The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

While President Obama has made bending the health care cost curve central to his drive to overhaul the nation's health care system, Congressional Budget Office director Doug Elmendorf testified this morning that last week's much-touted analysis by the CBO did not measure whether the Senate Finance Committee would achieve this.

Under questioning by Sen. Mike Crapo during today's Finance Committee hearing, Elmendorf said that the CBO's analysis focused only on the bill's effects on the federal budget, but not on whether it would reduce national health care expenditures overall.

This is an important distinction. It's easy to achieve deficit reduction in a bill -- at least on paper -- if you simply raise taxes by more than you increasing spending. Because the Finance Committee bill raises taxes and promises cuts to Medicare that may never materialize, the CBO  estimated that it would reduce the deficit by $81 billion over 10 years. But that doesn't mean it the CBO is saying it would decrease the overall amount that the nation is spending on health care, lower the cost of insurance premiums, or reduce health care spending as a percentage of GDP.

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

JP| 10.13.09 @ 12:34PM

According to the Senate Plan, taxpayers and businesses would begin paying into ObamaCare in 2010, but ObamaCare would not begin paying out until 2013. Thier 10 year outlook has 10 years of collecting revenues, but only 7 years of paying out benefits. That is why they can say, the Plan will not run a decadal defecit; however, once people begin collecting benefits, the defecits begin, and they accelerate. But, at the end of the 10 year period ObamaCare is still in the black.

This is misinformation at its worst. And what pray tell, happens between 2010 and 2013. What will happen to everyone's premiums? How many doctors and nurses will retire or call it quits. How many of the smaller insurance corporations will just get out of the health care business? Have any of these bean counters ever heard of the Law of Unintended Consequences?

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/10/13/elmendorf-says-cbo-score-does

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT