The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Earlier this month I noted Jerry Coyne's New Republic review of Robert Wright's book The Evolution of God, mentioning at the time that an earlier, similar essay of Coyne's had provoked some interesting responses. Although it took a while, this one too has elicited what is really an evisceration from Jim Manzi. Manzi shows that Coyne, the scientist, has based his argument on a confused notion of randomness that in fact conflates several different meanings of the word random. Again, I think both the article and the response are well worth reading.

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Joseph Lawler

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/09/02/no-need-to-be-coyne-about-it
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Middle-Aged Man Takes a Holiday

Christopher Orlet | 2.9.12

ADVERTISEMENT