The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

If National Geographic is to be believed, global warming is helping hold off the next ice age:

Humans are putting the brakes on the next ice age, according to the most extensive study to date on Arctic climate change.

The Arctic is now warmer than it's been in the past 2,000 years-a trend that is reversing a natural cooling cycle dictated by a wobble in Earth's axis.

Previously, researchers had looked at Arctic temperature data that went back just 400 years. (See photos of how climate change is transforming the Arctic.)

That research showed a temperature spike in the 20th century, but it was unclear whether human-caused greenhouse gas emissions or natural variability was the culprit, noted study co-author Gifford Miller of the Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research at the University of Colorado, Boulder.

By looking even farther back in time, Miller and colleagues' newest study reveals that the 20th century's abrupt warming in fact interrupted millennia of steady cooling.

It's "pretty clear that the most reasonable explanation for that reversal is due to increasing greenhouse gases," Miller said.

The researchers' computer climate models dovetails with field data such as sediment cores and tree rings, which "really ... solidifies our understanding," he said.

Eventually Earth will slip again into the pattern of cyclical ice ages, Miller added, but it may be thousands of years before that happens.

Being hot sure beats freezing to death.  Perhaps we should be trying to further warm up the earth.

Spread the word:  global warming may be good!

View all comments (3) | Leave a comment

MikeN| 9.4.09 @ 5:37PM

Nice spin by National Geographic, but that study is bogus. Steve McIntyre at ClimateAudit.org has already pointed out several flaws. They even turn one of the proxies they use for their study upside-down to get a hockey stick shape.
Basically they averaged together things that look like hockey sticks to get -surprise- a hockey stick.
They don't bother with the things that don't look like hockey sticks. And they never bother proving that the things they are averaging are related to temperature, other than being correlated.

Jim O'Brien| 9.5.09 @ 5:03AM

Greenhouse gases are good. The most common one is water vapor. Without greenhouse gases the earth would be too cold. Further, the one that ignorant Socialists like Obama and Gore rant about most often is carbon dioxide (Cap & Trade), yet CO2 is only present in the atmosphere in trace amounts (about 380 parts per million). Two good books to read are "Unstoppable Global Warming" by Fred Singer & Dennis Avery, and "Climate Confusion" by Roy Spencer. (I guess most liberals only read trashy novels, if they read at all.)

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Doug Bandow

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/09/04/why-global-warming-may-be-good
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Middle-Aged Man Takes a Holiday

Christopher Orlet | 2.9.12

ADVERTISEMENT