The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Robert Pape , professor of political science at the University of Chicago testified today before the House Armed Services Terrorism, Unconventional Threats and Capabilities Subcommittee. Arguing against a troop increase in Afghanistan, the professor argued instead for a containment strategy where Western and Afghan forces would protect towns from increasing Taliban takeover but gradually scale-down forces while still financially aiding locals from afar. Pape believes that the presence of American troops has largely caused the insurgency to take place. He says in his New York Times piece, “The more Western troops we have sent to Afghanistan, the more the local residents have viewed themselves as under foreign occupation, leading to a rise in suicide bombings and other terrorist attacks.”

While it seems to be common sense that the presence of American troops in a combat area increases the chances of American troops being attacked, the assertion that the presence of the Western troops is the cause of the violence seems dubious. Rather, the relative absence of American troops has left a power vacuum in South Afghanistan that the Taliban has exploited to develop an insurgency. As recently in 2006, there were only 20,000 American forces in Afghanistan, while there were 160,000 American forces in Iraq during the 2007 surge– a country smaller than Afghanistan in both geographic size and population. During this time, the Afghan Taliban made advances over the Pashtun region and suicide attacks against Americans and Afghan government security forces skyrocketed to an average of around 120 incidences per year since 2006.

If we try a containment strategy without more troops, there is absolutely no guarantee that the Taliban will not continue to strengthen and secure more Afghan towns, including Kandahar. Meanwhile, Al-Qaeda will enjoy a safe haven in the Taliban-occupied areas and have resources available to train foreigners for attacks in Western Countries. The safe havens allowed the network to flourish in the late 1990s when American troops were entirely absent, and that flourishing safe haven is reported to be happening again along the lawless Pakistan border.

Our troops are not the problem, but rather, the problem is the Taliban. Our troops could be part of the solution in defeating Al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan if the requests for additional troops are approved by the president.

topics:
War on Terror, Afghanistan War

View all comments (11) |

2Anglico| 10.22.09 @ 1:59PM

Yes, Mr. Pape, and the presence of cops on the streets causes crack house lodgers to kill the cops.

Crusader| 10.22.09 @ 2:44PM

Throwing more troops at the problem in Afghanistan without a change in ROE is like throwing money at any lib-backed money-pit: Education, War on Poverty, etc. For some reason the USA thinks we can use the failed "hearts and minds" strategy of Viet Nam in Afghanistan. How's that workin' out for us so far?

There's only one way to deal with Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, etc etc etc. Only problem is you can't say it in "polite company."

Pingback| 10.23.09 @ 12:14AM

President Obama’s rhetoric is dividing this nation and fueling hatred—much of it aime links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…calls for perseverance in Afghanistan Afghan opium feeding 15,000,000 addicts worldwide Kerry steadfast for NATO Who let the dogs out? White House responds to Cheney’s Afghanistan barb In Afghanistan, are our troops the problem? EU honors Russia rights group after activist’s death India, China unite before Copenhagen India’s navy has a plan to deal with sea piracy Pakistan students sent home Obama team meets on…

Rich Rostrom| 10.23.09 @ 3:42AM

Crusader: "hearts & minds" worked just fine in Viet Nam. There were many many cases of U.S. cadres leading Vietnamese forces in successful defenses of towns against heavy VC/NVA assaults. The problem was that Westmoreland neglected it in favor of "Search & Destroy".

After Abrams replaced Westmoreland, ARVN trained up to the point where it defeated the 1972 NVA invasion with no U.S. ground forces.

But Cronkite and the media had decided the war was lost was after the Tet offensive.

Crusader| 10.23.09 @ 8:47AM

Wow it did? Is that why South Viet Nam is a free and independent constitutional republic now?????

(What was Saigon renamed again?)

And they say the Left are the only ones to revise history. Again. Wow.

Hmmm. Have you ever BEEN to Afghanistan?

Pingback| 10.23.09 @ 2:55PM

The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : In Afghanistan, Are Our … | Afghanistan Today links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…strategy where Western and Afghan forces would protect towns from increasing Taliban takeover but gradually scale-down forces while still … Here is the original: The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : In Afghanistan, Are Our … Share and Enjoy: Tags: a-false-threat, afghan, Afghanistan, all-for, and-counting, false-threat, from-increasing, professor, seen-the-rush, still, taliban Afghanistan Leave…

Pingback| 10.23.09 @ 2:55PM

The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : In Afghanistan, Are Our … | Afghanistan Today links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…where Western and Afghan forces would protect towns from increasing Taliban takeover but gradually scale-down forces while still … See the original post here: The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : In Afghanistan, Are Our … Share and Enjoy: Tags: a-false-threat, a-troop-increase, afghan, Afghanistan, fellow, fellow-brothers, from-increasing, professor, rush, seen-the-rush, still, taliban,…

UChicago| 11.11.09 @ 3:02PM

Mr. O'Connell obviously hasn't done enough research into Suicide Terrorism (unlike Professor Pape). Pape's analysis doesn't expound on some nonsense theory, rather it finds its basis in empirical evidence. Every single case of suicide terrorism has been linked to perceived Foreign occupation by a democracy. This is a fact. Every single case!

Mr. O'Connell, Robert Pape is the world's foremost expert on Suicide Terrorism. Robert Pape is one of the most prominent Political Scientists and Defense Academics in the United States. The man has top secret clearance; I dare say he knows more about the subject than you do.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Brian O'Connell

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/10/22/in-afghanistan-are-our-troops

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT