Democrats are probably wishing Google and Lexis Nexus weren't so prevalent this week as they beat the "Bush lied" drum. As RET noted earlier this year, "Search machines make it easy to retrieve a public person's errors." The WSJ editorial board went search machine happy in today's editorial on the Democrats' records on Iraq intel. You're familiar with the record, but don't miss some choice highlights.
The Spectacle Blog
Red State Democrat, Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, is at a "comfort level" with Judge Alito. Toss in two other Gang of 14 members, Graham and DeWine, and the Gang's going to have difficulty staying together in a Democratic filibuster against the nominee. If the GOP's liberal three oppose the filibuster, the vote count's up to 56 -- more than enough to go nuclear.
Late last night I checked out the Lakers-Nuggets game on ESPN. During a break in the action, suddenly a political ad was played for my Cox Cable area's viewers -- in Spanish. Makes sense, no? The Lakers after all represent Los Angeles, a large Spanish-speaking market.
But wait. I live in Northern Virginia. The ad had nothing to do with California's coming propositions. It was for Virginia's Democratic gubernatorial candidate, Tim Kaine. There are enough registered Hispanic voters in this area to reach out to? That's not something you hear much about.
Instead, the impression is always that most Hispanics here are presumed to be undocumented and thus not citizens, which is probably unfair to many thousands who have become naturalized. Regardless, Democrats must consider them all their own, no questions asked. Otherwise, why not attract them in English?
Courtesy of Drudge:
"GUEST HIGHLIGHTS AT WHITE HOUSE DINNER FOR PRINCE CHARLES AND DUTCHESS: Miss Jenna Bush/ Mr. Henry Hager (Guest); Tom Brokaw; Michael Beschloss, Historian; Mary Cheney, Ms. Heather Poe (Guest); Kelsey Grammer; Nancy Reagan, Mr. Merv Griffin (Guest); Condoleezza Rice, Mr. Gene A. Washington, Director of Football Operations, National Football League (Guest); R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr., Editor in Chief, The American Spectator...Medallions of Buffalo Tenderloin, Roasted Corn, Wild Rice Pancakes, Glazed Parsnips and Young Carrots; Mint Romaine Lettuce with Blood Orange Vinaigrette, Vermont Camembert Cheese and Spiced Walnuts; Petits Fours Cake, Chartreuse Ice Cream, Red and Green Grape Sauce... "
OK, all you media watchers. See if you can guess which big daily newspaper ran this as the ultimate paragraph in their principal editorial today:
"The key issue of course is that once again the rigged evidence with which Bush tried first to persuade the UN to invade Iraq and then used anyway with Britain's Tony Blair to justify their independent attack on Saddam, is back center stage. Americans did not seem to care back in 2003. They still didn't care last November when they re-elected Bush -- this time with a legitimate majority. But they care now. In the selfsame week of the White House humiliation over Harriet Miers and the indictment of Lewis Libby and the continued implication of Karl Rove, the number of the U.S. servicemen killed in Iraq crossed the 2,000 mark. People are wanting to know how much longer American dollars and American blood are going to be poured out. They might not have worried had Saddam's overthrow been quick and created a stable Iraq or the death had been on the Iraq side alone. Instead now they see the rising price of failure based on lies and their view is changing to anger. Could the Bush second term perhaps end like Richard Nixon's?"
What a surprise. The worst
Their Supreme Court analysis has never been great, but Slate's offerings on Samuel Alito are especially hysterical (definition 1, and sometimes 3). One example: Richard Schragger writes, regarding Alito's abortion jurisprudence: "Seeking to cloud this issue by pointing out that Alito authored opinions on both sides of the issue is nonsense. Nothing could be further from the truth." To make his case, Scragger discusses Casey and Farmer, emphasizing the distance in the latter case between the majority opinion Alito's precedent-based concurrence. But he totally ignores Elizabeth Blackwell Health Center for Women v. Knoll, the Medicaid abortion-funding case which I described here. Knoll was a split 2-1 decision, so it's not as if Alito's deference to Clinton admininstration policy was inevitable.
The Vanity Fair excerptÂ from Mary Mapes' book is further proof of the Boccardi/Thornburgh whitewash of CBS's forgery-based National Guard story. While Mapes whines about having to answer questions from Boccardi about her baldly liberal bias -- "Wouldn't you describe yourself as a liberal?" he asked her at one pointÂ -- she neglects to mention thatÂ his report outrageously ruled bias out as a "factor" in theÂ fiasco.Â Dick Thornburgh, whom Mapes calls an "empty suit" andÂ delights in reminding readersÂ was one of the firstÂ victims of an Ali G.Â prank,Â went along with the whitewash.Â MapesÂ should thank those guys forÂ letting her off the hook on that. Boccardi knew thatÂ she was an axe-grindingÂ liberal butÂ omittedÂ thatÂ from his account andÂ declared that "haste" was theÂ cause of the bungling -- a veryÂ novel explanationÂ when both Rather and Mapes are standing by the forgery over a year later.