The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

The Washington Post reported last week that members of the Obama administration are seeking to incorporate the Taliban into the Afghan government in a way similar to the way Hezbollah participates in the Lebanese government -- maintaining control over parts of the country and participating in the government as a minority faction. Witnesses testified this morning before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs against such a reported approach to dealing with the Taliban.

The Taliban and Al-Qaeda are  "genetically and... ideologically mixed," said J. Alexander Thier, director of Afghanistan and Pakistan at the U.S. Institute of Peace.  Thier cited the intermarriages between the Taliban and Al-Qaeda along with Al-Qaeda's support for the Taliban's rise to power in the 1990s. Frederick Kagan, who also testified this morning, strongly agreed, "it (a Taliban safe haven) would be almost certain to provide Al-Qaeda with a haven that we would not be able to access."  Kagan and Thier also pointed out that leadership has become increasingly linked to Al-Qaeda during the current war against the Afghan government and the United States.

Some Democrats and a few Republicans do not want the United States to fight the Taliban, but rather wish only to fight Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. The implication is that fewer American forces would be needed, and troops would be used mainly in a more limited counter-terrorism strategy against Al-Qaeda. While the Taliban and Al-Qaeda are not identical, the former Taliban government housed Osama Bin Laden and has killed hundreds of American troops in the insurgency. Such an approach to co-op the Taliban seems like overly-wishful thinking.

topics:
War on Terror, Afghanistan War

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

louis vuitton| 4.26.10 @ 10:26PM

we have won a very good reputation said yet canada goose another ACORN revelation (presumably from the O'Keefe/Giles video duo) is coming tomorrow, and he characterized it as "devastating.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Brian O'Connell

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/10/15/all-in-the-family-the-taliban

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT