Apparently Obama and his accomplices decided to distract their
liberal base from the fiery Hindenburg crash of
socialized medicine, by offering them a relaxing cruise on the
Titanic of leftist foreign policy. . . .
A weary public allowed itself to be badgered into electing the
first black president, after they ran out of patience waiting
for John McCain to explain why they shouldn't. Normal people
don't define their relationship with the government by taking
pleasure in the humiliation of political figures they dislike.
We're six months past the point where American voters can be
kept quiet by suffocating them with the pillow of Bush hatred.
OK, so far, so good. One of Bill Clinton's most
insightful mantras was that successful politics is always
forward-looking. A politics that spends its time
arguing over the past is, by definition, a losing proposition. So
the attempt of the Obama administration and its allies to score
points by discrediting post-9/11 counterterrorism policy is a
guaranteed loser, politically.
However, having made that valid point, Doctor Zero then adds:
We're about a month past the point where anyone capable of
independent thought believes Obama is a better president than
Bush was.
This is a bad argument, setting up an unnecessary comparison
which does nothing to bolster the opposition to Obama.
Furthermore, one can easily argue that George W. Bush was a very
bad president and that one of the worst aspects of his presidency
was that Bush confused people about the meaning of "conservatism"
in a way that damaged the Republican Party and made possible
Obama's election.
In this regard, I am fond of quoting our publisher, Al Regnery,
who told me last year in an interview:
"You look back in the earlier times, there were no
opportunities, so there were no opportunists," Regnery says,
noting how liberals heaped abusive epithets on Buckley,
Goldwater, and other early conservative leaders. "Later on, you
have all these people who figure it's probably a pretty good
political thing to do. And so they start talking about being
conservative when they're running [for office], but they really
aren't. So when they get to Congress or wherever they go,
they're pretty easily dissuaded."
Insofar as the Obama administration is a political failure, that
failure will damage the Democratic Party and the progressive
cause with which Democrats are identified. Whatever harm to the
national interest is inflicted by that failure, it is a harm for
which Obama's opponents cannot be blamed.
If we believe that the success of conservatism is synonymous with
the good of the nation -- as every conservative
certainly ought to believe -- then the damage to the
reputation of conservatism for which the Bush administration was
responsible is, ultimately, more harmful than whatever short-term
damage to the nation Obama's (hopefully brief) misrule may cause.
We ought not engage in a backward-looking politics, but we
should study and benefit from the lessons of failures
past. It must be recognized the extent to which the
Bush administration was a failure, or we risk further damage from
future repetitions.
I saw that somehow I had accidentally created two posts, but
don't have the level of admin authorization necessary to delete a
post. So I guess the admin deleted the wrong thread.
Although, considering some of the crazy moonbat troll commenters
we get around here, maybe . . . well, it wasn't me who did the
deleting, so I'll leave it to kismet.
Point well taken, Mr. McCain -- and today we have a fake
conservative (John McCain) making nice-nice with a health care
compromise...heaven help us. Now that Ted Kennedy died -- I'm
sure Congress will pass something in his honor.
No more fake conservatives.
TONY| 8.26.09 @ 6:36AM
re: Deborah D; "No more fake conservatives."
This is where I see a possible use for Gov. Palin's talents.
"Clean out the stables". Cull the herd. Put her in charge of
indentifying the conservatives and the non-conservatives in the
Repub. party and deny access to the "Nons". Do not let them even
call themselves Republicans; threaten lawsuit if they DO.
Make the "R" brand really mean something by flushing out the
RINO's.
I think Sarah could handle this very nicely.
We'd end up with fewer Republicans, but better Republicans.
For a while.
martin j smith| 8.26.09 @ 8:13AM
In a way Obama is a logical extention tion of Bush's policies--if
logic is the right word. Bush's floundering in his last years on
the War on terror,his
stand on immigration "reform" and his failure to stand up to his
critics and his excessive spending
which many Republicans emulated gave what we have-a mess.
Tim| 8.26.09 @ 9:09AM
Don't you think that it is a bit premature to call the Obama
Presidency a failure? Look at the facts:
1. The economy: not completely wrecked-yet.
2. The CIA no one in prsion- yet.
3. The budget- not totally bankrupt, in the sense that even if
our Chinese bankers stop loaning we can still print greenbacks
till we run out of trees- and face it we got lots of
trees...
