The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

Key Dem Senator Doesn't Think Other Heath Care Bill Should Be Paid For

As I've noted, one of the tricks Democrats are employing to claim that health care legislation will cost less than $900 billion and not add to the deficit is to move nearly $250 billion of spending to a separate bill. Even the Washington Post has editorialized that it's "nonsensical" for Democrats to claim that the additional bill, which would prevent scheduled cuts to Medicare doctors' payments, is not part of health care reform.

Now, Roll Call is reporting that Sen. Debbie Stabenow, the chief sponsor of this so called "doc fix" legislation, is blasting the idea that this spending should be offset so that it doesn't add to the deficit:

Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) on Tuesday rejected bipartisan demands that her legislation extending Medicare payments to doctors include provisions to offset its massive $245 billion price tag, arguing a one-year pay-for in the larger health care bill is sufficient.

“We’re not moving forward from the basis of offsets,” Stabenow said, accusing Republicans of using the issue to try to scuttle the broader health care reform effort.

UPDATE: House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer is warning Harry Reid that it must be paid for, and says Nancy Pelosi agrees.

Comments

ed hardy shirt| 10.20.09 @ 10:24PM

GHD
ed hardy shirt

Dean| 10.21.09 @ 9:46AM

I think I'll just pretend to pay my taxes just like Rep. Stabenow wants to pretend that we are paying for this new $250 billion worth of spending.

Pingback| 10.22.09 @ 8:05AM

The AMA’s Quisling Strategy | America Watches Obama links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…a provision that would repeal SGR. Meanwhile, the absence of such a provision in the Senate Finance Committee bill produced a noticeably tepid response from the good doctor, despite a $250 billion sop to Cerberus that purports to solve the SGR problem. There are, of course, legitimate reasons to oppose the SGR. This payment formula, like the PPS methodology to which the federal government subjects most…

Pingback| 10.23.09 @ 1:25PM

The AMA’s Quisling Strategy – Another Idea links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…a provision that would repeal SGR. Meanwhile, the absence of such a provision in the Senate Finance Committee bill produced a noticeably tepid response from the good doctor, despite a $250 billion sop to Cerberus that purports to solve the SGR problem. There are, of course, legitimate reasons to oppose the SGR. This payment formula, like the PPS methodology to which the federal government subjects most…

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

In Sum, IPCC Discredited

Paul Chesser

* * * *

That Dangerous Radical . . . Marvin Olasky?

Robert Stacy McCain

* * * *

Forget the Committees

Greg Scandlen

* * * *

Reid Disses David Broder

Philip Klein

* * * *

Moment of Truth

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

No Sales Days in the Afghan War

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Bureaucrats With Badges

Mark Hyman

* * * *

Obama in Wonderland

Ken Blackwell

* * * *

A Writer Speaks

William Tucker

* * * *

What Has Changed?

Robert P. Kirchhoefer

* * * *

High Stakes

Manon McKinnon

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT