The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

While we don't yet know the details, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid unvieled a plan today to create a national government health care plan, but allow states to opt-out of it if they choose. While supporters of the measure have touted it as simply federalism, the reality is far different.

The problem is that even if legislation allows individual states to opt out of a government plan, any national plan will incur costs that would likely be borne by all taxpayers, regardless of whether or not their state carries the plan. For instance, any government plan would have to have initial start up costs -- in the House Democrats' bill these amount to $2 billion, which would be given to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. And if the government plan begins losing money and needs to be bailed out by the federal government, taxpayers in all states would bear the burden.

While the House bill includes a provision that would prevent a federal bailout, nobody seriously believes -- especially after the events of the past year -- that future lawmakers would allow a government plan with millions of beneficiaries to fail rather then pump federal money into it.

View all comments (7) | Leave a comment

Pingback| 10.26.09 @ 4:58PM

Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Will an Opt-Out Approac links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…page http://bit.ly/2InZpy info Add Topsy to Your Blog Turn tweets into comments for your WordPress blog. Topsy Plugin for WordPress   2 tweets Tweet The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Will an Opt-Out Approach Really Give States a Choice? spectator.org/blog/2009/10/26/will-an-opt-out-approach-reall – view page – cached While we don't yet know the details, Senate Majority Leader Harry…

Ken (Old Texican)| 10.26.09 @ 5:00PM

I wouldn't trust present day Democrats with a dog-catcher bill!

Every communque to congress should begin with the words in 16 point Type... YOU ARE FIRED! Clean out your desk!

PKane| 10.26.09 @ 5:21PM

Federalism my *Democratic party symbol*!

It'll be just like the "federalism" of everything from stimulus to speed limits tied to highway funds. Sure, you don't *have to* participate, but you still have to pay for it.

BD57| 10.26.09 @ 5:30PM

The "no bailout provision" is worse than "probably ineffective" - - - it's flatly unenforceable.

No Congress can bind a future Congress. Our elected officials know this. Including that provision in the law is a bald-faced attempt to deceive voters.

Liberal Reader| 10.26.09 @ 10:12PM

Yes.

Pingback| 10.26.09 @ 10:59PM

Does Vocal Lesson Really Improve Your Singing By Alot? | My Top Piano Lessons links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

Does Vocal Lesson Really Improve Your Singing By Alot? | My Top Piano

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/10/26/will-an-opt-out-approach-reall
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

Thank Him, Santorum!

Jay D. Homnick | 2.8.12

ADVERTISEMENT