4. The War on Terror- only losing, not lost.
5. Automotive bailouts: how can you call a $40,000 electric car a
failure?
6. Healthcare: Obama sent a powerful signal this week by going up
to Massachusetts and personally pulling Teddy's plug.
louis tully| 8.26.09 @ 9:20AM
Other Mac, you seem in this post to underestimate the "short term
damage" (?) that Obama has already done to the country and
therefore to conservatives.
However, I am in full agreement with your main point. Obama's
failure does not prove that Bush was not a failure. I cringe when
I read the 'I miss George Bush' posts that always pop up in
Comments on blogposts concerning one or another of Obama's
disasters. This argument--Obama bad, therefore Bush good--is a
non sequitor and also is politically tone deaf.
Conservatives need to cut their ties once and for all with 'W'.
(This may be tough for conservatives to do when Eric "the Red"
Holder begins his CIA show trials, which of course is why Holder
will proceed.)
Yosemeti Sam| 8.26.09 @ 9:20AM
Shucks - in honor of TK, senator McGoo can
to the Specter. Or is it the Spectre.
nohype| 8.26.09 @ 3:46PM
People may find many good things to say about Bush and his
presidency, but the fact that it paved the way for Obama
outweighs them all.
Okpulot Taha| 8.26.09 @ 3:55PM
Robert Stacy McCain writes, in part, "...more harmful than
whatever short-term damage to the nation Obama's (hopefully
brief) misrule may cause."
This is problematic from my personal viewpoint which is viewing
almost all "things" in terms of money. Most of us are aware money
is what makes our world spin round and round.
Inflation is just beginning to set in. Some of this is good such
as the real estate market beginning to recover; higher sales and
higher prices. However, federal printing of money will lead to
higher interest rates across the board which will squash big
ticket purchases. Additionally, lending sources for the feds are
being depleted, America's credit rating is quickly falling to
junk bond status and our "enemies" are eyeballing ways to cause
havoc with our economic recovery efforts.
What I see coming in the near future is Jimmy Carter style double
digit inflation and double digit interest rates. Avoiding a long
lecture on economics this will simply place cash out of the reach
of consumers and the feds; too expensive to borrow money for big
ticket items.
Those of you old enough I am sure you remember buying Jimmy
Carter CD accounts paying 12% interest over only one year. Our
family make good money off those. Other families less fortunate
did not do so well.
Expensive borrowing will skyrocket both our debt and costs of
Obama's deficit spending. I believe this ten year deficit
projection is about half of what will really be, if, a big if, we
continue on our present economic course set by Obama.
This "short-term" damage I am sure will become long term damage
through suppressing our economic recovery and through suppressing
ability of consumers to credit fund items like cars and homes.
Another factor is small to medium size businesses will pay higher
interest rates on monies needed for salaries and capital venture
thus further suppressing business and jobs.
Those notions and numerous other detrimental factors will prolong
our economic slump, diminish job creation, create a higher strain
on states and feds through "safety net" spending such as
unemployment benefits and welfare.
Personally, I see entitlement safety net spending doubling over
the next two to six years in many different ways, too many ways
to discuss here in a blog.
All of this, I believe, will cause money to be harder to come by,
continue job losses, deplete funds for unemployment assistance,
suppress new business and certainly double or more our national
debt and deficit spending.
These events will span a decade and more, long after Obama is
voted out of office.
Those are "long term" damages being created today through Obama's
economic policies; he is setting into motion events which will
snowball over a number of years.
Okpulot Taha
Choctaw Nation
Puma Politics
Okpulot Taha| 8.26.09 @ 4:06PM
Having finished my long winded rant, this economic aspect ties
directly into Robert McCain's "political failure" notion.
Obama is flat broke. There is no chance Obama can effect any of
his left liberal socialist policies as promised during last
year's campaigns.
Americans are all "wee-weed" up over our debt and deficit
spending. An inherent knee jerk reaction will be to vote
democrats out of office in both 2010 and 2012. This will place
conservatives back in charge of America.
Challenge here is for us to elect true conservatives rather than
another bunch of RINO types such as George Bush and John McCain.
2010 and 2012 will afford good opportunity to dispense with left
liberals and RINO types but only if Americans vote smart. I am
skeptical Americans have an ability to vote smart.
Okpulot Taha
Choctaw Nation
Puma Politics
Missy| 8.26.09 @ 7:18PM
I don't know, nohype--I'm still pretty stoked that we haven't
been hit by terrorists the last 8 years. Guess you forgot about
that, huh?
