By Paul Chesser on 11.23.09 @ 9:52AM
On Friday the New York Times' house global warming
author
Andy Revkin,
reporting on the breaking (Revkin would prefer it be braking)
global
Climategate scandal, said repercussions "continue to unfold"
and that "there's much more to explore, of course."
On Friday the New York Times' house global warming
author
Andy Revkin,
reporting on the breaking (Revkin would prefer it be braking)
global
Climategate scandal, said repercussions "continue to unfold"
and that "there's much more to explore, of course."
So what has Sherlock Andy, Warmth Detector focused on since then?
Yesterday he noted a
study on Antarctic ice loss that comes with "substantial
uncertainty" and a "CO2toon," and then
he elevated from Reader Comments at his original post the
views of University of Chicago climatologist Raymond
Pierrehumbert, who bemoaned the CRU "cyber-attack."
After all, this is a criminal act of vandalism and of
harassment of a group of scientists that are only going about
their business doing science. It represents a whole new
escalation in the war on climate scientists who are only trying
to get at the truth. Think — this was a very concerted and
sophisticated hacker attack.
There is still no proof that this was a hacker attack (CRU
certainly
never stated that was the case) -- it could have been an
insider. And just because I'm prone to add insult to injury, I'd
like to see the evidence that the alarmist RealClimate Web site
was hacked as well, which Revkin
reports as fact. Just askin'.
Meanwhile, it's comforting to know that the Amazing
Revkin is getting after all the "more to explore."
topics:
Global Warming, Environmentalism, Climate Change