The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

Dems Defend the Fed, America's Big Government Enabler

Why are Democratic lawmakers so eager to shield the Federal Reserve Board from public scrutiny?

After Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Nebraska) used a procedural trick in the U.S. Senate to torpedo a longshot legislative bid that would have had the Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit the Fed, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina) expressed his disappointment on the "Glenn Beck Program":

Frankly, a lot of us here in this country and around the world, are concerned that we're going to destroy the American dollar and the worldwide reserve currency.

DeMint told substitute host Judge Andrew Napolitano that

If we could get the Federal Reserve under control, it would make it more difficult for the Obama administration, I think, to carry out the continued spending and growing of debt.

Fed deputy chairman Donald Kohn is opposed to the idea. He told a congressional hearing that auditing the primary institutional enabler of Big Government in America would interfere with Fed processes.

If the GAO, a congressional agency, were authorized to audit the Fed, that "could cast a chill on monetary policy deliberations," Kohn said.

Or Americans could find out where their tax dollars are going from an unaccountable, opaque entity that refuses to identify the recipients of $2 trillion-plus in emergency loans from U.S. taxpayers and the collateral backing the loans.

Making the Fed more transparent could also put to rest some of the kookier conspiracy theories about it.

Comments

Bob| 7.10.09 @ 4:52PM

Vadum -- I usually disagree with you on financial issues, but you are on target with this one. The Fed, Fannie, and Freddie need oversight. The problem we have with government oversight, however, is that things like derivatives and some of the more complex financial instruments are too sophisticated for government employees to understand. These instruments (and I helped design some of them) are made to look good. You must to some sophisticated mathematical modeling with data unavailable to you to uncover fraud or over-leveraging.

So, along with increased oversight, the government needs to hire some sophisticated financial analysts with a knowledge of non-bank financial institutions. These people will require significant salaries which I think are worth paying. If you don't hire these people and give them the support they need (which is an expensive proposition), then oversight is a waste of time.

Matthew Vadum| 7.10.09 @ 5:00PM

Thanks, Bob.

I don't know what the solution is but I know the status quo with the Fed isn't working.

Bob| 7.10.09 @ 5:12PM

Matthew, I think the issue is competence. Paulson was a disaster at treasury as his background was nothing more than a highly paid day trader. Geithner is smart, but he is more of an economist than a Wall Street Financial guy -- the Treasury job seems over his head even though he seems to be honestly trying. Summers is the brightest bulb in the room but is not a team player and doesn't listen to anyone. The financial people I like best are Romer and Bair -- they are not only very smart, but they are savvy and team players.

The solution must lie in increasing government competence -- (I know, I know.... that is a contradiction in terms.)

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

The Threat to Medical Innovation

Philip Klein

* * * *

Get That Hacker a Pimp Coat

Paul Chesser

* * * *

Justice Dep't Recusal List!

Quin Hillyer

* * * *

The Ben Nelson Shuffle

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

Moment of Truth

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

No Sales Days in the Afghan War

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Bureaucrats With Badges

Mark Hyman

* * * *

Obama in Wonderland

Ken Blackwell

* * * *

A Writer Speaks

William Tucker

* * * *

What Has Changed?

Robert P. Kirchhoefer

* * * *

High Stakes

Manon McKinnon

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT