The Washington Times has
the scoop, with a hat tip to the National Right to Life
Committee. Yes, there are death panels. But they wear green
eyeshades, and they won't even know when they are causing deaths.
…The_Spectator philipaklein Philip Klein amspec American Spectator 111 Show more Shortened Links Linking to the spectator.org page http://bit.ly/CzjsL info 2 tweets Tweet The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Death Panels by Proxy spectator.org/blog/2009/09/25/death-panels-by-proxy – view page – cached The Washington Times has the scoop, with a hat tip to the National Right to Life Committee. Yes,…
Daisy| 9.25.09 @ 12:32PM
"Death Panels" is part of the vernacular now: Only fools
underestimate Palin.
Liberal Reader| 9.25.09 @ 9:44PM
Daisy --
At last you make a pretty good point. Anyone who thinks that
Palin can't effect the public debate is a fool. She's a fantastic
communicator and she's not dumb.
She did not come up with the phrase "death panels," a right wing
think tank did. However, she was able to USE it so that it
infected the public discourse and distracted people from the
actual issues.
Lest we be too carried away, however, it should be pointed out
yet again that there is no and has never been any death panels
proposed by Democrats or anyone else.
The fact that Palin was able to affect the debate with paranoid
nonsense is a testament to her ability -- and the incredible
foolishness and childishness of the electorate.
S.L. Toddard| 9.26.09 @ 2:07PM
"The fact that Palin was able to affect the debate with paranoid
nonsense is a testament to her ability -- and the incredible
foolishness and childishness of the electorate."
That she spout out the talking-points she's handed speaks to her
ability - to speak English. Otherwise it says far more about the
childishness and gullibility of the electorate, and about the
essence of their politics, which is entirely driven by emotions
and not reason.
No one who doesn't know Palin personally can speak definitively
on how intelligent she is, but given all the evidence available
she appears to be a substance-free airhead with no talent beyond
being able to speak English (and that not very well), being
telegenic and being able to project her you-betcha hominess.
Lisa| 9.28.09 @ 4:18AM
And she's gonna kick Obama's liberal butt, doofas!
Kills you, doesn't it, kiss-ass troll? Ha ha.
Liberal Reader| 9.25.09 @ 6:14PM
Death Panels by proxy?
You mean "private health insurance"?
Johnno| 9.25.09 @ 7:08PM
Death Panels by Barack ZerObama and his fellow fascist liberals,
Nazi Pelosi and Dirty Bird Harry.
Liberal Reader| 9.25.09 @ 9:24PM
Johnno --
You really are a jackass, aren't you?
Reread your post.
Is there ANYTHING about it that a seventh grader couldn't or
woudn't have written?
Grow the FUCK UP, man.
In order to govern itself, a free country needs citizens who can
be trusted to learn about the issues and make informed,
reasonable choices.
You're not carrying your weight. You're a free-loader.
S. L. Toddard| 9.25.09 @ 10:16PM
FUCK YOU, LibReader. TurdTroll.
S.L. Toddard| 9.26.09 @ 11:11AM
LR - that is (below), obviously, Nobama/Johnno posting in my
name.
S.L. Toddard| 9.26.09 @ 11:12AM
Sorry - I mean above.
Dixie Pixie| 9.25.09 @ 7:49PM
Funny, Did or did not, I hear Obama state that anyone who claims
“Death Panels” will exist under his plan is lying. I guess Obama
was lying, confused, delusional or simply stupid. Maybe a bit of
all. It is going to be a long time to the next election cycle.
Liberal Reader| 9.25.09 @ 10:43PM
That's what you people are: you are free-loaders, the
intellectual equivalents of welfare queens.
If you want to be taken seriously, you have to earn it. You
people aren't willing to earn it.
S. L. Toddard| 9.25.09 @ 10:48PM
The only Queen on this site is you, Mr. Swishy. Go the heck away.
S.L. Toddard| 9.26.09 @ 11:14AM
The above is also Nobama/Johnno posting in my name. He often
assumes my identity in a perverse, fantasy-fulfilling
role-playing game.
I hope you recognize, LR, that I do not argue in this juvenile,
name-calling fashion that Johnno/Nobama does.
Apologies.
Liberal Reader| 9.26.09 @ 12:10PM
How dare you speak to me in this coarse fashion, troll. Your
wimpy apology is not enough.
S.L. Toddard| 9.26.09 @ 2:08PM
There is no way this is really LR.
Liberal Reader| 9.28.09 @ 4:19AM
The smell of fine liberal whine. Quit feeling sorry for yourself,
loser.
Dixie Pixie| 9.26.09 @ 6:22PM
To: Liberal Reader
You are a Harvard Yard lawn jockey and yes, for you, that was a
complement. I will try one last time to bring enlightenment to
your mind. Obama is a world-class con artist. Obama has lied from
alpha to omega about Health Care Reform. Obama-Care is a scam and
a con job by Obama and the liberals to loot and pillage the
health care industry to replace the money not being skimmed out
of the failing Social Security and Medicaid / Medicare
systems.
End of enlightenment.
Now for anyone's amusement, here are the facts....
Roughly 70 years ago, FDR had a problem. He had created a whole
alphabet soup of governmental agencies to make as many people as
possible financially dependent on the benevolence of FDR. The
problem thus arose was how to pay his minions and suck-ups. He
came up with a Ponzi scheme where the public was forced to pay
into a retirement account and at the age of 65 they could with
the benevolence of the federal government draw from the Social
Security accounts. The financially horrid truth was most people
died at age 61 and so never would receive a penny. But for the
federal government the scheme produced a bountiful surplus of
money as there was a ratio of 20 pay-ins to 1 pay-out. Even
better for the federal government was a ever rising population
base which insured a increasing amount of money to be skimmed
off. Life was good for FDR and his successors as the federal
government controlled the scam from the pay-in rates and charges
to the pay-outs to the beneficiaries. To complete the scam
everyone but the political elite must be part of the scam by law.
Ponzi scams have a simple financial structure. Pay-ins minus
Pay-outs equals money skimmed. There lies the 3 fundamental flaws
of the scheme. (1st) Pay-outs must never exceed Pay-ins. (2nd)
The money skimmed off must never exceed the difference between
the Pay-outs and Pay-ins. (3rd) Finally for a ever increasing
money to be skimmed condition, there must be ever more numerous
suckers brought into the scam.
FDR thought with the Social Security scheme all three conditions
would never occur. It never occurred to him the US Federal
Government would violate all three conditions. It certainly never
occurred to him there was a fourth flaw in his scheme.
The fourth flaw was the worst flaw of all. It never occurred to
the economists of the day there was a difference in government
and private spending. There really is a difference in capital
investment and spending money on more bureaucrats. Certainly no
one knew or mentioned government income and spending was a
destroyer of monetary value. In short every dollar sent to
government was one dollar taken out of the private economy and
therefor destroyed. It was not surprising the high capital
requirement industries were first destroyed thus creating the
Rust Belt States. Now the middle and low capital requirement
going down the governmental drain. It never occurred to FDR he
was creating the conditions for economic destruction of the US
industry and therefor high value jobs and job income.
By wrecking the US industrial economy the Federal Government
violated the third Ponzi condition. The Federal Government
insured there would be a decreasing Ponzi Pay-in as a function of
time. As a function of time the monetary value of american jobs
decreased, decreasing the Social Security income per job over
time.
Also aborting babies insured there would be fewer people coming
into the Social Security system as a function of time. Consider
that the 60 million aborted children would have saved the Social
Security system when they reached productive age. As a result of
the Federal Government actions there was less people with lower
value jobs restricting income into the Ponzi scam as a function
of time.
By borrowing more money than the Federal Government takes in
violates the second Ponzi condition. By borrowing against the
Social Security income the Federal Government is taking more
money out of the scam than can be sustained. The net result is to
decrease the value of the currency used in the Ponzi scam.
Finally, Congress violated the third Ponzi condition by
increasing benefits to gain political support. Every one loves a
Santa Claus and Congress could not resist as it was free money to
them. Each "gift" seemed small considered one by one but over
time they added up.
As a result the Social Security and the related Medicaid /
Medicare Ponzi schemes are failing. Both will cease generating
money for the Federal Government in a few years. The gig is up
for the Federal Government and they are out of time. The Federal
Government needs a new income stream to replace what they soon
lose. Obama and the Liberals hope that Obama-Care will be that
replacement.
Obama-Care is the standard Ponzi format. Force everyone into it.
Maximize the income stream by requiring the maximum supportable
cost per person and minimizing the pay-out by restricting health
care to a minimum. Skim off the resulting difference in Pay-in
and Pay-out and spend the resulting money on the Federal
Bureaucracy and the public sector within. Time is running out for
the US Federal Government and they know it. The only rational
alternative solution is for the Federal Government to cut
spending somewhere from 25% to 60%. That will not happen as the
public sector unions will revolt at any spending cut.
