Cornyn is asking the right questions, this time about “inherent
physiological differences.” He is homing in on the right topic.
He is trying to hold her feet to the fire. Then… ARRGGGHHH….
he fails to hit the obvious last follow-up, which is to
absolutely insist on her discussing the “physiological”
differences in judging. He said HE was struggling to understand
her (bizarre and implausible) distinctions, but did not ask the
ultimate follow-up that put HER on the spot. He let her wriggle
of the hook. He’s doing a pretty good job, but not a great one —
on several of the areas where she is most vulnerable. Likewise,
he asked about her embrace of the “indefinite” nature of the
law… but didn’t, quite, adequately follow up.
Pingback| 7.15.09 @ 10:38AM
A False Gotcha links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Oldefarte| 7.15.09 @ 10:56AM
If he or ANY JC Republican votes for her confirmation, HE/THEY should ALL be defeated at re-election!!!!!!!!!!
links of london | 8.2.09 @ 1:55AM
The key marketing item of the GY-HM100 is that its stable-territory record writes annals exactly into Quicktime wrapped library using the *.Mov design. The ?IDEA? Is that by being already wrapped up as Quicktime the store can amend the archives Natively lacking having to re-wrap them, like good little lemmings.
lour | 1.17.10 @ 3:40AM
all star shoes
nike shoes outlet