The biggest Election Day surprise yesterday was that a majority
of Maine’s liberal voting pool OK’ed a ballot initiative
protecting the traditional definition of marriage. It’s a double
bombshell given that several New England states — either by
legislative dictate or judicial fiat — have approved same-sex
marriage in recent months.
As the New York Times points
out, same-sex marriage supporters had everything going for
them in Maine — “far more money, volunteers and political
support, and geography” — than conservative forces. Yet they got
an electoral spanking.
What does it show? That marriage protection is still a winning
issue for Republicans, despite clamoring to the contrary by the
party’s wishy-washy moderates. I made that argument in an
AmSpec column in May, and it still holds true today.
Thirty-one states have now approved amendments or laws defining
marriage as a heterosexual institution. On the flip side, about
half-a-dozen states have legalized homosexual marriage through
the legislature or judiciary, never by a direct vote of the
people.
Yes, polls indicate a gradual slide to the left nationally on the
issue, but that holds true for many other positions taken by
conservatives, too. Marriage and abortion are not costing the GOP
elections.
Along those lines, my takeaway from the Maine vote is simple: the
various parts that make up the GOP coalition — fiscal
conservatives, social conservatives, foreign-policy
conservatives, and those in between all three — need to chill.
It’s time we focused more on shared ideals and less on areas of
disagreement.
I’m tired of hearing fiscal conservatives gripe about those
whack-job religious nuts and their abortion and marriage
fetishes. Likewise, it’s wearisome to see social conservatives
rip the small-government policies vital for the welfare of this
country.
The coalition that Ronald Reagan built was both fiscally and
socially conservative, and also strong on national defense. All
three are critical planks of the movement, and bickering between
them doesn’t help.