End of long enlightenment.
Did it hurt Liberal Reader?
Liberal Reader| 9.26.09 @ 10:51PM
Dixie --
What you've written here is a hash of quasi-fascistic paranoia
typical of far right websites.
It's not interesting, enlightening, surprising, or even all that
threatening, since it represents the thinking of such a small and
-- thank God -- marginalized fringe of kooks that not even a
common farm duck would take seriously.
Get religion, woman, and reform.
Liberal Breeder| 9.27.09 @ 3:31AM
Reform now, Dixie--or I'll goose step all over you with my new
jackboots! I got them 'slightly used' from Axelrod.
Damn teabagger conservative, we'll show you!
Dixie Pixie| 9.27.09 @ 5:34PM
To: Liberal Reader, Liberal Breeder
Okay, I stand corrected, both of you combined do not have the
mental ability to be a Harvard Yard lawn jockey.
You proved it by not recognizing the subtle gradients of western
political thought as the difference between a German Socialist
and a Taft Isolationist ( Which I proudly am).
To summarize my main points, Obama-Care is being constructed as a
Ponzi scheme replacement for the failing Social Security Ponzi
scam by a world class “Shuck and Jive” con men. Due to liberal
greed and stupidity, the skimmed off money stream from Social
Security will fail in a few years. Obama-Care is the replacement
so the Federal Government can skim off as much money as possible.
Granny will be dammed.
So Liberal Reader and Liberal Breeder what is it like to be a
willing “mark” and fool.
Liberal Reader| 9.27.09 @ 6:12PM
Dixie,
Just a few things, and then really, I've had done with this
conversation.
1) What evidence do you have that health care legislation is a
Ponzi scheme? Or, are you just flinging that accusation around to
inflame people's passions?
2) What do you mean by "Shuck and Jive" con men. To whom are you
referring?
3) Who has "skimmed money" from Social Security?
4) Do you have ANY thing to offer except revanchist bile,
conspiracy theories, irrational claims, and rash, unsubstantiated
accusations?
Dixie Pixie| 9.27.09 @ 7:22PM
To: Liberal Reader
Yes, I too am weary of this word play with the deliberately
foolish.
(1)The Health Care reform structure defined by HR3200
(2)“Shuck an Jive” is a common South-Eastern description for a
type of con man which uses a exceedingly verbose flurry of
specious rhetoric to perpetrate a confidence scam. The term also
drives Northerners nuts.
(3)What??? Are you willing blind???? What do you think the decade
long “Lock-Box” debate was about. If you opened the Social
Security Trust Fund you will find a large mound of moth-eaten
IOU's from dead politicians.
(4)I suggest you wake up or the last thing you will see is a
Obama-Care doctor injecting you with a lethal cocktail of drugs.
Everyone gets old and given the political choice between spending
money on health-care or spending money on a politically favored
cause, guess who will get the lethal injection for costing too
much.
Wake Up before it is too late.
Liberal Reader| 9.28.09 @ 1:06AM
Dixie
You and Johnno should get together and go bowling. You'll wind up
on Jerry Springer someday with a litter of children suing the
government because they've been expelled for wearing swastika
t-shirts to school.
Honey, did you ever see the bumper sticker "Don't believe
everything you think"?
It's advice you ought to consider meditating on just a little.
Liberal Reader| 9.28.09 @ 3:45AM
Dixie; honest, baby--we'd be cool but I'm hunchbacked and
pockfaced; I never leave my stepmom's basement.
When I'm not pirouetting pretty in Emanuel's dainty ballerina
slippers, I fill the lonely hours goose-stepping around in
Axelrod's old jackboots: They gave me foot fungus.
No Liberal Breeder| 9.27.09 @ 8:59PM
Just a note, Dixie: Liberal Breeder is what Liberal Reader REALLY
thinks but can't say quite yet (Fascist Liberal power
consolidation is not finished, yet). I was just having a little
fun with the fascist troll.
Arrogant ass, ain't he?
S.L. Toddard| 9.27.09 @ 9:08PM
Oh, By the way Dixie, you're right about the corruption in Social
Security, MediCare and MediCaid: The losses are in the tens of
billions of dollars every year: 30--40%!!. Corruption is one of
the main reasons these programs are bankrupt--ObamaCare will be
FAR worse.
Every democrat thief will be paid off forever. Democrats are
disgusting crooks and criminals.
…Show more Shortened Links Linking to the spectator.org page http://bit.ly/CzjsL info 2 tweets Tweet The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Death Panels by Proxy … Original post: The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Death Panels by Proxy Tags: certificate, client-were, page-http, philip, philip-klein, proxy, the-spectator-org, windows-ultimate This entry was posted on Friday, September 25th, 2009 at 11:19 am and is…
Pingback| 9.25.09 @ 12:27PM
Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Death Panels by Proxy [ links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Daisy| 9.25.09 @ 12:32PM
"Death Panels" is part of the vernacular now: Only fools underestimate Palin.
Liberal Reader| 9.25.09 @ 9:44PM
Daisy --
At last you make a pretty good point. Anyone who thinks that Palin can't effect the public debate is a fool. She's a fantastic communicator and she's not dumb.
She did not come up with the phrase "death panels," a right wing think tank did. However, she was able to USE it so that it infected the public discourse and distracted people from the actual issues.
Lest we be too carried away, however, it should be pointed out yet again that there is no and has never been any death panels proposed by Democrats or anyone else.
The fact that Palin was able to affect the debate with paranoid nonsense is a testament to her ability -- and the incredible foolishness and childishness of the electorate.
S.L. Toddard| 9.26.09 @ 2:07PM
"The fact that Palin was able to affect the debate with paranoid nonsense is a testament to her ability -- and the incredible foolishness and childishness of the electorate."
That she spout out the talking-points she's handed speaks to her ability - to speak English. Otherwise it says far more about the childishness and gullibility of the electorate, and about the essence of their politics, which is entirely driven by emotions and not reason.
No one who doesn't know Palin personally can speak definitively on how intelligent she is, but given all the evidence available she appears to be a substance-free airhead with no talent beyond being able to speak English (and that not very well), being telegenic and being able to project her you-betcha hominess.
Lisa| 9.28.09 @ 4:18AM
And she's gonna kick Obama's liberal butt, doofas!
Kills you, doesn't it, kiss-ass troll? Ha ha.
Liberal Reader| 9.25.09 @ 6:14PM
Death Panels by proxy?
You mean "private health insurance"?
Johnno| 9.25.09 @ 7:08PM
Death Panels by Barack ZerObama and his fellow fascist liberals, Nazi Pelosi and Dirty Bird Harry.
Liberal Reader| 9.25.09 @ 9:24PM
Johnno --
You really are a jackass, aren't you?
Reread your post.
Is there ANYTHING about it that a seventh grader couldn't or woudn't have written?
Grow the FUCK UP, man.
In order to govern itself, a free country needs citizens who can be trusted to learn about the issues and make informed, reasonable choices.
You're not carrying your weight. You're a free-loader.
S. L. Toddard| 9.25.09 @ 10:16PM
FUCK YOU, LibReader. TurdTroll.
S.L. Toddard| 9.26.09 @ 11:11AM
LR - that is (below), obviously, Nobama/Johnno posting in my name.
S.L. Toddard| 9.26.09 @ 11:12AM
Sorry - I mean above.
Dixie Pixie| 9.25.09 @ 7:49PM
Funny, Did or did not, I hear Obama state that anyone who claims “Death Panels” will exist under his plan is lying. I guess Obama was lying, confused, delusional or simply stupid. Maybe a bit of all. It is going to be a long time to the next election cycle.
Liberal Reader| 9.25.09 @ 10:43PM
That's what you people are: you are free-loaders, the intellectual equivalents of welfare queens.
If you want to be taken seriously, you have to earn it. You people aren't willing to earn it.
S. L. Toddard| 9.25.09 @ 10:48PM
The only Queen on this site is you, Mr. Swishy. Go the heck away.
S.L. Toddard| 9.26.09 @ 11:14AM
The above is also Nobama/Johnno posting in my name. He often assumes my identity in a perverse, fantasy-fulfilling role-playing game.
I hope you recognize, LR, that I do not argue in this juvenile, name-calling fashion that Johnno/Nobama does.
Apologies.
Liberal Reader| 9.26.09 @ 12:10PM
How dare you speak to me in this coarse fashion, troll. Your wimpy apology is not enough.
S.L. Toddard| 9.26.09 @ 2:08PM
There is no way this is really LR.
Liberal Reader| 9.28.09 @ 4:19AM
The smell of fine liberal whine. Quit feeling sorry for yourself, loser.
Dixie Pixie| 9.26.09 @ 6:22PM
To: Liberal Reader
You are a Harvard Yard lawn jockey and yes, for you, that was a complement. I will try one last time to bring enlightenment to your mind. Obama is a world-class con artist. Obama has lied from alpha to omega about Health Care Reform. Obama-Care is a scam and a con job by Obama and the liberals to loot and pillage the health care industry to replace the money not being skimmed out of the failing Social Security and Medicaid / Medicare systems.
End of enlightenment.
Now for anyone's amusement, here are the facts....
Roughly 70 years ago, FDR had a problem. He had created a whole alphabet soup of governmental agencies to make as many people as possible financially dependent on the benevolence of FDR. The problem thus arose was how to pay his minions and suck-ups. He came up with a Ponzi scheme where the public was forced to pay into a retirement account and at the age of 65 they could with the benevolence of the federal government draw from the Social Security accounts. The financially horrid truth was most people died at age 61 and so never would receive a penny. But for the federal government the scheme produced a bountiful surplus of money as there was a ratio of 20 pay-ins to 1 pay-out. Even better for the federal government was a ever rising population base which insured a increasing amount of money to be skimmed off. Life was good for FDR and his successors as the federal government controlled the scam from the pay-in rates and charges to the pay-outs to the beneficiaries. To complete the scam everyone but the political elite must be part of the scam by law.
Ponzi scams have a simple financial structure. Pay-ins minus Pay-outs equals money skimmed. There lies the 3 fundamental flaws of the scheme. (1st) Pay-outs must never exceed Pay-ins. (2nd) The money skimmed off must never exceed the difference between the Pay-outs and Pay-ins. (3rd) Finally for a ever increasing money to be skimmed condition, there must be ever more numerous suckers brought into the scam.
FDR thought with the Social Security scheme all three conditions would never occur. It never occurred to him the US Federal Government would violate all three conditions. It certainly never occurred to him there was a fourth flaw in his scheme.
The fourth flaw was the worst flaw of all. It never occurred to the economists of the day there was a difference in government and private spending. There really is a difference in capital investment and spending money on more bureaucrats. Certainly no one knew or mentioned government income and spending was a destroyer of monetary value. In short every dollar sent to government was one dollar taken out of the private economy and therefor destroyed. It was not surprising the high capital requirement industries were first destroyed thus creating the Rust Belt States. Now the middle and low capital requirement going down the governmental drain. It never occurred to FDR he was creating the conditions for economic destruction of the US industry and therefor high value jobs and job income.
By wrecking the US industrial economy the Federal Government violated the third Ponzi condition. The Federal Government insured there would be a decreasing Ponzi Pay-in as a function of time. As a function of time the monetary value of american jobs decreased, decreasing the Social Security income per job over time.
Also aborting babies insured there would be fewer people coming into the Social Security system as a function of time. Consider that the 60 million aborted children would have saved the Social Security system when they reached productive age. As a result of the Federal Government actions there was less people with lower value jobs restricting income into the Ponzi scam as a function of time.
By borrowing more money than the Federal Government takes in violates the second Ponzi condition. By borrowing against the Social Security income the Federal Government is taking more money out of the scam than can be sustained. The net result is to decrease the value of the currency used in the Ponzi scam.
Finally, Congress violated the third Ponzi condition by increasing benefits to gain political support. Every one loves a Santa Claus and Congress could not resist as it was free money to them. Each "gift" seemed small considered one by one but over time they added up.
As a result the Social Security and the related Medicaid / Medicare Ponzi schemes are failing. Both will cease generating money for the Federal Government in a few years. The gig is up for the Federal Government and they are out of time. The Federal Government needs a new income stream to replace what they soon lose. Obama and the Liberals hope that Obama-Care will be that replacement.
Obama-Care is the standard Ponzi format. Force everyone into it. Maximize the income stream by requiring the maximum supportable cost per person and minimizing the pay-out by restricting health care to a minimum. Skim off the resulting difference in Pay-in and Pay-out and spend the resulting money on the Federal Bureaucracy and the public sector within. Time is running out for the US Federal Government and they know it. The only rational alternative solution is for the Federal Government to cut spending somewhere from 25% to 60%. That will not happen as the public sector unions will revolt at any spending cut.
End of long enlightenment.
Did it hurt Liberal Reader?
