Bengals (8-3), Chargers (8-3) stacked up against the NFC's Saints
(11-0), Vikings (10-1), Cowboys (8-3). "See?" he seems to be
saying. "The NFC's top three have better records."
The New Orleans Saints and the Minnesota Vikings are indisputably
playing some of the best football in the NFL. But after them, you
immediately drop off to the Dallas Cowboys. The Cowboys have
struggled mightily on offense. Jumbo stadiums, Jerry-trons, and
all the other bread and circus notwithstanding, they are a
franchise with some big wins, painful losses, and exceedingly
narrow victories over terrible teams. The Cowboys barely lead a
division that is teeming with mediocrity, as the Philadelphia
Eagles and New York Giants are only consistent in their
inconsistency. The less that is said about the Washington
Redskins (a team the Cowboys beat by just one point after scoring
only a single, last-minute touchdown), the better. By the end of
the season, it should be clear that Dallas isn't as good as NFC
rivals like the Arizona Cardinals.
When you get below the top three teams in the AFC based on
current win-loss record, you still have the Pittsburgh Steelers,
the Denver Broncos, the Baltimore Ravens, and yes, even in their
attenuated form, the Patriots. The fact that AFC teams, aside
from the Colts, don't have overpowering winning records is itself
a testament to the strength of competition rather than proof of
weakness. The AFC North, for example, contains three powerhouse
teams that were considered legitimate contenders for at least the
AFC Championship game.
That says something right there: Most experts are already
predicting a New Orleans vs. Minnesota showdown for the NFC
title. Relatively few will venture a guess as to the AFC
contenders. Sure, the Saints and the Vikings are as good as any
team in the AFC and have proven it by repeatedly winning
interconference games. But just because you can find a woman who
is taller than a man doesn't mean that men aren't taller than
women on average.
I watch very little thugball. However, I caught parts of two
games last week. The AFC's Oakland and Cleveland teams had
offenses that better resembled a high school's. No imagination
and poorly coached.
…Turn tweets into comments for your WordPress blog. Topsy Plugin – WordPress 1 Shortened Links Linking to the spectator.org page http://bit.ly/7lelfy info 2 tweet retweet The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Yes, the AFC is Better spectator.org/blog/2009/12/01/yes-the-afc-is-better – view page – cached Since my hometown team was humiliated on Monday Night Football last night, I would normally be…
Indiana Alex| 12.1.09 @ 12:51PM
Uh, no.
Dixie Pixie| 12.1.09 @ 1:53PM
AFC vs NFC ?!?!?!?!
The real conflict is between the SEC East vs SEC West.
Will Alabama pull out a win by the tip of their fingertips and
the skin of their teeth like the last few games.
Or will Florida Tebow Alabama just like last year.
The National Championship is on the line this weekend.
AFC, NFC phooey, phooey, phooey.
No drama at all this season.
Oldefarte| 12.1.09 @ 2:40PM
%%%%%ROOOLLLLLL TIDE%%%% !!!!!!!!
JohnD| 12.1.09 @ 3:14PM
Watching The Ravens and Steelers go at it on Sunday night, you
couldn't help but think this game was a cut above anything else
in the NFL. These teams hate each other. The hitting, the
intensity, and the Ravens win in OT made it the game of the year.
Two great teams, great fans, great game.
Pete| 12.1.09 @ 11:08PM
I have to disagree. While both of those teams are good when at
full strength and playing their best, what I saw Sunday night was
neither. The fact that the Ravens couldn't blow out the Steelers
with a terrible 3rd string QB is a sad commentary on them. The
fact that the Steelers couldn't play-call their way out of a
paper bag to steal a game they had no business being in, speaks
to their issues. It was all very sad. That said, I do agree the
AFC kicks the crap out of the NFC, Monday night notwithstanding.
I really enjoyed watching that game and seeing Belicheat take his
ball and go home with 5+ minutes left in the game. Northeastern
cheating socialist types.
Glen Hoffing| 12.1.09 @ 4:41PM
Gee, if only NFC and AFC teams played each other we could solve
this theoretical dispute. Oh, wait, they do play each other. Who
knew?
Sam| 12.1.09 @ 10:14PM
It's nice to drop the politics and talk a little sports here once
in a while. I got only one thing to say:
Go Chargers!!!
Derek Leaberry| 12.1.09 @ 12:41PM
I watch very little thugball. However, I caught parts of two games last week. The AFC's Oakland and Cleveland teams had offenses that better resembled a high school's. No imagination and poorly coached.
Pingback| 12.1.09 @ 12:49PM
Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Yes, the AFC is Better links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Indiana Alex| 12.1.09 @ 12:51PM
Uh, no.
Dixie Pixie| 12.1.09 @ 1:53PM
AFC vs NFC ?!?!?!?!
The real conflict is between the SEC East vs SEC West.
Will Alabama pull out a win by the tip of their fingertips and the skin of their teeth like the last few games.
Or will Florida Tebow Alabama just like last year.
The National Championship is on the line this weekend.
AFC, NFC phooey, phooey, phooey.
No drama at all this season.
Oldefarte| 12.1.09 @ 2:40PM
%%%%%ROOOLLLLLL TIDE%%%% !!!!!!!!
JohnD| 12.1.09 @ 3:14PM
Watching The Ravens and Steelers go at it on Sunday night, you couldn't help but think this game was a cut above anything else in the NFL. These teams hate each other. The hitting, the intensity, and the Ravens win in OT made it the game of the year.
Two great teams, great fans, great game.
Pete| 12.1.09 @ 11:08PM
I have to disagree. While both of those teams are good when at full strength and playing their best, what I saw Sunday night was neither. The fact that the Ravens couldn't blow out the Steelers with a terrible 3rd string QB is a sad commentary on them. The fact that the Steelers couldn't play-call their way out of a paper bag to steal a game they had no business being in, speaks to their issues. It was all very sad. That said, I do agree the AFC kicks the crap out of the NFC, Monday night notwithstanding. I really enjoyed watching that game and seeing Belicheat take his ball and go home with 5+ minutes left in the game. Northeastern cheating socialist types.
Glen Hoffing| 12.1.09 @ 4:41PM
Gee, if only NFC and AFC teams played each other we could solve this theoretical dispute. Oh, wait, they do play each other. Who knew?
Sam| 12.1.09 @ 10:14PM
It's nice to drop the politics and talk a little sports here once in a while. I got only one thing to say:
Go Chargers!!!
pallet racking| 1.8.10 @ 3:11AM
http://www.t-racking.com
http://www.cold-store-equipment.com