MEMO FOR THE MOVEMENT:
Health Care Legislation Creates Colossal New Bureaucracies
RE: The 2,032 page Speaker Pelosi Healthcare bill that was approved by a narrow margin in the House of Representatives on November 7th and the 2,074 page Senator Reid Healthcare bill just introduced creates over 100 new bureaucracies that are sure to be inefficient with taxpayer money.
ACTION: We urge you to contact your Congressman and Senators, as well as to inform your local activists and friends that this bill is a regulatory nightmare destined to create lots of pork barrel projects, more government agencies and endless edicts from Washington, DC that waste taxpayer money.
ISSUE-IN-BRIEF: The health-care bill in its current form would create a regulatory mess estimated by one Senator to add100,000 new administrators in over 100 new bureaucracies. Many of these bureaucracies will get between doctors and patients. Others are simply a waste of money. Among the many new bureaucracies are:
· Health Benefits Advisory Committee
· Health Insurance Exchange
· Public Health Insurance Option
· Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research
· Comparative Effectiveness Research Commission
· Patient Ombudsman for Comparative Effectiveness Research
· Accountable Care Organization Pilot Program
· Community Based Medical Home Pilot Program
· Independent Patient Centered Medical Home Pilot Program
· Qualified Health Benefits Plan Ombudsman
· Grant Program for Health Insurance Cooperatives
· Telehealth Advisory Committee
· Prevention and Wellness Trust
· Personal Care Attendant Workforce Advisory Panel
· Community Prevention Stakeholders Board
To pay for all this new bureaucracy there will be dozens of new taxes totaling nearly $800 billion and extending to items such as wheelchairs and hospital gowns. Almost every major recent public opinion poll has shown more Americans oppose Obama/Pelosi/Reid Care than support it. Just this week, in The Wall Street Journal, the Dean of the Harvard Medical School gave the health care reform debate "a failing grade."
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE BUREAUCRATIC MESS THAT THESE BILLS WILL CREATE PLEASE VISIT THESE WEBSITES:
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner~y2009m11d2-Pelosis-health-care-bill-creates-111-new-federal-Obamacare-bureaucracies
http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/15/truth-and-consequences-of-health-care-reform/
http://townhall.com/columnists/JosephCPhillips/2009/11/16/health_care_and_the_moral_imperative
http://spectator.org/archives/2009/11/11/the-absolutely-worst-bill-ever/
http://www.gop.gov/policy-news/09/11/05/nov-5-2009
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704795604574519671055918380.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703399204574505423751140690.html
http://www.newsok.com/sen.-tom-coburn-says-bill-creates-expanded-bureauc
http://www.newsok.com/sen.-tom-coburn-says-bill-creates-expanded-bureauc
racy/article/3417005?custom_click=pod_lead_politics
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/14/AR2009111402597_pf.html
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124202/No-Clear-Mandate-Americans-Healthcare-Reform.aspx
Tom Schatz, President, Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
William Wilson, President, Americans for Limited Government
Matt Kibbe, President, Freedom Works
Grover Norquist, President, Americans for Tax Reform
Wendy Wright, President, Concerned Women for America
Jim Martin, President, 60 Plus Association
Marion Edwyn Harrison, President, Free Congress Foundation
Herman Cain, President, THE New Voice, Inc.
T. Kenneth Cribb, Jr., former Chief Domestic Advisor to President Reagan
Richard Viguerie, Chairman, ConservativeHQ.com
Tony Perkins, President, Family Research Council
Alfred Regnery, Publisher, American Spectator
James C. Miller III, former Reagan Budget Director
Tom Winter, Editor in Chief, Human Events
Karl Ottosen, Untied States Federation of Small Businesses
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
James Henderson| 11.23.09 @ 5:26PM
The Senate version appears cheaper than the House counterpart . But looks are deceiving. Because benefits start one year later, the Senate version only covers an average of 16.1 million newly insured per year (instead of 21.6 million in the House version). Using CBO estimates and including the obvious additional costs (such as physician SGR), the Senate version costs over $7,300 per newly covered person (the House version is over $6,100). We could write checks to every uninsured person in the country and spend less than $2,000 per person to bring each one up to the level that privately insured persons spend.