Liberal Reader| 9.26.09 @ 10:51PM
Dixie --
What you've written here is a hash of quasi-fascistic paranoia typical of far right websites.
It's not interesting, enlightening, surprising, or even all that threatening, since it represents the thinking of such a small and -- thank God -- marginalized fringe of kooks that not even a common farm duck would take seriously.
Get religion, woman, and reform.
Liberal Breeder| 9.27.09 @ 3:31AM
Reform now, Dixie--or I'll goose step all over you with my new jackboots! I got them 'slightly used' from Axelrod.
Damn teabagger conservative, we'll show you!
Dixie Pixie| 9.27.09 @ 5:34PM
To: Liberal Reader, Liberal Breeder
Okay, I stand corrected, both of you combined do not have the mental ability to be a Harvard Yard lawn jockey.
You proved it by not recognizing the subtle gradients of western political thought as the difference between a German Socialist and a Taft Isolationist ( Which I proudly am).
To summarize my main points, Obama-Care is being constructed as a Ponzi scheme replacement for the failing Social Security Ponzi scam by a world class “Shuck and Jive” con men. Due to liberal greed and stupidity, the skimmed off money stream from Social Security will fail in a few years. Obama-Care is the replacement so the Federal Government can skim off as much money as possible. Granny will be dammed.
So Liberal Reader and Liberal Breeder what is it like to be a willing “mark” and fool.
Liberal Reader| 9.27.09 @ 6:12PM
Dixie,
Just a few things, and then really, I've had done with this conversation.
1) What evidence do you have that health care legislation is a Ponzi scheme? Or, are you just flinging that accusation around to inflame people's passions?
2) What do you mean by "Shuck and Jive" con men. To whom are you referring?
3) Who has "skimmed money" from Social Security?
4) Do you have ANY thing to offer except revanchist bile, conspiracy theories, irrational claims, and rash, unsubstantiated accusations?
Dixie Pixie| 9.27.09 @ 7:22PM
To: Liberal Reader
Yes, I too am weary of this word play with the deliberately foolish.
(1)The Health Care reform structure defined by HR3200
(2)“Shuck an Jive” is a common South-Eastern description for a type of con man which uses a exceedingly verbose flurry of specious rhetoric to perpetrate a confidence scam. The term also drives Northerners nuts.
(3)What??? Are you willing blind???? What do you think the decade long “Lock-Box” debate was about. If you opened the Social Security Trust Fund you will find a large mound of moth-eaten IOU's from dead politicians.
(4)I suggest you wake up or the last thing you will see is a Obama-Care doctor injecting you with a lethal cocktail of drugs. Everyone gets old and given the political choice between spending money on health-care or spending money on a politically favored cause, guess who will get the lethal injection for costing too much.
Wake Up before it is too late.
Liberal Reader| 9.28.09 @ 1:06AM
Dixie
You and Johnno should get together and go bowling. You'll wind up on Jerry Springer someday with a litter of children suing the government because they've been expelled for wearing swastika t-shirts to school.
Honey, did you ever see the bumper sticker "Don't believe everything you think"?
It's advice you ought to consider meditating on just a little.
Liberal Reader| 9.28.09 @ 3:45AM
Dixie; honest, baby--we'd be cool but I'm hunchbacked and pockfaced; I never leave my stepmom's basement.
When I'm not pirouetting pretty in Emanuel's dainty ballerina slippers, I fill the lonely hours goose-stepping around in Axelrod's old jackboots: They gave me foot fungus.
No Liberal Breeder| 9.27.09 @ 8:59PM
Just a note, Dixie: Liberal Breeder is what Liberal Reader REALLY thinks but can't say quite yet (Fascist Liberal power consolidation is not finished, yet). I was just having a little fun with the fascist troll.
Arrogant ass, ain't he?
S.L. Toddard| 9.27.09 @ 9:08PM
Oh, By the way Dixie, you're right about the corruption in Social Security, MediCare and MediCaid: The losses are in the tens of billions of dollars every year: 30--40%!!. Corruption is one of the main reasons these programs are bankrupt--ObamaCare will be FAR worse.
Every democrat thief will be paid off forever. Democrats are disgusting crooks and criminals.
Pingback| 9.29.09 @ 12:50PM
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Death Panels by Proxy « I-arcade Blog links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
electgogo| 10.29.09 @ 11:29AM
The contents of article are wonderful!!!Great!
brand new discounting Laptop Batteries
brand new discounting Laptop cpu fans