The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

Why David Brooks Hearts Obama

It's all in this New Republic article. The article itself is interesting and though-provoking; Brooks's insights are not. It takes a strange and very selective reading of the evidence to conclude, as Brooks does, that President Obama "sees himself as a Burkean."

Comments

Spicy Joker| 8.31.09 @ 11:31AM

He's almost as loathsome and disgusting as David Frum.

Teflon93| 8.31.09 @ 11:39AM

This graf stuck out:

“David is a conservative who is motivated by a deep distrust of ideology,” former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson, a Brooks friend, says. “That is a strain of conservatism. It puts him in a position where he’s not taking views simply because they fit a party line.” Indeed, at Obama’s much-talked-about January dinner with conservative pundits--hosted by George Will and attended by CNBC’s Larry Kudlow, Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer, and Wall Street Journal editorial-page editor Paul Gigot, among others--the president greeted Brooks by asking, “What are you doing here?”

Indeed. Once you try in vain to unpack Gerson's statement, you realize that it is Brooks and Frum et al who are indeed toeing "the party line"---their loyalty---such as it is---is to the Republican Party, not to the conservative movement, which they neither understand nor support.

What are they doing here?

Robert Stacy McCain| 8.31.09 @ 12:51PM

Joe, I was dumbfounded by the David Brooks Perfect Pants-Crease Theory of Statesmanship.

It takes a particularly shallow mind to suppose that well-tailored clothing -- which anybody with money can buy -- signifies anything meaningful about the person in the suit.

Brooks exhibits the craven instincts of the socially insecure arriviste.

Real American| 8.31.09 @ 1:38PM

no one who voted for Obama could rightfully call themselves a conservative or a Republican w/o seriously recanting and apologizing. Brooks is such a loser.

BD57| 8.31.09 @ 1:40PM

Brooks comes off as extraordinarily shallow, with pretensions to being an intellectual.

Mary Louise| 8.31.09 @ 1:41PM

Back when Contentions was accepting comments I quoted Brooks and his take on Obama and Niebuhr. Brooks was relaying how impressed he was w/Obama’s familiarity and fondness for Niebuhr, made manifest by Obama’s confession that power and movement must proceed w/humilty. Leave aside the fact that he's not conducted himself with humility. That his idea of it is to confess the sins of his Nation before the world: he looks good, we look bad, and that's the point. No leader, worthy of the title, conducts himself as Obama has conducted himself. And he's en route toward spectacular failure.

But back to Contentions. I quoted Gibbon and The Decline and Fall and remarked that contrary to Obama’s take being anything fresh and new, "his take" had been known and expressed for thousands of years before. A commenter responded that Brooks was the "cheapest of cheap dates." And I think Joe was absolutely right.

Even with a rudimentary understanding of Burke, I think it's pretty easy to tell that he would not support what Obama stands for and what he’s trying to accomplish. I don't believe either he or Kirk would cotton to well to the thoughtless egalitarianism that is at the core of his philosophy.

From Burke's Reflections, page 66:

***But now all is to be changed. All the pleasing illusions which made power gentle and obedience liberal, which harmonized the different shades of life, and which, by a bland assimilation, incorporated into politics the sentiments which beautify and soften private society, are to be dissolved by this new conquering empire of light and reason. All the decent drapery of life is to be rudely torn off. All the superadded ideas furnished from the wardrobe of a moral imagination, which the heart owns, and the understanding ratifies as necessary to cover our naked, shivering nature, and to raise it to dignity in our own estimate, are to be exploded as ridiculous, absurd and antiquated fashion.***

For Brooks to deny the possibility of a Divine Spark is the mark of an inferior intellectual capacity and/or imagination. Is he that dead from the neck up and the waist down?

I think, like Obama, he doesn’t really understand America and by extension, Americans. Perhaps he even dislikes both, more than a little.

And for the United States to have a president who covers up the Monogram of the Name of Jesus is a sign of our self-doubt and maybe even our self-loathing. To use The Sermon On The Mount so cavalierly, pretending that his 2nd Personhood isn’t involved, is very difficult for me to put an adjective to.

If Brooks can't see that Obama is a very determined ideologue then he's either not really that smart or not that honest.

Pingback| 8.31.09 @ 2:32PM

The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Why David Brooks Hearts Obama links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…are not. It takes a strange and very selective reading of the evidence to conclude, as Brooks does, that President Obama “sees himself as a Burkean.” … Read the whole story here: Joseph Lawler aggregated by rssfever Twitter Poster plugin : Latest Baby names Comments are closed. Browse Posts By Category Choose a category below to browse and subscribe to specific content. hot trends Subscribe…

Bo Darville| 8.31.09 @ 5:22PM

Good gravy, that was tough to read, especially the part about the pants crease. Brooks is such an annoying pseudo-intellectual. By the way, when exactly did McCain return to "the loyal Republican fold?"

Pingback| 8.31.09 @ 5:24PM

The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Why David Brooks Hearts Obama : PlanetTalk.net links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…strange and very selective reading of the evidence to conclude, as Brooks does, that President Obama “sees himself as a Burkean.” … Read the original here: The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Why David Brooks Hearts Obama Tags: brooks, conservative, david, facebook, joseph-lawler, lax-on-libya, new-articles, obama, philosophy, Politics, robert-stacy, stumbleupon Comments Tell us what you're…

Deborah D| 9.1.09 @ 4:30AM

Brooks is just a "useful idiot" as far as the Obama administration is concerned. That he can't see that is obvious from the TNR article. That he's so thrilled that Obama has all of these graduates of ivy league schools surrounding him is a bit absurd...doesn't he remember Buckley's preference of the first 600 names in the phone book to the faculty of Harvard?

These people who live in their heads instead of in the real world really don't know the American people, and what they know of them, they don't like. That's why the capital of the United States should move to the middle of the country. That way folks like Brooks and folks making the laws would actually have to be surrounded by the real America instead of trapped in the NYC-DC bubble. They could really learn a lot from the American people.

Mr. Brooks, you need to get out more.

louis tully| 9.1.09 @ 9:02AM

Pseudo-intellectual fraud. If this is a man of ideas, then the market for ideas is in even worse shape than the market for vacation condos.

uggboots| 9.2.09 @ 3:31AM

ugg boots sale
Classic Short Ugg Boots

uggboots| 9.2.09 @ 3:32AM

ugg bailey button boots
Classic Tall Ugg Boots

NFL jerseys| 9.4.09 @ 11:35PM

It is a wonderful article,I like it!Welcome to read following news: NFL jerseys,Photoshop CS2,ghd Hair Straightener,Adobe Photoshop CS4,cheap uggs.

Pingback| 10.16.09 @ 3:06AM

Baby names search - Search for deborah links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…At Home & Getting Effective Relief From Labor Pains. Blogs related to Baby names search - Search for deborah Alan Seidens Information Technology " Brand your site with a ... The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Why David Brooks Hearts ... Bookmark with: Delicious Digg reddit Facebook StumbleUpon Suggested Products Put an end to all the Frustration, Stress and Annoyance of family members telling you how to get…

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

In Sum, IPCC Discredited

Paul Chesser

* * * *

That Dangerous Radical . . . Marvin Olasky?

Robert Stacy McCain

* * * *

Forget the Committees

Greg Scandlen

* * * *

Reid Disses David Broder

Philip Klein

* * * *

Moment of Truth

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

No Sales Days in the Afghan War

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Bureaucrats With Badges

Mark Hyman

* * * *

Obama in Wonderland

Ken Blackwell

* * * *

A Writer Speaks

William Tucker

* * * *

What Has Changed?

Robert P. Kirchhoefer

* * * *

High Stakes

Manon McKinnon

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT