Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid just announced that the
consolidated Senate health care bill would include a government
plan that states would be able to opt out of by 2014.
During an afternoon news conference Reid acknowledged that
inclusion of the government plan would likely mean the defection
of the lone Republican who has supported this bill, Olympia
Snowe. He said he was "disappointed" that the creation of a
government plan "frightened" Snowe, but said he hoped she would
eventually come back to supporting legislation.
By losing Snowe, Reid is taking a huge gamble that every Democrat
in the chamber -- even the handful opposing a government plan --
will stand with him and provide the 60 votes needed to block a
Republican filibuster, even if it means that some will ultimately
vote against the actual bill.
Reid said he was sending the new proposals to the Congressional
Budget Office for evaluation later today, but that he would not
be asking them to evaluate a proposal to "trigger" a government
plan if certain metrics weren't met, which is the favored
approach of Snowe.
The consolidated bill would also allow for the creation of
"co-ops," which were once viewed as a substitute for a government
plan but would now be offered in addition. The "co-ops" would be
non-profit insurers who would enjoy tax exempt status.
Right now, the most likely Democrats to oppose the government
plan would be Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Ben Nelson of Nebraska,
and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, with independent Joe Lieberman
being another wildcard. While Sens. Kent Conrad and Max Baucus
had also opposed a form of the government plan, they would likely
go along with the current bill. Baucus's main objection to a
government plan was that it wouldn't get enough votes, but he was
in the negotiations with Reid for the past several weeks, so
presumably he signed off on the new proposal. And Conrad's main
objection was to a government plan based on Medicare rates, which
he said would bankrupt hospitals in his state of North Dakota.
Presumably, he'd be able to get behind a bill that didn't tie
payment rates to Medicare and that would allow North Dakota to
opt out.
The big question is whether conservative voters in red states can
put enough pressure on the remaining Democratic Senators to make
them more afraid of defying their constituents than they are of
defying Reid. For an idea of how much pressure red state
Democrats are under over this vote, check out this
article on Landrieu from the local Shreveport Times.
The co-ops aren't a bad idea, but if they come with a bunch of
mandates, they're no good.
If the public option is dead, and it probably is, focus should be
put on removing as many mandates as possible (and also even the
slightest possibility of abortion funding) from the plan.
daboss| 10.26.09 @ 4:23PM
Like I stated before – there will be a public option in the bill.
This is the Dems best and ONLY chance for it to pass. And so the
nationalization of the economy will be nearly complete.
Once this passes, the ONLY way out will be states asserting their
10th amendment rights. Short of that, the creeping towards
socialism will never end.
Michele| 10.26.09 @ 4:32PM
And if the government is the adminstrator of these so called
"co-ops" aren't they then offering a government option? So then
all they have done is changed the name and in the end it will be
run by the government anyway.
Jim O'Brien| 10.27.09 @ 7:43AM
The medical legislation pending in Congress should be aborted. It
will be a step backwards for most Americans. It will make medical
treatment and insurance far more expensive, further limit our
healthcare choices, threaten the lives of seniors, increase our
taxes, and increase the national debt beyond its already obscene
level.
At the same time it will cause doctors to retire early,
discourage young people from becoming doctors, reduce research
and development of new drugs and procedures, increase waiting
times for treatment, and reduce the quality of medical care.
The entire plan should be abandoned. Congress should step back
and study the real problem, which is too much government
involvement and meddling with the free market. We need far less
government, not more. For example, the HMO Act should be
repealed.
What makes Congress think that the American Kremlin can manage
healthcare for over 300 million people? This is the same
government that can't stop illegal immigration, can't reduce our
dependence on foreign oil, can't address the debt which is
spiraling out of control, can't stop the devaluation of the
dollar or curtail 10% unemployment, and can't figure out what to
do with a few hundred Gitmo terrorists.
None of us want this feckless, incompetent and corrupt government
managing our healthcare or our lives.
Matt| 10.26.09 @ 4:01PM
The co-ops aren't a bad idea, but if they come with a bunch of mandates, they're no good.
If the public option is dead, and it probably is, focus should be put on removing as many mandates as possible (and also even the slightest possibility of abortion funding) from the plan.
daboss| 10.26.09 @ 4:23PM
Like I stated before – there will be a public option in the bill. This is the Dems best and ONLY chance for it to pass. And so the nationalization of the economy will be nearly complete.
Once this passes, the ONLY way out will be states asserting their 10th amendment rights. Short of that, the creeping towards socialism will never end.
Michele| 10.26.09 @ 4:32PM
And if the government is the adminstrator of these so called "co-ops" aren't they then offering a government option? So then all they have done is changed the name and in the end it will be run by the government anyway.
Jim O'Brien| 10.27.09 @ 7:43AM
The medical legislation pending in Congress should be aborted. It will be a step backwards for most Americans. It will make medical treatment and insurance far more expensive, further limit our healthcare choices, threaten the lives of seniors, increase our taxes, and increase the national debt beyond its already obscene level.
At the same time it will cause doctors to retire early, discourage young people from becoming doctors, reduce research and development of new drugs and procedures, increase waiting times for treatment, and reduce the quality of medical care.
The entire plan should be abandoned. Congress should step back and study the real problem, which is too much government involvement and meddling with the free market. We need far less government, not more. For example, the HMO Act should be repealed.
What makes Congress think that the American Kremlin can manage healthcare for over 300 million people? This is the same government that can't stop illegal immigration, can't reduce our dependence on foreign oil, can't address the debt which is spiraling out of control, can't stop the devaluation of the dollar or curtail 10% unemployment, and can't figure out what to do with a few hundred Gitmo terrorists.
None of us want this feckless, incompetent and corrupt government managing our healthcare or our lives.