Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick is in a state of free fall,
according to the latest
polling (pdf) from the University of New Hampshire for the
Boston Globe. Fully 52 percent of voters view him
unfavorably while 36 percent view him favorably. Consider that
Patrick won the 2006 gubernatorial election with 56 percent of
the vote to Republican Kerry Healey's 35 percent.
Every demographic group in the state except Democrats, voters
under age 35, and Western Massachusetts residents disapprove of
Patrick. Only 16 percent of independents, now a plurality of
voters, approve of his performance in office; 68 percent
disapprove. Despite being the commonwealth's first black
governor, African-Americans disapprove of Patrick by a 52 percent
to 44 percent margin.
Those are the kinds of numbers that sink Democrats even in
Massachusetts, and Patrick trails both Republican candidates for
governor (though Christy Mihos' lead is within the margin of
error). This is true even though over 60 percent of voters don't
know enough to have an opinion of Harvard Pilgrim CEO Charlie
Baker, the candidate with the strongest lead over Patrick.
Patrick's campaign had a lot in common with Barack Obama's: the
"Together We Can" theme, a post-partisan and post-racial appeal,
even some of the same advisers. But even in one of the most
liberal and Democratic states in the country, it has not survived
the test of reality. And Patrick brought significantly more
experience running things in government and the private sector
than Obama.
As I reported
earlier, however, a possible gubernatorial run by
Democrat-turned-independent treasurer Tim Cahill keeps hope alive
for Patrick. The poll shows them tied at the low 30s with the
Republicans near the low 20s. (Patrick is also banking on an
economic turnaround.) Republicans are counting on the usual
Massachusetts trend of the third party candidate's support
melting away by Election Day, but if Cahill is seen as the more
viable anti-Patrick candidate Republicans may be the third party.