The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

An American "One-Child" Policy?

Should the U.S. join China with a one-child policy?  Maybe not through forced abortion, but how about with carbon credits?  That's the, um, "interesting" idea from New York Times environmental reporter Andrew Revkin.

Reports Cybercast News Service:

At the event, Revkin said: "Well, some of the people have recently proposed: Well, should there be carbon credits for a family planning program in Africa let's say? Should that be monetized as a part of something that, you know, if you, if you can measurably somehow divert fertility rate, say toward an accelerating decline in a place with a high fertility rate, shouldn't there be a carbon value to that? 

"And I have even proposed recently, I can't remember if it's in the blog, but just think about this: Should--probably the single-most concrete and substantive thing an American, young American, could do to lower our carbon footprint is not turning off the lights or driving a Prius, it's having fewer kids, having fewer children," said Revkin.

"So should there be, eventually you get, should you get credit--If we're going to become carbon-centric--for having a one-child family when you could have had two or three," said Revkin. "And obviously it's just a thought experiment, but it raises some interesting questions about all this."

When CNSNews.com later followed up with questions about his comments, Revkin responded in an e-mail.

"I wasn't endorsing any of this, simply laying out the math and noting the reality that if one were serious about the population-climate intersection, it'd be hard to avoid asking hard questions about USA population growth," wrote Revkin.

Heck, if Congress votes to wreck the economy with cap and trade, and nationalize the health care system, who is going to want to have kids?  Maybe that's the Obama administration's secret plan.  Make us so miserable that population growth will drop to zero!

Comments

Pingback| 10.25.09 @ 5:20PM

Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : An American "One-Child" links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…http://bit.ly/1Lphg0 info Tags #amspec #tcot Add Topsy to Your Blog Turn tweets into comments for your WordPress blog. Topsy Plugin for WordPress   3 tweets Tweet The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : An American "One-Child" Policy? spectator.org/blog/2009/10/25/an-american-one-child-policy – view page – cached Should the U.S. join China with a one-child policy? Maybe not through forced…

Richard Baker| 10.25.09 @ 6:33PM

Did you notice that "death" seems to be a central theme with these liberals? Someone's got to die to make them happy, seemingly.

No Hammer No Sickle| 10.25.09 @ 7:08PM

Liberals are idiots and fascists. Even if we forget for a moment that global warming theory is full of crappy science, bad models and politicians overruling scientific testing... This is just plain un-American.

Liberals can't expect us to pile up massive debt for our children and create massive entitlements that push obligations out into the future like Social Insecurity, MediCare and MediCaid while simultaneously destroying those programs which ONLY work if we have a reasonably high population growth.

Slowing our native population growth will only encourage more illegal immigration from our neighbors and it will in the end become a zero sum game while also destroying our culture through monocultural immigration. Liberals who would encourage this have zero common sense.

Johnno| 10.26.09 @ 2:04AM

No Hammer, great post!

Patty| 10.26.09 @ 2:10AM

Another day, another liberal monster. Their numbers seem endless.

Soviet Union| 11.17.09 @ 1:53PM

FOR THE MOTHERLAND! ALWAYS REMEMBER COMMUNIST RUSSIA. DEATH TO THE UNITED STATES!

Hammer and Sickle| 11.17.09 @ 1:57PM

Great comment! FOR THE MOTHERLAND!

lol| 11.17.09 @ 1:55PM

un-american? I have lost all respect for the united states. You ppl are losers.

TWoPolitics| 10.25.09 @ 7:26PM

Please - don't give Obama and his thugs any more ideas than they have already proposed.

Pingback| 10.25.09 @ 7:56PM

Carbon Credits for Condoms - Vladimir’s blog - RedState links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…valuable carbon credits would be to pay for the, um, negating of children who’ve already been conceived … or to pay for voluntary sterilizations … hmmm? H/T Doug Bandow, of the American Spectator blog, who comments: Heck, if Congress votes to wreck the economy with cap and trade, and nationalize the health care system, who is going to want to have kids? Maybe that’s the Obama…

Pingback| 10.25.09 @ 8:34PM

Carbon Credits for Condoms | Social Debate: Barack and American Politics links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

Carbon Credits for Condoms | Social Debate: Barack and American

Andy Revkin| 10.25.09 @ 9:16PM

When I use a word like "carbon-centric," it's one thing for Rush Limbaugh not to catch the irony, but American Spectator?
More: http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes......and-death/
http://j.mp/NPRonRush

blackberry cases| 10.25.09 @ 9:47PM

it is nice!ed hardy shirt

Pingback| 10.25.09 @ 10:56PM

Carbon Credits for Condoms | WTF?! Obama links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…valuable carbon credits would be to pay for the, um, negating of children who’ve already been conceived … or to pay for voluntary sterilizations … hmmm? H/T Doug Bandow, of the American Spectator blog, who comments: Heck, if Congress votes to wreck the economy with cap and trade, and nationalize the health care system, who is going to want to have kids? Maybe that’s the Obama…

Trurl| 10.26.09 @ 1:22AM

Typical discrimination, implying that only "families" would be eligible for this credit. What defines a family? A man and a woman? Two men? Me and me cat maybe?? Why should I, a 45 year old male, not be permitted to take part in the largess; to suckle at the teat! I demand my credits, moreover I want one every time I ejaculate without actually impregnating anyone. Yea, every time I, shall we say, keep my hands to myself, I save the Earth. Pay me.

Gina| 10.26.09 @ 2:08AM

I guess you and your private bits could comprise a family--one inwhich no one else wants to join, that is.

Yucky, yucky, yucky.

Crusader| 10.26.09 @ 8:29AM

All the climate-change wackos and over-population zealots should put their money where their mouth is. If they truly believe that overpopulation is a problem, why don't they off themselves? Remember, if "charity begins at home," so does population control. I'll even supply the shotgun and shells for as many libtard kooks as possible to help mother earth by killing themselves.

cocksucker| 11.17.09 @ 1:48PM

agreed

Pingback| 10.26.09 @ 8:59AM

Carbon Credits for Condoms « Yuvablog links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…valuable carbon credits would be to pay for the, um, negating of children who’ve already been conceived … or to pay for voluntary sterilizations … hmmm? H/T Doug Bandow, of the American Spectator blog, who comments: Heck, if Congress votes to wreck the economy with cap and trade, and nationalize the health care system, who is going to want to have kids? Maybe that’s the Obama…

Pingback| 10.26.09 @ 8:07PM

Environmentalists call for restrictions on number of children « Wintery Knight links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…Personal Podcasts Polemics Polls Videos Older » 10/26/2009 • 8:00 PM Environmentalists call for restrictions on number of children Here’s the first story from CNS News. (H/T American Spectator via ECM) Here’s New York Times reporter Andrew Revkin. Excerpt: At the event, Revkin said: “Well, some of the people have recently proposed: Well, should there be carbon credits for a…

Pingback| 10.26.09 @ 9:35PM

Health-Fitness|Medicine|Weight Loss|Beauty|Lifestyle|Diabetes » Environmentalists sup links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…Xia Google My Yahoo! newsgator Bloglines iNezha Environmentalists support restrictions on number of children per family October 26th, 2009 | Tags: Here’s the first story from CNS News. (H/T American Spectator via ECM) Here’s New York Times reporter Andrew Revkin. Excerpt: At the event, Revkin said: “Well, some of the people have recently proposed: Well, should there be carbon credits for a…

ugg classic cardy| 12.4.09 @ 9:12AM

Welcome to our website: http://www.infls.com
As the commodities we supply are of excellent quality and low price,
we have won a very good reputation from our clients all over the world.
If you are interested in any of our products, please don't hesitate to contact with me by email.
i trust that through our cooperation we shall be able to conclude some transactions with you in the near future.
Website: http://www.mbtshoe.co.uk
Best regards!

rolex replica paypal| 12.9.09 @ 11:15PM

Great post!
Excellent reproduction rolex replica paypal,Welcome to choose!
Thanks!

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

Obama's Miranda Madness

Less than an hour into the interrogation of the Christmas Day "underwear bomber," the U.S. Justice Department instructed FBI agents to advise Abdulmutallab — an al Qaeda operative from Nigeria — of his Miranda rights. Shockingly, interviews since have yielded "no actionable intelligence."

Stop plea bargaining with terrorists!

ADVERTISEMENT