I will always be most grateful to George W Bush for his
courageous and stalwart defense of our country. God bless W.
…them with the pillow of Bush hatred. We’re about a month past the point where anyone capable of independent thought believes Obama is a better president than Bush was. In response, The Other McCain commented on the American Spectator blog: This is a bad argument, setting up an unnecessary comparison which does nothing to bolster the opposition to Obama. Furthermore, one can easily argue that George W. Bush was…
Ultimately this is about so much more than whether garlic pills,
glucosamine, multivitamins or any other natural health supplements
will be available to us freely. What it comes down to is case
scenarios like this: say I or anyone of us get cancer and want to
pursue natural therapy not chemo, or radiation or any synthetic
drug treatments, which normally destroy the human body more than
the cancer itself, then I should have freedom of choice and freely
available natural therapy just like modern t
Trackback| 12.30.09 @ 11:23PM
ma credit repair, on ma credit repair, links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
…them with the pillow of Bush hatred. We’re about a month past the point where anyone capable of independent thought believes Obama is a better president than Bush was. In response, The Other McCain commented on the American Spectator blog: This is a bad argument, setting up an unnecessary comparison which does nothing to bolster the opposition to Obama. Furthermore, one can easily argue that George W. Bush was…
High quality Cisco, HP, IBM, Oracle and other Certification exmas
training materials are provided here at Pass4sure Pass4sure helps
you on your way to your certifications,Click 640-553 to get more
information!
Nobama| 8.26.09 @ 12:45AM
Well, that was a smooth move: You deleted the blog that had comments.
Robert Stacy McCain| 8.26.09 @ 1:25AM
Really? There were comments on the other one?
I saw that somehow I had accidentally created two posts, but don't have the level of admin authorization necessary to delete a post. So I guess the admin deleted the wrong thread.
Although, considering some of the crazy moonbat troll commenters we get around here, maybe . . . well, it wasn't me who did the deleting, so I'll leave it to kismet.
Deborah D| 8.26.09 @ 5:10AM
Point well taken, Mr. McCain -- and today we have a fake conservative (John McCain) making nice-nice with a health care compromise...heaven help us. Now that Ted Kennedy died -- I'm sure Congress will pass something in his honor.
No more fake conservatives.
TONY| 8.26.09 @ 6:36AM
re: Deborah D; "No more fake conservatives."
This is where I see a possible use for Gov. Palin's talents. "Clean out the stables". Cull the herd. Put her in charge of indentifying the conservatives and the non-conservatives in the Repub. party and deny access to the "Nons". Do not let them even call themselves Republicans; threaten lawsuit if they DO.
Make the "R" brand really mean something by flushing out the RINO's.
I think Sarah could handle this very nicely.
We'd end up with fewer Republicans, but better Republicans.
For a while.
martin j smith| 8.26.09 @ 8:13AM
In a way Obama is a logical extention tion of Bush's policies--if logic is the right word. Bush's floundering in his last years on the War on terror,his
stand on immigration "reform" and his failure to stand up to his critics and his excessive spending
which many Republicans emulated gave what we have-a mess.
Tim| 8.26.09 @ 9:09AM
Don't you think that it is a bit premature to call the Obama Presidency a failure? Look at the facts:
1. The economy: not completely wrecked-yet.
2. The CIA no one in prsion- yet.
3. The budget- not totally bankrupt, in the sense that even if our Chinese bankers stop loaning we can still print greenbacks till we run out of trees- and face it we got lots of trees...
4. The War on Terror- only losing, not lost.
5. Automotive bailouts: how can you call a $40,000 electric car a failure?
6. Healthcare: Obama sent a powerful signal this week by going up to Massachusetts and personally pulling Teddy's plug.
louis tully| 8.26.09 @ 9:20AM
Other Mac, you seem in this post to underestimate the "short term damage" (?) that Obama has already done to the country and therefore to conservatives.
However, I am in full agreement with your main point. Obama's failure does not prove that Bush was not a failure. I cringe when I read the 'I miss George Bush' posts that always pop up in Comments on blogposts concerning one or another of Obama's disasters. This argument--Obama bad, therefore Bush good--is a non sequitor and also is politically tone deaf.
Conservatives need to cut their ties once and for all with 'W'. (This may be tough for conservatives to do when Eric "the Red" Holder begins his CIA show trials, which of course is why Holder will proceed.)
Yosemeti Sam| 8.26.09 @ 9:20AM
Shucks - in honor of TK, senator McGoo can
to the Specter. Or is it the Spectre.
nohype| 8.26.09 @ 3:46PM
People may find many good things to say about Bush and his presidency, but the fact that it paved the way for Obama outweighs them all.
Okpulot Taha| 8.26.09 @ 3:55PM
Robert Stacy McCain writes, in part, "...more harmful than whatever short-term damage to the nation Obama's (hopefully brief) misrule may cause."
This is problematic from my personal viewpoint which is viewing almost all "things" in terms of money. Most of us are aware money is what makes our world spin round and round.
Inflation is just beginning to set in. Some of this is good such as the real estate market beginning to recover; higher sales and higher prices. However, federal printing of money will lead to higher interest rates across the board which will squash big ticket purchases. Additionally, lending sources for the feds are being depleted, America's credit rating is quickly falling to junk bond status and our "enemies" are eyeballing ways to cause havoc with our economic recovery efforts.
What I see coming in the near future is Jimmy Carter style double digit inflation and double digit interest rates. Avoiding a long lecture on economics this will simply place cash out of the reach of consumers and the feds; too expensive to borrow money for big ticket items.
Those of you old enough I am sure you remember buying Jimmy Carter CD accounts paying 12% interest over only one year. Our family make good money off those. Other families less fortunate did not do so well.
Expensive borrowing will skyrocket both our debt and costs of Obama's deficit spending. I believe this ten year deficit projection is about half of what will really be, if, a big if, we continue on our present economic course set by Obama.
This "short-term" damage I am sure will become long term damage through suppressing our economic recovery and through suppressing ability of consumers to credit fund items like cars and homes. Another factor is small to medium size businesses will pay higher interest rates on monies needed for salaries and capital venture thus further suppressing business and jobs.
Those notions and numerous other detrimental factors will prolong our economic slump, diminish job creation, create a higher strain on states and feds through "safety net" spending such as unemployment benefits and welfare.
Personally, I see entitlement safety net spending doubling over the next two to six years in many different ways, too many ways to discuss here in a blog.
All of this, I believe, will cause money to be harder to come by, continue job losses, deplete funds for unemployment assistance, suppress new business and certainly double or more our national debt and deficit spending.
These events will span a decade and more, long after Obama is voted out of office.
Those are "long term" damages being created today through Obama's economic policies; he is setting into motion events which will snowball over a number of years.
Okpulot Taha
Choctaw Nation
Puma Politics
Okpulot Taha| 8.26.09 @ 4:06PM
Having finished my long winded rant, this economic aspect ties directly into Robert McCain's "political failure" notion.
Obama is flat broke. There is no chance Obama can effect any of his left liberal socialist policies as promised during last year's campaigns.
Americans are all "wee-weed" up over our debt and deficit spending. An inherent knee jerk reaction will be to vote democrats out of office in both 2010 and 2012. This will place conservatives back in charge of America.
Challenge here is for us to elect true conservatives rather than another bunch of RINO types such as George Bush and John McCain.
2010 and 2012 will afford good opportunity to dispense with left liberals and RINO types but only if Americans vote smart. I am skeptical Americans have an ability to vote smart.
Okpulot Taha
Choctaw Nation
Puma Politics
Missy| 8.26.09 @ 7:18PM
I don't know, nohype--I'm still pretty stoked that we haven't been hit by terrorists the last 8 years. Guess you forgot about that, huh?
I will always be most grateful to George W Bush for his courageous and stalwart defense of our country. God bless W.
Pingback| 8.27.09 @ 6:36PM
The Greenroom » Forum Archive » Avenger of the Bones links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Trackback| 9.19.09 @ 1:47AM
PulseMed Alternative Medicine, Acupuncture, and More Niche Articles, on PulseMed Alternative Medicine, Acupuncture, and More Niche Articles, links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Trackback| 12.30.09 @ 11:23PM
ma credit repair, on ma credit repair, links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.27.10 @ 9:13PM
Avenger of the Bones « Doctor Zero links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
640-553| 4.25.10 @ 10:07PM
High quality Cisco, HP, IBM, Oracle and other Certification exmas training materials are provided here at Pass4sure Pass4sure helps you on your way to your certifications,Click 640-553 to get more information!