The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Max Baucus health care proposal will reduce the deficit by $49 billion over 10 years. Peter Suderman notes that despite the CBO's many caveats (mainly involving the fact that all of the savings it calls for may never actually get implemented), it's still the best break proponents of health care legislation have gotten in months. I agree in the sense that Baucus has shown that it's possible to get a good score from the CBO on a health care bill, but the problem for Democrats is that Baucus achieved this score with a proposal that ditches the government plan, offers less generous subsidies than other Democratic bills, and imposes a tax on high-end health plans that unions passionately object to. It's a plan that may score well with the CBO, but that hasn't been able to pass muster with liberals.

View all comments (2) | Leave a comment

MarkJ| 9.16.09 @ 8:20PM

Seems to me the problems with Baucus' "savings" is that they'll simply be wiped out by the next round of bailouts, monetization of debt, Cap 'n' Tax, most any other pet Obamazoid pet project, and--most importantly--a totally unexpected natural or "man-made" catastrophe.

In other words, we'd get more "savings" from Max Baucus' plan by simply declaring it D.O.A. and going back to the drawing board.

Centrist| 9.23.09 @ 3:13PM

"(mainly involving the fact that all of the savings it calls for may never actually get implemented)"
Gee... we all know how good congress is at cutting the costs it says it will.... and saving money for that matter....
sort of like the "automatic" cuts that were supposed to take place since 2003 that both parties have overridden...
or the 'balanced budget' amendment that they just hold a vote to override because you kn0w its 'an emergency'
newt atleast had the guts to force balanced budgets by threat of gov't shutdown... cost him his job but its what got bill clinton so much praise

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/09/16/cbo-baucus-bill-would-reduce-d

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Sulllivan Silliness

Ross Kaminsky | 5:40PM

Meghan McCain Doesn't Get It

Jeffrey Lord | 1:36PM

The Paul Factor

W. James Antle, III | 1:29PM

Bain v. Solyndra

W. James Antle, III | 12:11PM

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

The White House Sieve

Jed Babbin | 5.29.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Osceola Who?

Reid Collins | 5.29.12

The Bain of Romney's Existence

W. James Antle | 5.29.12

ADVERTISEMENT