The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Bless Sen. Grassley. He tries.

At the END of his second round of questioning Judge Sotomayor just now, he did what he should have done within his FIRST round of questioning yesterday, and then certainly should have done at the beginning of his second round. He put her on the spot about how landowner Didden should have been expected to file suit against the eminent domain "taking" of his land a full year and half before his land actually was taken. The way Grassley's question was worded was perfect. It covered all the bases -- for a FIRST question upon returning to the subject. The problem, though, was that it was at the end of his question period -- so it allowed Sotomayor to give an answer that actually sounded rather convincing, to the untrained ear, even though her answer was utterly full of balderdash.

And then Grassley's time was up, so he didn't even get the chance to note all the ways her answer was utter balderdash. It came off sounding as if he asked a tough question and she answered it fully and well. She got the last word, sounding good doing it, even though her word was intellectually indefensible if you know the case -- and indefensible even to the untrained ear fairly easily IF Grassley had given himself time for follow-up in this, his final round of questioning. As this is a crucially important case, his failure to give himself a proper chance to drive home his point was a real oversight, a real failure. And this is even though he merits credit for bringing up the topic not once but twice, and for how he and his staff worded the question the second time around.

Again, what this shows is a failing of the GOP senators to understand how these hearings can and should be used for public elucidation and for shaping public opinion. It's as if they are throwing lots of good spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks, rather than having already figured out for themselves which recipes are likely to be delicious.

What a shame. A little more effort, a little more planning, would have REALLY made a difference.

View all comments (3) | Leave a comment

Patriot| 7.15.09 @ 6:30PM

Quin, did you REALLY think we could stop Sotomayor? At least the Republican Senators stepped up; it's more than I expected.

I think 24/7 criticism is a mistake; sometimes credit is due, too.

Grzmlyk| 7.16.09 @ 11:42AM

24/7 criticism? Have you seen how Republicans have lain down for previous Democrat-chosen Supreme Court nominees versus what Bork and Thomas and Roberts and Alito were put through?????

Gimme a break. It should have been a full-court press. At their BEST Republicans are feckless enablers.

And I don't know what credit is due to Sotomayor - what, that she slid through the greased skids of affirmative action to attain her lofty position with grace?

She didn't even do that! She's unqualified, a hack, an admitted racist and a mediocrity.

The bum should be summarily depositied curbside without so much as cab fare.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Quin Hillyer

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/07/15/grassley-almost-trips-up-sotom
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT