Dan McCarthy
argues that as the Republican Party more tightly embraces a
weak-tea platform with little popular support, the more it relies
on identity politics and liberal-bashing to turn out the base.
And while high-brow conservatives chastise Sarah Palin, Joe the
Plumber, and the birthers, the platform they advocate -- an
expanded (but family-friendly!) welfare state at home plus the
Great Society
exported to the Middle East -- is so unpopular that
Republicans have to cover it up with piles of red meat come
election time.
I made a different but related argument
when trying to explain why social conservatives are blamed for
the Republican losses of 2006 and 2008 when their issues played a
smaller role than in 2002 and 2004, when the GOP won. The GOP
tends to treat social conservatism as red-state, silent-majority
identity politics -- Real America! Drill baby, drill! Hockey
moms! -- rather than a coherent defense of life, the family, and
traditional values.