Gee, I'm sure she's a nice person. But openly admitting that the
Obama White House views the mainstream liberal media as a
political ally is perhaps not the smartest way to go for Obama
communications director Anita Dunn.
"We're going to treat them the way we would treat an opponent,"
said Anita Dunn, the White House communications director, in a
telephone interview on Sunday. "As they are undertaking a war
against Barack Obama and the White House, we don't need to
pretend that this is the way that legitimate news organizations
behave."
So, perforce, if Fox is "an opponent," this means the rest of the
so-called "mainstream media" is, in the eyes of Dunn and the
Obama White House, the opposite. To wit: a supporter. An ally.
Oops.
Give Ms. Dunn points for honesty. Or at least unintentioned
candor.
…philipaklein Philip Klein amspec American Spectator 115 Show more Shortened Links Linking to the spectator.org page http://bit.ly/sjEH0 info 3 tweets Tweet The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Obama Aide Dunn Admits Media Is Ally spectator.org/blog/2009/10/12/obama-aide-dunn-admits-media-i – view page – cached Gee, I'm sure she's a nice person. But openly admitting that the Obama…
Desiree| 10.12.09 @ 5:27PM
Obilivously, Ms. Dunn is a result of another "failure" for the
Obama vetting process. She doesn't mind the media as long as it
is only reporting what she wants. If not, then she claims they
are not a true reporting network. It sure would be nice if the
Obama administration would stop stepping on the American right to
free speech (aka town hall meetings that were called racists) or
freedom of the press (going after Fox News). If you can't take
run with the big dogs without whinning Ms. Dunn, then you might
want to stay on the porch!
Alan Brooks| 10.12.09 @ 7:41PM
I say more Rushes, less Becks.
We need the highest quality now.
Daisy| 10.13.09 @ 1:52AM
More Rush, more Beck!! When has Beck been wrong?
Greg Brown| 10.12.09 @ 5:30PM
WOW ! Send me any info on how I can help.
Uncle Albert| 10.12.09 @ 5:42PM
Oh my, aren't we smart. That kind of thinking reminds me of
George Bush's statement that "you're either with us or against
us", which enraged most of our allies, who slowly pulled out of
Iraq when they realized they'd be pulled into a scam. Simpletons
think like that. (Another example of this kind of simplistic
thinking: If they're not against us, they must be on our side). I
give you one simpleminded dog credit for that one. At least it's
one step above swine thought.
Daisy| 10.13.09 @ 2:02AM
Swine thought? You mean the group-think of the petty swine in the
White House?
dan| 10.12.09 @ 5:54PM
oh jesus. Thats the perfect definition of taking something out of
context. Really now your just embarrassing yourself, showing how
desperate you are. Give it a rest.
Becky| 10.12.09 @ 6:02PM
Well, the press is an important part of our system, and while it
can cut both ways, the definintion of what constitutes a
legitimate press seems to be one that is tested case by case in a
court of law. Unless they are violating the law with libel,
defamation, etc. they are free to operate.
I do believe it was Fox Business that sued under the FOIA to get
information about TARP. They had to sue the most transparent
administration and won.
So, for the time being, it is not the WH, Congress, nor the press
that is the arbitor of what information falls under freedom of
the press, but, it seems, that other branch, the unelected one,
the Court.
Elaine Powell| 10.12.09 @ 6:06PM
What is happening to our freedoms? Cannot our citizens of this
great country see what our government is coming to? Forget what
party you belong to, just look at what is happening in Washington
and ask yourself, is this what freedom really means to you?
Crooks in the White House running our country....They call us
racists, they refer to us as mobs, they want to stuff a health
reform down our throats that they have not bothered to
read....they refuse to stand up to our enemies with force. They
think by talking they can stop them...God help us!
Wake up, America before it's too late.
Jeffrey Lord| 10.12.09 @ 6:16PM
Uncle Albert and Dan...
These people won the election. Mr. Obama is the president. His
staff works for the president.
Perhaps they should act it.
Ken (Old Texican)| 10.12.09 @ 7:50PM
Mr. Lord
You probably should consider staying out of the comments section.
(grin)
That was the weakest, most pointless comment here since last
Toddard dropped in. (heh)
Ned| 10.12.09 @ 8:26PM
Fox should be honored. It is legitimate to ask if Fox is
classified an opponent, then what category does CNN and all the
other usual suspects belong?
This action by the White House will further strengthen and unify
their opposition. It seems to me these Obama sycophants do not
wish to fairly face any disagreement concerning their leader’s
demands, and Fox is one of the few who offer a soapbox for this
perceived antagonism. I hope this will add to the current
administration’s undoing and bring about the change we can
believe in.
David| 10.12.09 @ 11:03PM
Fox News can also be called, The Jesus Channel/ GOP TV/ The
Glorious Official Republican Government News Network.
While Fox News has the highest ratings, it’s also the same group
of people that make up just 20% of America’s electorate… the far
right-wing of the GOP.
There will always be an audience for the far right and that’s
Rupert Murdock’s Fox News demographic.
Rupert keeps them frothing at the mouth with manufactured fear
and GOP talking-points, phony outrage.
Fox is also a right-wing echo chamber.. notice that when “The
Wall Street Journal”, “The Weekly Standard” people are on Fox
News there’s never disclosure that these people are all Rupert
Murdock employees.
Imagine if MSNBC or CNN did this… I don’t know how Fox News gets
way with constantly recycling Rupert Murdock’s employees
(sockpuppets) from his various media properties.
There’s hardly a word on the “MSM” about Murdock’s world wide
(far right-wing) media empire.
Murdock has a lot of influence, example: all of his various
sockpuppets, Hannity, Beck, etc, and all of Murdock’s worldwide
media holdings trash global warming, President Obama and anything
else right-wing Rupert Murdock dislikes.
I think that press and especially individual journalists are
deathly afraid of Rupert Murdock and what he can do to them
professionally.
Rupert Murdock is the new William Randolph Hearst.
Another thing, Sarah Palin, who is a favorite among the Faux
News/ Right-wing crowd is getting Rupert Murdock’s wingnut
welfare.
Palin’s (Rupert Murdock’s ghostwriter) book publisher is
HarperCollins… a wholly owned Rupert Murdock subsidiary, you
‘betcha.
Also, there should be an award given to the guy that writes the
ominous, scary music for Fox News... he's obviously a full-time
employee.
No seriously... whenever there's a special where Rupert Murdock
wants to convince Americans that Saddam Hussein has WMD, or that
Iran/North Korea is going to attack America tomorrow, or a
Hannity or Beck segment where they want to scare their right-wing
audience (even more) there's always that ominous music to go
along with the story.
It's like a scary GOP music video.
Margie| 10.13.09 @ 12:55AM
I think Art Bell has a space ship he'd like to sell to you,
kiddo. It's ready for take off... counting down.. 10... 9....
8.... 7.... 6.... 5..................
Daisy| 10.13.09 @ 1:57AM
Liar troll. Studies prove that Fox's audience is by far the most
diverse of all the networks. Conservatives, moderates and
liberals all watch Fox.
Hurt don't it?
BTW, freak; Conservatives comprise 40% of the
population--Liberals just 20%. Read it and weep.
Daisy| 10.13.09 @ 1:59AM
I'll tell you what's really scary; the spittle-flecked visage of
Keith Doberman on PMSNBC. Good gosh almighty, what a bonehead!
Jeffrey Lord| 10.13.09 @ 9:03AM
David...
News flash. The Weekly Standard is not owned by Rupert Murdoch.
It was sold.
If you think about it, this is just a case of the other shoe
dropping.
I mean, didn't those morons in the White House just recently make
an open attack on Fox News? That's pretty much an open admission
right there of alliance with the rest of the media, since the
rest of the media is also attacking Fox.
Yeah, the left-stream media are all in the tank for their
Messiah. Why should they pretend otherwise anymore? No one was
buying what they were selling.
martin j smith| 10.13.09 @ 8:37AM
Fox news is to be congratulated for upsetting the white house and
it should get a Nobel Prize for being the only TV media to buck
the system. In addition it is also the TV station that actually
has differing views or debate,scream at each other or
whatever.
So to those who think Fox news only atttracts a small percentage
of the far right --you are wrong. That is because some of us can
see thru the BS of CNN,CNBC,PBS you name it. Really sprouting a
Party line that sounds like the Comintern of the 1930s is easy to
spot--for those of us who studied history.
…opponent,” this means the rest of the so-called “mainstream media” is, in the eyes of Dunn and the Obama White House, the opposite. To wit: a supporter. An ally. http://spectator.org/blog/2009/10/12/oba… Ahhhh so no opposing views are allowed in the Marxist Regime of Obama now? Why is Obama so afraid of the big bad Fox News Network, are they supposed to march lock step like a good…
It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the
information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of
post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.
Pingback| 10.12.09 @ 4:53PM
Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Obama Aide Dunn Admits links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Desiree| 10.12.09 @ 5:27PM
Obilivously, Ms. Dunn is a result of another "failure" for the Obama vetting process. She doesn't mind the media as long as it is only reporting what she wants. If not, then she claims they are not a true reporting network. It sure would be nice if the Obama administration would stop stepping on the American right to free speech (aka town hall meetings that were called racists) or freedom of the press (going after Fox News). If you can't take run with the big dogs without whinning Ms. Dunn, then you might want to stay on the porch!
Alan Brooks| 10.12.09 @ 7:41PM
I say more Rushes, less Becks.
We need the highest quality now.
Daisy| 10.13.09 @ 1:52AM
More Rush, more Beck!! When has Beck been wrong?
Greg Brown| 10.12.09 @ 5:30PM
WOW ! Send me any info on how I can help.
Uncle Albert| 10.12.09 @ 5:42PM
Oh my, aren't we smart. That kind of thinking reminds me of George Bush's statement that "you're either with us or against us", which enraged most of our allies, who slowly pulled out of Iraq when they realized they'd be pulled into a scam. Simpletons think like that. (Another example of this kind of simplistic thinking: If they're not against us, they must be on our side). I give you one simpleminded dog credit for that one. At least it's one step above swine thought.
Daisy| 10.13.09 @ 2:02AM
Swine thought? You mean the group-think of the petty swine in the White House?
dan| 10.12.09 @ 5:54PM
oh jesus. Thats the perfect definition of taking something out of context. Really now your just embarrassing yourself, showing how desperate you are. Give it a rest.
Becky| 10.12.09 @ 6:02PM
Well, the press is an important part of our system, and while it can cut both ways, the definintion of what constitutes a legitimate press seems to be one that is tested case by case in a court of law. Unless they are violating the law with libel, defamation, etc. they are free to operate.
I do believe it was Fox Business that sued under the FOIA to get information about TARP. They had to sue the most transparent administration and won.
So, for the time being, it is not the WH, Congress, nor the press that is the arbitor of what information falls under freedom of the press, but, it seems, that other branch, the unelected one, the Court.
Elaine Powell| 10.12.09 @ 6:06PM
What is happening to our freedoms? Cannot our citizens of this great country see what our government is coming to? Forget what party you belong to, just look at what is happening in Washington and ask yourself, is this what freedom really means to you? Crooks in the White House running our country....They call us racists, they refer to us as mobs, they want to stuff a health reform down our throats that they have not bothered to read....they refuse to stand up to our enemies with force. They think by talking they can stop them...God help us!
Wake up, America before it's too late.
Jeffrey Lord| 10.12.09 @ 6:16PM
Uncle Albert and Dan...
These people won the election. Mr. Obama is the president. His staff works for the president.
Perhaps they should act it.
Ken (Old Texican)| 10.12.09 @ 7:50PM
Mr. Lord
You probably should consider staying out of the comments section. (grin)
That was the weakest, most pointless comment here since last Toddard dropped in. (heh)
Ned| 10.12.09 @ 8:26PM
Fox should be honored. It is legitimate to ask if Fox is classified an opponent, then what category does CNN and all the other usual suspects belong?
This action by the White House will further strengthen and unify their opposition. It seems to me these Obama sycophants do not wish to fairly face any disagreement concerning their leader’s demands, and Fox is one of the few who offer a soapbox for this perceived antagonism. I hope this will add to the current administration’s undoing and bring about the change we can believe in.
David| 10.12.09 @ 11:03PM
Fox News can also be called, The Jesus Channel/ GOP TV/ The Glorious Official Republican Government News Network.
While Fox News has the highest ratings, it’s also the same group of people that make up just 20% of America’s electorate… the far right-wing of the GOP.
There will always be an audience for the far right and that’s Rupert Murdock’s Fox News demographic.
Rupert keeps them frothing at the mouth with manufactured fear and GOP talking-points, phony outrage.
Fox is also a right-wing echo chamber.. notice that when “The Wall Street Journal”, “The Weekly Standard” people are on Fox News there’s never disclosure that these people are all Rupert Murdock employees.
Imagine if MSNBC or CNN did this… I don’t know how Fox News gets way with constantly recycling Rupert Murdock’s employees (sockpuppets) from his various media properties.
There’s hardly a word on the “MSM” about Murdock’s world wide (far right-wing) media empire.
Murdock has a lot of influence, example: all of his various sockpuppets, Hannity, Beck, etc, and all of Murdock’s worldwide media holdings trash global warming, President Obama and anything else right-wing Rupert Murdock dislikes.
I think that press and especially individual journalists are deathly afraid of Rupert Murdock and what he can do to them professionally.
Rupert Murdock is the new William Randolph Hearst.
Another thing, Sarah Palin, who is a favorite among the Faux News/ Right-wing crowd is getting Rupert Murdock’s wingnut welfare.
Palin’s (Rupert Murdock’s ghostwriter) book publisher is HarperCollins… a wholly owned Rupert Murdock subsidiary, you ‘betcha.
Also, there should be an award given to the guy that writes the ominous, scary music for Fox News... he's obviously a full-time employee.
No seriously... whenever there's a special where Rupert Murdock wants to convince Americans that Saddam Hussein has WMD, or that Iran/North Korea is going to attack America tomorrow, or a Hannity or Beck segment where they want to scare their right-wing audience (even more) there's always that ominous music to go along with the story.
It's like a scary GOP music video.
Margie| 10.13.09 @ 12:55AM
I think Art Bell has a space ship he'd like to sell to you, kiddo. It's ready for take off... counting down.. 10... 9.... 8.... 7.... 6.... 5..................
Daisy| 10.13.09 @ 1:57AM
Liar troll. Studies prove that Fox's audience is by far the most diverse of all the networks. Conservatives, moderates and liberals all watch Fox.
Hurt don't it?
BTW, freak; Conservatives comprise 40% of the population--Liberals just 20%. Read it and weep.
Daisy| 10.13.09 @ 1:59AM
I'll tell you what's really scary; the spittle-flecked visage of Keith Doberman on PMSNBC. Good gosh almighty, what a bonehead!
Jeffrey Lord| 10.13.09 @ 9:03AM
David...
News flash. The Weekly Standard is not owned by Rupert Murdoch. It was sold.
Yosemeti Sam| 10.13.09 @ 12:19AM
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ....
Mommy, mommy - FOX is telling the truth about me; where's my wet-nurse?
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ....
Johe| 10.13.09 @ 3:16AM
Great News!
OBAMA
Related News:
laser marking system
Nathan| 10.13.09 @ 5:40AM
If you think about it, this is just a case of the other shoe dropping.
I mean, didn't those morons in the White House just recently make an open attack on Fox News? That's pretty much an open admission right there of alliance with the rest of the media, since the rest of the media is also attacking Fox.
Yeah, the left-stream media are all in the tank for their Messiah. Why should they pretend otherwise anymore? No one was buying what they were selling.
martin j smith| 10.13.09 @ 8:37AM
Fox news is to be congratulated for upsetting the white house and it should get a Nobel Prize for being the only TV media to buck the system. In addition it is also the TV station that actually has differing views or debate,scream at each other or whatever.
So to those who think Fox news only atttracts a small percentage of the far right --you are wrong. That is because some of us can see thru the BS of CNN,CNBC,PBS you name it. Really sprouting a Party line that sounds like the Comintern of the 1930s is easy to spot--for those of us who studied history.
Pingback| 10.16.09 @ 1:13AM
What is your feelings towards the goosestepping Media Mongrel Anita Dunn, Obama’s Med links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
links of london Rings| 10.21.09 @ 1:34AM
It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.