The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Nancy-Ann DeParle, the director of the White House Office on Health Reform, insisted on Thursday that new language in Harry Reid’s Senate health care bill would prevent federal funds from being used to cover abortion.

Here’s what DeParle had to say about the measure on a conference call with reporters earlier this afternoon:

“It was carefully worked through by the leader, who cared very much about making sure that this maintains status quo on abortion policy and doesn’t shift federal abortion and conscience clause policy in either a pro-life or a pro-choice direction so it’s very much trying to keep the balance on the scales and ensure that the bill does nothing to restrict or expand existing abortion law. But it is very clear that federal funds cannot be used for abortion coverage or care. So that’s where he struck the balance.  I mean, it’s pretty clear. I don’t know that anyone is 100 percent happy with it because some people would like it to do more to move away from where the federal balance has been in not covering it, and others would like for it to move in the opposite direction. So he’s right there in the middle maintaining the status quo.”

Under the language approved by the House of Representatives, nobody could use federal subsidies toward the purchase of a policy that covered abortion, and abortion could not be covered by the government-run plan. But under pressure from pro-choice groups, Reid placed language in the Senate bill that would work out a complicated formula aimed at segregating funds so that women who received federal subsidies could still purchase policies with abortion services as long as the subsidies didn’t support the cost of the abortion coverage. The bill would also force state insurance exchanges to offer one plan that covers abortion and make it possible for the government-run plan to cover abortion.

Pro-choice lawmakers have backed the Reid language, while the National Right to Life Committee has called it “completely unacceptable.”

Earlier today, Democratic Sen. Kent Conrad acknowledged that he wasn’t yet sure whether the Reid language prevents taxpayer funding for abortions.

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/11/19/wh-health-czar-says-reid-langu

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Meghan McCain Doesn't Get It

Jeffrey Lord | 1:36PM

The Paul Factor

W. James Antle, III | 1:29PM

Bain v. Solyndra

W. James Antle, III | 12:11PM

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The White House Sieve

Jed Babbin | 5.29.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Osceola Who?

Reid Collins | 5.29.12

ADVERTISEMENT