The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Investigations of the inspector general firings are "moving forward in a bipartisan fashion," I was told Tuesday afternoon in separate face-to-face meetings with both Democrat and Republican staffers on Capitol Hill. The Democrat said it with apparent sincerity, while the Republican's repeated the same words with transparent irony.

Exactly how "bipartisan" are these investigations? Republicans remain skeptical of Democratic sincerity. Some telephone interviews with key witnesses have been scheduled as bipartisan conference calls. Sometimes Democratic investigators are on the call; other times, they're no-shows.

This on-and-off, hot-and-cold interest in the IG story by Democratic staffers may or may not be politically significant. Republicans continue slogging forward either way, though mystified or frustrated by the intermittent nature of bipartisanship.

Much more is going on behind the scenes than has been reported and, indeed, I was told Tuesday afternoon by one investigator that keeping up with all the meetings and phone calls prevents staffers from seeing all the reporting. However, the investigator praised the thorough work of the Examiner's Byron York and was heartened by a Tuesday morning report from USA Today's Matt Kelley. 

Two intriguing tidbits emerged from my Tuesday trip to the Hill:

  • Attention to the IG story has prompted at least one more inspector general to contact Congress. Meaning . . .? "When they come knocking on our door," said the source, "it's not because everything's hunky-dory."
  • The name of Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) was mentioned in an indirect way. Many questions have been asked publicly about Dodd, the TARP bailout and troubled insurance giant AIG. There are now whispers of hints of shadows of suspicions that certain "Friends of Chris" may be trying to muzzle at least one watchdog that threatens to bite Dodd.

As I say, however, that was just an indirect mention and there was no suggestion of actual malfeasance by the senior senator from Connecticut. Certainly, none of my Hill sources mentioned the senior senators's good friend Ned Lamont. However, when I discussed all this with a fellow journalist, he observed that the junior senator from Connecticut "doesn't owe those people squat."

If bipartisanship doesn't work, perhaps tripartisanship will.

View all comments (9) | Leave a comment

Robert Belvedere| 7.15.09 @ 8:01AM

Great work Stacy.

Quoted from and linked to at:
http://www.thecampofthesaints.com/2009.07.12_arch.html#1247658519753

Robert Belvedere| 7.15.09 @ 8:07AM

Forgot to mention...linked to at:
http://www.thecampofthesaints.com/wwuam.html#unwelcome_distractions

Pingback| 7.15.09 @ 11:25AM

IG-Gate: Plot STILL Thickening « The Rhetorican links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

nbsp;No. Other works Disclaimer/Terms of Use jump to navigation IG-Gate: Plot STILL Thickening July 15, 2009 Posted by Jehuda in Uncategorized. Tags: News, Politics trackback R.S. McCain: A Dodd connection? It’s the little scandal that could! search "Not a rhetorician. Just a Rhetorican." Get The Rhetorican to Go! Click Here for Mobile Feed (via Mowser) Meanwhile, On Twitter… Wow, this movie…

Pingback| 7.20.09 @ 8:06AM

Behind Closed Doors | America Watches Obama links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…years ago, one veteran Washington journalist told me last week, Lieberman “don’t owe those people squat.” ********* PREVIOUSLY: July 17: Amtrak IG: Important Background July 14: IG-Gate: Sincere Doubts July 14: The Little Scandal That Could July 9: Democrats Question AmeriCorps Official’s Stonewall on IG Case July 1: Malkin on IG-Gate: Does the Endangered Species Act Include Watchdogs? June…

Pingback| 9.15.09 @ 11:35AM

The Greenroom » Forum Archive » IG-Gate Update: Questions on Capitol Hill links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…Democratic Staffers ‘Useless’ in Investigations, SayRepublicans July 20: IG-Gate: Connecting the SIGTARP Dots July 20: Behind Closed Doors July 17: Amtrak IG: Important Background July 14: IG-Gate: Sincere Doubts July 14: The Little Scandal That Could July 9: Democrats Question AmeriCorps Official’s Stonewall on IG Case July 1: Malkin on IG-Gate: Does the Endangered Species Act Include Watchdogs? June…

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Robert Stacy McCain

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/07/14/ig-gate-sincere-doubts
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Audacity of Obama's Secularism

George Neumayr | 2.7.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

Thank Him, Santorum!

Jay D. Homnick | 2.8.12

Let Mrs. Obama Eat Red Velvet Cake

Aaron Goldstein | 2.7.12

ADVERTISEMENT