As Congress heads toward its August recess, Washington is questioning whether the Democrat Congress and President Obama will be able to pass a healthcare bill this year. Most of the attention thus far has focused on the hundreds of billions in new taxes, the control board the government will set up, the escalting costs of the plans, etc.
But the most interesting pushback, at least for me, is from many quarters of the Catholic Church.
Raymond Arroyo over at EWTN recently posted a very helpful summary of what the Church's major objections would be to Obamacare as it is coming together. They include:
Any one of these three would be enough to spook most faithful Catholics. All three of them result in a total deal-breaker.
The normally-liberal USCCB (whose staff is dominated by Christian Democrat-like socialists) would ordinarily be expected to support government medicine. After all, they have been full-throatedly behind things like S-CHIP expansion and other government spending. But they are sending out VERY strong signals of concern on this one.
Bishop William Murphy of Rockville Center (NY), who heads up the USCCB division working on the healthcare issue had this to say in a recent letter:
On respecting life and dignity, he said, "No health care reform plan should compel us or others to pay for the destruction of human life, whether through government funding or mandatory coverage of abortion. Any such action would be morally wrong."
After citing protections from public funding of abortion in U.S. law, Bishop Murphy added, "Health care reform cannot be a vehicle for abandoning this consensus which respects freedom of conscience and honors our best American traditions. Any legislation should reflect longstanding and widely supported current policies on abortion funding, mandates and conscience protections because they represent sound morality, wise policy and political reality."
Getting to 218 in the House with the opposition of the Catholic bishops would be very problematic for Nancy Pelosi. Recently, 19 House Democrats signed a letter to Speaker Pelosi opposing abortion funding in any health care legislation (Democrats for Life even got in on the action on Arroyo's EWTN show). The Blue Dogs have concerns about cost. Combine all this with the House Republicans (likely to be unanimous in their opposition), and you have a headcount problem for the Democrats.
At the same time, it's hard to imagine a comprehensive healthcare reform bill passing out of the House of Representatives that doesn't genuflect at the altar of the culture of death. Just another reason why this issue is going nowhere as we enter the dog days of the August recess.
Dan| 7.29.09 @ 1:39AM
Underlying the whole idea of bringing seniors in to talk to them about "end of life choices," is the notion that people are less important than budgetary concerns in Washington.
The whole scheme privileges budgetary issues over each individual person, and it's the person, not the budget, which is made "in the image and the likeness." Thus quite apart from the matter of the federal funding of abortions, and quite apart from forcing Catholic hospitals to provide abortions for those desirious of procuring one, the entire idea of a quasi euthanizing process within the overall scheme HAS to warred against.
There's simply no way any observing Roman Catholic can possibly go along with the idea of dragging seniors into one-on-ones where they get browbeaten into something very close to suicide. It's mortally sinful.
We've no choice but to oppose this. This whole scheme, pushed by this nightmarish administration, is positively creepy.
ann| 7.29.09 @ 12:21PM
Catholics should oppose any federal health care program on the basis of the Principle of Subsidiarity which holds that the smallest social unit capable of handling an issue should be left to do so. The Feds are too big and far removed, they get in the way of the Dr. patient relationship.
The Church should support more local reforms.
The problem with modern medicine is HMOs. They are quite different from an ordinary insurance companies. Remember they are MANAGED CARE entities. They say what doctor we can see, what hoops we have to go through to see a doctor or obtain treatment or medicines. They require pre-authorizations and they restrict the use of certain medicines and procedures. Most importantly, they bog the system with delays which hurt patients.
HMO horror stories are many. If you don't like HMOs, you will not like Federal Government managed care even more.
We need to consider and push for alternatives
BigEdsBlog| 7.29.09 @ 1:16PM
Health Care for Dummies
I might be willing to really look into supporting the Healthcare bill if two things happen.
Check out my take, and stick around for more good content.
http://libertarianhumor.com/2009/07/29/health-care-simple/
Anne Perella| 7.29.09 @ 1:55PM
The Obama health plan is immoral and totally agenst humanity. Health care is for all I agree but not the Obama Plan that's suicide and infanticide.
Anne Perella
hellen| 9.3.09 @ 11:55PM
cross-section is filled with large power leveling and small, oval-shaped pores cheap wow power leveling