The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Genocide Museums

AmSpec contributor Doug Bandow mentions today the blogs I’ve posted here recently about the trial of Khmer Rouge jailer Kaing Guek Eav, who ran the Phnom Penh torture chamber that was S-21, or Tuol Sleng. Doug recounts his own visit a few years ago to the prison, and his descriptions accurately capture the horror and despair that Tuol Sleng — now a museum — conveys.

AmSpec contributor Doug Bandow mentions today the blogs I’ve posted here recently about the trial of Khmer Rouge jailer Kaing Guek Eav, who ran the Phnom Penh torture chamber that was S-21, or Tuol Sleng. Doug recounts his own visit a few years ago to the prison, and his descriptions accurately capture the horror and despair that Tuol Sleng — now a museum — conveys. I’ve been twice in the last two years and you can easily imagine what the place was like in the late 1970s: the gritty linoleum floors; the haphazard, quick-bricked cells; the crumbled walls; and of course the black-and-white photos of the victims.

In contrast, yesterday I happened to be in the Washington area for a brief family visit and decided to visit DC with my children for the day. Our first target was the Jefferson Memorial and on the way we passed the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, so we decided to take a brief stroll through.

I am fairly new to the study of the genocide issue so I am in no position to make value comparisons between the worth of one museum over another. Both have significant contributions to make to the education of society and both should burden visitors with how and why questions, and with puzzlement that such evil could exist.

But as for effectiveness in placing you at the scene of the crimes, there is no comparison. Tuol Sleng, as minimal and as undeveloped as you could imagine such a museum to be, overwhelms you. I imagine the experience is similar to what you would feel visiting Auschwitz, untainted. In contrast the U.S. Holocaust Museum, overflowing with facts and displays, and about as professional and slick as you can imagine, only conveys information. It’s a modern building with modern interactive techniques in spiffy displays which clue you in, but place you far away from the events it covers.

Obviously you couldn’t put a Tuol Sleng in our country, and have it have the same meaning. And the U.S. Holocaust Museum serves a great purpose in educating those who are unable to visit the sites of these historic horrors. But I guess my point is, in order to understand the gravity and magnitude of the mass murder — you have to visit the places where it happened. At least for me, that was the case.

topics:
genocide

View all comments (17) |

Eric Dondero | 7.27.09 @ 6:26PM

Bandow is an isolationist decidedly left "libertarian," meaning that he would have been opposed to the Vietnam War, and subsequently, any efforts by the United States to intervene to help the Cambodian people against the bloody regime of Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge.

It sickens me that America-haters like Bandow are even allowed to spout their views at a such a wonderful freedom loving publication like American Spectator.

But Paul, as one of the greatest champions of Worldwide Liberty, you lose a bit of credibility by siding with Bandow and his ilk.

AS should seriously consider getting rid of Bandow. But at the very least, Paul, please don't give the guy any praise.

He's an America-hater from the word go.

AKA| 7.27.09 @ 9:00PM

Well, Tuol Sleng (the museum) is different than the Holocuast Museum because it was actually a murder facility. Just like the memorials in Rwanda are different from other memorials to the genocide there in 1994.

Of course it is different to experience the locations where these horrors took place. It is only natural that the actual site would be more immediate and moving than a memorial set up in remembrance erected elsewhere, just as standing on the beaches of Normandy gives one a different perspective than does standing at the WWII memorial on the National Mall.

G. A. Kevis| 7.27.09 @ 11:54PM

" ... I am fairly new to the study of the genocide issue so I am in no position to make value comparisons between the worth of one museum over another. Both have significant contributions to make to the education of society and both should burden visitors with how and why questions, and with puzzlement that such
evil could exist ...."

And when will a genocide museum be built
to expansively shelter tens of millions of
pink and blue booties - behind glass partitions -
representing the tally of the ongoing slaughter
of innocents in this country ?

GOD bless America ?

Yeah, sure.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Paul Chesser

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/07/27/genocide-museums

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

The Mole in Don Draper

James Bowman | 6.17.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

ADVERTISEMENT