The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

It would be nice if the label were more consistently applied to Republicans (or anyone really) who vote against bailouts, new unfunded entitlements, unconstitutional federal programs, and using our military for social work. Or who occasionally side against power. Or who don't leave me on hold during conference calls listening to instrumental versions of "Tears in Heaven."

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

S.L. Toddard| 10.14.09 @ 8:01PM

There's already a perfectly good term that describes such people: "real conservatives".

Unfortunately, you won't find them called that or "maverick". "Maverick" has the air of a compliment, and implies a virtuous straight-shooter who defies expectation by holding to his principles in the face of opposition from his own party, and the sort of people Mr. Antle describes here are more likely to be reviled than complimented by either the left or right. David Frum classified that sort as "Unpatriotic Conservatives", and the chorus on the right that accompanied his jeering was near unanimous. The left is more likely than not to portray them as kooks, and then point to the disdain of the Lindsay Grahams and David Frums as evidence that they are so outside of the mainstream as to be beneath consideration.

As for those "who occasionally side against power" - they have few friends on the right as well - ostensibly their own side. Rather than siding against power, today's Right is far more likely to exhibit a servile, near religious reverence for Authority and muscle-flexing displays of power - they fetishize "rough men", empty bravado, macho posturing and military confrontation, and swoon, weak-kneed and giddy, over armed agents of the state.

The Right needs to re-learn to fear their government as the Founders did - even when it is in Republican hands. They need to listen to and follow those who speak truth to power from the right, those true mavericks who fight to wrangle the federal beast back into its constitutional cage, and who endeavor to return to the people and the states the powers that the federal government has usurped and the wealth that it has confiscated.

And lastly they must ask themselves whether they truly advocate small government, or whether they would rather retain the sort of gargantuan leviathan state necessary to the task of policing the world and building whole nations out of thin air, rubble and dust.

We cannot have both.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/10/14/more-maverick-thoughts

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT