At the END of his second round of questioning Judge Sotomayor
just now, he did what he should have done within his FIRST round
of questioning yesterday, and then certainly should have done at
the beginning of his second round. He put her on the spot about
how landowner Didden should have been expected to file suit
against the eminent domain "taking" of his land a full year and
half before his land actually was taken. The way Grassley's
question was worded was perfect. It covered all the bases -- for
a FIRST question upon returning to the subject. The problem,
though, was that it was at the end of his question period -- so
it allowed Sotomayor to give an answer that actually sounded
rather convincing, to the untrained ear, even though her answer
was utterly full of balderdash.
And then Grassley's time was up, so he didn't even get the chance
to note all the ways her answer was utter balderdash. It came off
sounding as if he asked a tough question and she answered it
fully and well. She got the last word, sounding good doing it,
even though her word was intellectually indefensible if you know
the case -- and indefensible even to the untrained ear fairly
easily IF Grassley had given himself time for follow-up in this,
his final round of questioning. As this is a crucially important
case, his failure to give himself a proper chance to drive home
his point was a real oversight, a real failure. And this is even
though he merits credit for bringing up the topic not once but
twice, and for how he and his staff worded the question the
second time around.
Again, what this shows is a failing of the GOP senators to
understand how these hearings can and should be used for public
elucidation and for shaping public opinion. It's as if they are
throwing lots of good spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks,
rather than having already figured out for themselves which
recipes are likely to be delicious.
What a shame. A little more effort, a little more planning, would
have REALLY made a difference.
Quin, did you REALLY think we could stop Sotomayor? At least the
Republican Senators stepped up; it's more than I expected.
I think 24/7 criticism is a mistake; sometimes credit is due,
too.
Grzmlyk| 7.16.09 @ 11:42AM
24/7 criticism? Have you seen how Republicans have lain down for
previous Democrat-chosen Supreme Court nominees versus what Bork
and Thomas and Roberts and Alito were put through?????
Gimme a break. It should have been a full-court press. At their
BEST Republicans are feckless enablers.
And I don't know what credit is due to Sotomayor - what, that she
slid through the greased skids of affirmative action to attain
her lofty position with grace?
She didn't even do that! She's unqualified, a hack, an admitted
racist and a mediocrity.
The bum should be summarily depositied curbside without so much
as cab fare.
Patriot| 7.15.09 @ 6:30PM
Quin, did you REALLY think we could stop Sotomayor? At least the Republican Senators stepped up; it's more than I expected.
I think 24/7 criticism is a mistake; sometimes credit is due, too.
Grzmlyk| 7.16.09 @ 11:42AM
24/7 criticism? Have you seen how Republicans have lain down for previous Democrat-chosen Supreme Court nominees versus what Bork and Thomas and Roberts and Alito were put through?????
Gimme a break. It should have been a full-court press. At their BEST Republicans are feckless enablers.
And I don't know what credit is due to Sotomayor - what, that she slid through the greased skids of affirmative action to attain her lofty position with grace?
She didn't even do that! She's unqualified, a hack, an admitted racist and a mediocrity.
The bum should be summarily depositied curbside without so much as cab fare.