The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Dan McCarthy argues that as the Republican Party more tightly embraces a weak-tea platform with little popular support, the more it relies on identity politics and liberal-bashing to turn out the base. And while high-brow conservatives chastise Sarah Palin, Joe the Plumber, and the birthers, the platform they advocate -- an expanded (but family-friendly!) welfare state at home plus the Great Society exported to the Middle East -- is so unpopular that Republicans have to cover it up with piles of red meat come election time.

I made a different but related argument when trying to explain why social conservatives are blamed for the Republican losses of 2006 and 2008 when their issues played a smaller role than in 2002 and 2004, when the GOP won. The GOP tends to treat social conservatism as red-state, silent-majority identity politics -- Real America! Drill baby, drill! Hockey moms! -- rather than a coherent defense of life, the family, and traditional values.

About the Author

W. James Antle, III is associate editor of The American Spectator. You can follow him on Twitter at http://Twitter.com/Jimantle.

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/09/02/does-high-brow-conservatism-be

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT