Ain't happy with cap 'n trade.
Explains Hansen:
For all its "green" aura, Waxman-Markey locks in fossil fuel
business-as-usual and garlands it with a Ponzi-like
"cap-and-trade" scheme. Here are a few of the bill's egregious
flaws:
- It guts the Clean Air Act, removing EPA's ability to
regulate CO2 emissions from power plants.
- It sets meager targets -- 2020 emissions are to be a paltry
13% less than this year's level -- and sabotages even
these by permitting fictitious "offsets," by which other
nations are paid to preserve forests - while logging and food
production will simply move elsewhere to meet market demand.
- Its cap-and-trade system, reports former U.S.
Undersecretary of Commerce for Economic Affairs
Robert Shapiro, "has no provisions to prevent insider
trading by utilities and energy companies or a financial
meltdown from speculators trading frantically in the permits
and their derivatives."
- It fails to set predictable prices for carbon, without
which, Shapiro notes, "businesses and households won't be able
to calculate whether developing and using less carbon-intensive
energy and technologies makes economic sense," thus ensuring
that millions of carbon-critical decisions fall short.
Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln,how was the play?
Of course, Hansen is happy to have legislation that would destroy
the economy. But at least he actually would like the result
to be lower emissions. The Democrats seem to be committed
to impoverishing America for the fun of it. As long as
taxes go up and there's more money to hand out to the usual
interest groups, why worry?
(H/t
to Marc Morano.)
About the Author
Doug Bandow is a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute and the Senior Fellow in International Religious Persecution at the Institute on Religion and Public Policy. A former Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan, he is author of Beyond Good Intentions: A Biblical View of Politics (Crossway).