The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

Did Sotomayor Tip Her Hand on the Sixth Amendment?

Contrary to my expectations, Sotomayor actually was asked today about the Confrontation Clause case I wrote about a couple weeks ago. Amy Klobuchar, the Minnesota senator who we can be certain never did coke with Chris Farley, expressed her concern as a former prosecutor with Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts and asked for Sotmayor's thoughts. Here's how she answered:

It's always difficult to deal with people's disappointments about cases, particularly when they have personal experiences and have their own sense of the impact of a case.

I was a former prosecutor. And it's difficult proving cases as it is. Calling more witnesses adds some burdens to the process.

But, at the end, that case is a decided case. And so its holding now is its holding, and that's what guides the court in the future on similar issues to the extent there can be some.

As I said, I do recognize that there can be problems, as a former prosecutor, but that also can't compel a result. And all of those issues have to be looked at in the context of the court's evaluation of the case and the judge's view of what the law permits and doesn't permit.

Souter was in the majority in Melendez-Diaz, which was decided 5-4. It's hard to be sure based on her vague phrasing, but if Sotomayor means to suggest that she wouldn't vote to overturn Melendez-Diaz, that's a big deal -- the Court will revisit the issue of the Sixth Amendment right to confront forensic analysts next term.

Comments

Pingback| 7.16.09 @ 2:25PM

The Agitator » Blog Archive » Sotomayor’s First Big Case May Be on the Right to Confr links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…And all of those issues have to be looked at in the context of the court’s evaluation of the case and the judge’s view of what the law permits and doesn’t permit. The American Spectator ’s John Tabin suggests Sotomayor’s answer hints that she would not use the Virginia case to overturn Melendez-Diaz. I agree, although I don’t think an outright reversal was in the cards in…

Pingback| 7.17.09 @ 8:55AM

Sotomayor on Melendez-Diaz links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…biography means things will be a little more nuanced. But, happily, someone asked her about Melendez-Diaz in her confirmation hearings! The Senior Senator from Minnesota asked Judge Sotomayor about Melendez-Diaz at her confirmation hearing.  Mentioning that she, herself, would have been annoyed to do more work as a prosecutor, Senator Klobuchar asked Judge Sotomayer what she thought of the case.  The…

uggboots| 9.2.09 @ 3:51AM

ugg boots sale
Classic Short Ugg Boots

uggboots| 9.2.09 @ 3:52AM

ugg bailey button boots
Classic Tall Ugg Boots

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

The Threat to Medical Innovation

Philip Klein

* * * *

Get That Hacker a Pimp Coat

Paul Chesser

* * * *

Justice Dep't Recusal List!

Quin Hillyer

* * * *

The Ben Nelson Shuffle

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

Moment of Truth

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

No Sales Days in the Afghan War

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Bureaucrats With Badges

Mark Hyman

* * * *

Obama in Wonderland

Ken Blackwell

* * * *

A Writer Speaks

William Tucker

* * * *

What Has Changed?

Robert P. Kirchhoefer

* * * *

High Stakes

Manon McKinnon

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT